Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› JetBlue have landing problems on TV.
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
JetBlue have landing problems on TV. (Read 1056 times)
Reply #15 -
Sep 21
st
, 2005 at 11:59pm
Drumlineramos
Ex Member
interesting stuff. kudos to the pilots, they made a nice landing.
Ramos
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 1:41am
Saitek
Offline
Colonel
UK
Gender:
Posts: 7555
I just watched the video onhe BBC.
Stunning.
I'm so glad everyone made it out ok. 8)
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W
Flying FSX with Saitek's pro flight range:
Radio
Switch panel
Auto-pilot
Yoke and throttle quad
Pedals
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 7:37am
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Quote:
-There wasn't any fire on the nose gear, so there problably isn't any reason to apply any suppressant anywhere. (They essentialy made a normal landing)
All the more reason to apply suppressant - thats going to be several very hot pieces of metal in that landing gear, which will be operated using very flammable hydraulic fluid...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 8:59am
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
They aired a radio interview with a guy that was on the plane... where he was watching CNN to see the plane he flew on on the news
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 9:34am
TacitBlue
Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Gender:
Posts: 5391
I saw an interview on Good Morning America today with some of the passengers. They said they were watching the event live on TV as it happened, I'll bet that was a weird feeling. I'm glad everyone was OK, and even more happy that they didn't do the standard stupid passenger thing and blame the pilot. All those that were interviewed thanked the pilot and crew.
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y
Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 9:46am
Saitek
Offline
Colonel
UK
Gender:
Posts: 7555
Indeed!
How amazing, technology has really advanced and it suddenly dawns on you when you read that. 8)
Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Intel Core 2 Duo E2180 2GHz
GA-P35-DS3L Intel P35
Kingston HyperX 4GB (2x2) DDR2 6400C4 800Mhz
GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
2 x 22" monitors
200GB Sata
Be Quiet! Straight Power 650W
Flying FSX with Saitek's pro flight range:
Radio
Switch panel
Auto-pilot
Yoke and throttle quad
Pedals
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 10:24am
Deputy
Offline
Colonel
Hillsboro, Oregon
Gender:
Posts: 2090
The problem with fire suppressant is that it makes the runway slick - leaving less control. As for not for putting a hose on the gear, there was no reason to - no fire, no water. Emergency escape slides are notoriously dangerous - people have slid right off the side, remember how high these jets sit - hitting your ass on concrete after a 15 foot fall..... Believe me, it ain't fun. A fall like that can snap your spinal column.
And, in my opinion - that pilot deserves a raise.
Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when I come for you?&&&&
Iustita Omnibus
&&
Justice for All
&&&&Women are: attractive, single, mentally stable. Pick two.&&
&&Yes, we drive on the right-hand-side of the road. Yes, I parked on the left-hand-side of the road. Yes, I blocked traffic for a picture. &&&&&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 12:12pm
Flying Trucker
Ex Member
Yes the crew deserve a well done, not just the Captain.
That particular model of the Airbus does not require the capability to dump fuel as it can land with an all up fuel load.
The aircraft remained in the air for several reasons, not to just burn off some fuel as the reporters said BUT to give the pilots time to work out a solution.
It also gave the engineers time to speak with the pilots and to help with a solution.
Landing gear amongst other failures are practiced and drilled over and over and over in simulators.
I do not believe the passengers watched their landing on monitors as standard procedure would be to turn off all non essential electrical equipment and they would be required to give their full attention to the back end crew.
The pilots would have used controlled braking and engine power to control the aircraft and held the nose off as long as possible.
All in all a well executed controlled crash landing
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 12:33pm
looie
Offline
Colonel
keighley
Gender:
Posts: 75
i just saw that now gd landing. its strange how there were bno plane accidents but recently there's loads.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 12:35pm
looie
Offline
Colonel
keighley
Gender:
Posts: 75
Quote:
All the more reason to apply suppressant - thats going to be several very hot pieces of metal in that landing gear, which will be operated using very flammable hydraulic fluid...
they obviously didnt need to apply suppresent or they would have done.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 2:17pm
jrpilot
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 2255
Quote:
And, in my opinion - that pilot deserves a raise.
May I correct you...ALL pilots deserve a raise.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 2:45pm
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
Quote:
i just saw that now gd landing. its strange how there were bno plane accidents but recently there's loads.
Mmm.. we've been over this. There has been NO increase in aviation incidents, just an increase in their media coverage
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 2:57pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
When the plane drifted off to the right, when the front gear hit paint, that's when the flames erupted. I figured that the flames were just caused because the tires had worn completely down and the plane was on aluminum.
I haven't watched the vid so don't know if the tyres were burned through or ripped off as I would imagine. I don't know how bad the fire was either. Most aircraft wheels are manufactured from magnesium alloy. Anyone seeing a magnesium fire will know that it's very difficult, if not impossible to extinguish as, once ignited, magnesium will burn even underwater.
Quote:
Extinguishing Magnesium Fires
Magnesium and its alloys present special problems in fire protection. Magnesium combines so readily with oxygen that under some conditions water applied to extinguish magnesium fires may be decomposed into its constituent elements, oxygen and hydrogen. The oxygen combines with the magnesium and the released hydrogen adds to the intensity of the fire. None of the commonly available gaseous extinguishing agents (CO{sub 2}, for example) are suitable for extinguishing magnesium fires. The affinity of magnesium for oxygen is so great that it will burn in an atmosphere of carbon dioxide. Magnesium may also burn in an atmosphere of nitrogen to form magnesium nitride. For these reasons, the common extinguishing methods which depend on water, water solutions, or inert gas are not effective on magnesium chip fires. Halogen containing extinguishing agents (the Halons) react violently with burning magnesium because the chlorine or other halogen combines with the magnesium. However, flooding with noble gases (e.g., helium or argon) will extinguish burning magnesium.
http://www.eh.doe.gov/techstds/standard/hdbk1081/hbk1081c.html
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 3:12pm
TacitBlue
Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Gender:
Posts: 5391
I've always wondered why anything is made out of magnesium, given its volitile nature. Is it stronger than aluminum?
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y
Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Sep 22
nd
, 2005 at 3:25pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Magnesium is much lighter for its strength than any comparable material. That's the reason it's commonly used for aircraft components. I don't know if it's the same now but most passenger seats frames were constructed of magnesium alloy. That gives you something to think about. Mind you, it's not easy to ignite but once alight it's very difficult to extinguish.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.