Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Would it be worth the upgrade? (Read 236 times)
Aug 31st, 2005 at 11:39am

kingmarktheaviator   Offline
Colonel
Ivybridge, Nr Plymouth, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 504
*****
 
I currently have an ATI Radeon X300SE 128MB graphics card, and have found a Radeon 9550 256MB card on dabs.com for around 40 quid.  Would I see a substantial difference if i got the 9550?

Mark

(p.s.bear in mind I cannot afford a full on top of the range card)
 

Air Training Corps Cadet since 2003. Sergeant since Sept 2006, Staff Cadet since July '06.
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Aug 31st, 2005 at 1:18pm

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
I would save for a better card. the 9550 isn't a very good one. It doesnt make sense to upgrade to a bad card.
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Aug 31st, 2005 at 2:32pm
NWISimmer   Ex Member

 
Stay away from the 9550.
I have it, i'd recommend staying with your current set up until you can afford something better.. save up for a 6600gt at the least, or better 6800gt/ultra...(that's my plan... eventually!)  Wink
Rob.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Aug 31st, 2005 at 2:45pm

kingmarktheaviator   Offline
Colonel
Ivybridge, Nr Plymouth, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 504
*****
 
It looks as if i couldnt get that card anyway, I really need one with a PCIe interface, so the 9550 is ruled out.  Can anybody point me to any affordable PCIe interface graphic cards that have 256MB memory?

Cheers

Mark
 

Air Training Corps Cadet since 2003. Sergeant since Sept 2006, Staff Cadet since July '06.
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Sep 1st, 2005 at 2:07am

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
You don't need 256mb of video memory, in fact, most 256mb equipped cards are actually slower with poor quality ram dumped onto the card.

If you don't believe me, then do some actual research and find the truth for yourself. If you see a cheap 256mb card, it's junk, simple as that. Fast video memory is very expensive, and that factor alone drives the price of quality cards up high.

Any card with true 256mb of fast video ram is going to be very expensive, there are no exceptions to date.

You need an NV6600GT 128mb PCIe card, (not a 6600, it must have the GT suffix), and you can get them cheap, just start looking around and you'll find a bargain. Brand doesn't matter but don't buy a PNY unless you want to offer Rollerball something for his........

Anything less and you are ripping yourself off.
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Sep 1st, 2005 at 3:03am

the_autopilot   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 1359
*****
 
Quote:
It looks as if i couldnt get that card anyway, I really need one with a PCIe interface, so the 9550 is ruled out.  Can anybody point me to any affordable PCIe interface graphic cards that have 256MB memory?

Cheers

Mark


As congo pointed out, it may not be in your price range.

But I will answer your question and point you toward a 256mb PCIe card thats very good: the 7800 GTX. Its about 500 USD (its price is still dropping). Its totaly worth the price, if you can afford it, and will play any game you have today (I don't care which one, bf2, hl2, d3, etc.) at the highest resolutions with top notch quality.
 

Link to sig:&&Click here&&(Cannot post signature here due to current forum restrications on linked images).
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Sep 1st, 2005 at 6:33am

ctjoyce   Offline
Colonel
Funny how my lappy runs
FSX better than your
Tower
USA

Gender: male
Posts: 4022
*****
 
Or even one of the X800 / X850 series. I have the X800 Pro and it runs everything flawlessly with all the highest settings. BF2 with around 50FPS 80 FPS on HL2 and 35 when I go online, and 30~60FPS in FS9 depending where I fly.However these were all recorded after I overclocked my card, however I'm not sure there is much of a difference between my overclock and the standird.
 

CTJoyce, Modding and voiding warranties since 2003&&Sheila's Specs:ASUS Striker Extreme 680i, Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 @ 3.2Ghz, Corsair XMS2 PC2-6400C4 2GB, 2x eVGA 7900GT KO,  Western Digital 80GB SATA & 250GB SATAIII&&Vesper's Specs: Intel Core 2 Duo T7400, 2GB DDR2-667, GeForce Go 7950GTX 512MB, 160GB Hitachi SATA 5400RPM&&Hardware FAQ, Read it and be informed&&My little corner of the world&&Once You Know You NEWEGG&&Building a computer Part 2
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Sep 1st, 2005 at 7:57am

kingmarktheaviator   Offline
Colonel
Ivybridge, Nr Plymouth, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 504
*****
 
Thanks all for the help, I am seriously looking towards the NV6600GT now, so all help was recieved gratefully.

Cheers guys

Mark
 

Air Training Corps Cadet since 2003. Sergeant since Sept 2006, Staff Cadet since July '06.
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Sep 1st, 2005 at 6:54pm

GunnerMan   Offline
Colonel
Not the trees!
In The Cockpit

Gender: male
Posts: 1488
*****
 
you will not regrett the 6600 8)
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Sep 2nd, 2005 at 12:15am

the_autopilot   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 1359
*****
 
Quote:
you will not regrett the 6600 8)



6600 GT...and yeah, you won't regret it.
 

Link to sig:&&Click here&&(Cannot post signature here due to current forum restrications on linked images).
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Sep 2nd, 2005 at 5:35pm

kingmarktheaviator   Offline
Colonel
Ivybridge, Nr Plymouth, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 504
*****
 
I just found out what card my dad's PC has, an ATI Radeon X850 which is sweet as, I think I will be simming on that computer more often.

Mark
 

Air Training Corps Cadet since 2003. Sergeant since Sept 2006, Staff Cadet since July '06.
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Sep 3rd, 2005 at 4:59pm

kingmarktheaviator   Offline
Colonel
Ivybridge, Nr Plymouth, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 504
*****
 
I ended up buying the Radeon X600 PRO which is much better than what i had.  I am regularly making 30 frames with the scenery set high (I am using VFR Scenery and mesh).  I would have got better, but i seriously could'nt afford any better, but hey, I am not complaining atall!

Mark
 

Air Training Corps Cadet since 2003. Sergeant since Sept 2006, Staff Cadet since July '06.
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Sep 4th, 2005 at 12:00pm

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
Will Dad swap?   Wink
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Sep 4th, 2005 at 7:23pm

the_autopilot   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 1359
*****
 
Quote:
I ended up buying the Radeon X600 PRO which is much better than what i had.  I am regularly making 30 frames with the scenery set high (I am using VFR Scenery and mesh).  I would have got better, but i seriously could'nt afford any better, but hey, I am not complaining atall!

Mark



Should have gotten a 6600 gt. It has much better performence.
 

Link to sig:&&Click here&&(Cannot post signature here due to current forum restrications on linked images).
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print