Simviation Forum

Sep 10^th, 2005 at 8:28am

Theis Offline
Colonel
Always somewhere, sometime..
Rødovre, Denmark

Gender:
Posts: 6116

The new airbus A400M is Airbus latest answer to the Hercules

http://www.airbusmilitary.com/home.html
Cool!
http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/A400M1tht
Can you see missiles?
http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/A400M2tht
Smokey!
http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/A400M3tht
woow!
http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/A400M4tht
This Cockpit is AWESOME!!
http://www.simviation.com/yabbuploads/A400M5tht

Cheers Theis

Bar by Mees

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #1 - Sep 10^th, 2005 at 11:49am

Ivan Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender:
Posts: 6058

copy paste pot ketlle.

An-70 -> An-7x german project -> Airbus A400.

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones), Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #2 - Sep 10^th, 2005 at 11:52am

jrpilot Offline
Colonel

Gender:
Posts: 2255

Doesn't look like an Airbus cockpit...

I personally don't see this becoming a big seller since most people who want the Hercules already have it...and the cost to design and manifacture the A400M will be high.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #3 - Sep 10^th, 2005 at 12:22pm

Sytse Offline
Colonel
Virtual Red Arrows
The Netherlands

Gender:
Posts: 3590

Nice pics though... I'd love to fly that beast once...

&&Virtual Red Arrows homepage

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #4 - Sep 10^th, 2005 at 12:24pm

C Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144

Quote:

Doesn't look like an Airbus cockpit...

I personally don't see this becoming a big seller since most people who want the Hercules already have it...and the cost to design and manifacture the A400M will be high.

They've already got several major orders. It'll be a viable alternative to the limited capability of the Herc (due to its internal dimensions) and the very expensive C-17 (how many airforces have been able to afford that?). Completely new airframe, modern avionics, new engines: shouldn't be too bad...

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #5 - Sep 10^th, 2005 at 12:41pm

Craig. Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender:
Posts: 18590

Quote:

They've already got several major orders. It'll be a viable alternative to the limited capability of the Herc (due to its internal dimensions) and the very expensive C-17 (how many airforces have been able to afford that?). Completely new airframe, modern avionics, new engines: shouldn't be too bad...

What Charlie said. This isnt a new idea, they have been designing it for quiet a few years now, and will be very sucessful. As Charlie said, its a very good inbetween of the C17 and Herc. Looks like an Airbus cockpit to me, the screens are a little bigger for military requirements, but the same standard layout and side-stick.
As for it being a copy of some antanov or whatever, maybe, but its also a basic copy of the C130 which is god knows how old. No point going down that road, as the designs for such transports will be pretty much the same, as its the best method. High wing 4 prop. change the tail a little there ya go.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #6 - Sep 10^th, 2005 at 12:55pm

Flying Trucker Ex Member

Nice looking piece of kit Theis Wink

Sorry I can't purchase one...it will land on my strip but won't fit in my hangar. Roll Eyes

Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #7 - Sep 10^th, 2005 at 3:43pm

Ivan Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender:
Posts: 6058

Swept wing, 4x 10000HP turboprops, as fast as a C17 and probably better short runway performance (no spinup time)

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones), Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #8 - Sep 19^th, 2005 at 2:56am

Boss_BlueAngels Offline
Colonel
I fly airplanes upside
down for fun.
Snohomish

Gender:
Posts: 696

just FYI... in that 2nd pic it's firing off flares.

As for takeoff performance being better than a C-17... probably, but for a jet that huge, the '17 deserves some serious respect. Those blown' flaps really increase the performance a lot.

If I'm not mistaken (correct me if I am wrong) the '17 can also operate out of a 3,000 foot strip.

The day is always better when you're flying upside down.&&&&www.fight2flyphoto.com&&&&Canon RebelXT&&Canon 18-55mm&&Sigma 10-20mm F/4-6.3&&Sigma 100-300mm F/4-6.3&&Sigma 50-500mm F/4-6.3

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #9 - Sep 19^th, 2005 at 12:24pm

C Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144

Quote:

just FYI... in that 2nd pic it's firing off flares.

It's a very well doctored C-130 pic. I'm trying to place it - I'm sure it was and RAF Herc in the original

Quote:

If I'm not mistaken (correct me if I am wrong) the '17 can also operate out of a 3,000 foot strip.

Aye, but I expect that depends a lot on what it is/isn't carrying in the back...

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #10 - Sep 20^th, 2005 at 7:07pm

Crumbso Offline
Colonel
The Sea Vixen - You aint'
never seen such a fox!!!
West Sussex, England

Gender:
Posts: 1794

Quote:

It's a very well doctored C-130 pic. I'm trying to place it - I'm sure it was and RAF Herc in the original

Indeed, I seem to remember a pic like it. The 400M also seems to have adopted a slightly different fuseflage and engine shape than in the other pics, which indicates that it is indeed a doctored pic.

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #11 - Sep 20^th, 2005 at 7:17pm

Felix/FFDS Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender:
Posts: 1000000627

Crumbso, for shame! How DARE you presume that Airbus would stoop so low as to copy a concept?

Felix/FFDS

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #12 - Sep 20^th, 2005 at 7:23pm

Crumbso Offline
Colonel
The Sea Vixen - You aint'
never seen such a fox!!!
West Sussex, England

Gender:
Posts: 1794

BAD CRUMBSO LOL!

How could I be so outragously cynical? Roll Eyes

Where's Stormy? I NEED PUNISHMENT Tongue

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #13 - Sep 21^st, 2005 at 5:29am

Heretic Ex Member

The An-70 would have been the cheaper and better looking solution, but I'm not sure whether the maintenance costs are lower than those of the A400 (because of the counter-rotating props).

The 'pit:

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #14 - Sep 21^st, 2005 at 7:08am

Ivan Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands

Gender:
Posts: 6058

Antonnov has even more SHP output... 13500HP or so (and that is a fuel flow limit, the engine easyly does 15000-16000HP)

Russian planes: IL-76 (all standard length ones), Tu-154 and Il-62, Tu-134 and An-24RV&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found here

Back to top

IP Logged

	Search the archive: