Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
A humble request - please forgive (Read 627 times)
Aug 17th, 2005 at 10:39am

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
I haven't posted a whole lot here so I consider myself a junior member, even though I sometimes am quite expressive in my opinions.  However, this is a little different.  Please forgive my assertiveness.

Many years ago, I was discussing the Pacific War with a co-worker.  A mutual friend of ours was listening to the discussion, even though she didn't have much to contribute.  My co-worker was referring to Japanese forces, ships, etc.  as Japs.  Our mutual friend happened to be Japanese.  After a while, she protested to our friend for his usage of the word "Jap".  Now, we all knew our friend didn't have a single ill intent in mind, he just didn't know any better.  But the word's usage was offensive to her.  I understood that, especially considering the usage of that word during the war was a term to Japanese as n*gger is to blacks.

Now, I'm the last person to be PC, in fact I hate political correctness.  But refraining from using the word, Jap seems to me as being just good manners.  The reason why I'm bringing this up is I've seen it's usage here as we discuss the Pacific War.  Upon reading the context of it's usage, I'm confident those using it had no ill-will, just they were describing planes, ships, etc.  Once again, I humbly submit this request to you fellow posters.  Thanks for reading.

Darryl

BTW, If you think I'm being wound up too tightly, I can understand that, and I apologize.
« Last Edit: Aug 17th, 2005 at 11:54am by dcunning30 »  

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Aug 17th, 2005 at 11:26am

james007   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1514
*****
 
Dcunning30 we do not understand how much degration and insults our fellow American Japanese received in that period of history.

They depicted them as monkeys and less than human. I was just seeing a program in the History channel last night about the Japanese Atomic Bomb program. We new very little about it because we never thought they where capabable of producing one.

I have brought this point before about how much we needed to feel superior to them at that time in history.

Dcunning you brought a good up valid point. I love historical discusstions and to exchage differrent Ideas. But I try never to offend anyone on a personal level.

I will try my best not to use such term in the future Dcunning30.

Thank you for bringing it up.

James007
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Aug 17th, 2005 at 11:57am

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
I saw that too!  Who'da thunk it that the Japanese exploded an experimental a-bomb?  But with the way things were after the war and currently today, we may never learn one way or another.  The Russians aren't talking, and certainly North Korea won't permit access to that area.
 

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Aug 17th, 2005 at 12:07pm

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
Quote:
I have brought this point before about how much we needed to feel superior to them at that time in history.



You know, they did it too.  You know, that's one of the ugly sides of warfare.  How are you able to kill on impulse, someone who under different circumstances, could end up being your best buddy?

The NAZI's had Arian superiority
We had our racial stereotypes of half/blind bucktooth brutes
The Japanese considered the emperor desendent of Anaterasu, and the Japanese people were the superior race with the concept of "All eight corners of the world under one roof" which was their own version of manifest destiny.
 

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Aug 17th, 2005 at 1:29pm

james007   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1514
*****
 
You are right Dcunning. They where probably worst than us. Lets not forget that the Japanese military killed millions of people during the war by design.

That was then and now we have grown I hope. The only difference is that I hold our self to a higher standards of value since we have incorporated Cristian Judeo values to our our sociaty as our main standard of value.

Thank you

James007
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Aug 17th, 2005 at 4:20pm

Corsair Freak   Offline
Colonel
Tiskilwa, Illinois, U.S.A.

Gender: male
Posts: 1537
*****
 
I'm guilty of saying 'Japs' I'm just so use to yelling colorful words at my monitor... I'll try my best to say Japanese.  Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Aug 17th, 2005 at 7:38pm

stiz   Offline
Colonel
Yorkshire-England

Gender: male
Posts: 661
*****
 
First of if i offend anyone please slap me!

I dont like being PC and think it just softens words for people who cant take being offened.

To me the word Jap is just a cut down version of Japanese, to me its just another word like Yankie for Americans, Jerry for German etc (know any for british go ahead and say it cos i cant think of one). I know people take offence by these sometimes so i try not to use them in front of them.   

Also everyone i have met (mainly young americans in this case, everyone else i now couldn't care less) thinks that the Japanese are savages and not human, what they seem to forget is that they belived strongly and so acted on thier belifes (i'm not explaining this very well am i??) and that they were that of the samuri (spelling??) and that dieing for thier country would be of great benifit to the country. Just because in most cases instead of throwing up thier arms they faught to the death does not mean they are savage, so they used different methods of torture etc its just 2 different worlds meeting. Rember that america had all the mod cons of the age most of Japan was still little huts on a hill somewhere.

If i am wrong with any of the above please correct me but to my knowledge its all true.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Aug 17th, 2005 at 8:24pm

Corsair Freak   Offline
Colonel
Tiskilwa, Illinois, U.S.A.

Gender: male
Posts: 1537
*****
 
Quote:
(know any for british go ahead and say it cos i cant think of one)


Brits, Redcoats.  Smiley


Good Hunting,
Brandon
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Aug 18th, 2005 at 12:07am

james007   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1514
*****
 
I"m Stiz but could not disagree with you more. Japan was not a poor little country pretending to be a world power at the beginning of the war.

Japan was a World power to be recon with. It had a well dicipline Army. One of the world best air force.
It also had the best navy in the world.

Yes the best navy period at the beginning of the war. How can you say this when every one knows the Royal navy was the best in the world in 1941.

Well let me explain it in simple form. In the mid thirties the major powers in the world sign the first of its kind arms control treaties.

The Japanese simply cheated and build the biggest Battleships of that era. They also had the best naval fighter in the world. The famouse Zero. The first capable to fight on equal terms the land fighters.

Excellent Dive Bombers and Torpedos. A more modern naval doctrine base on the aircraft carrier instead of the Battleships.

They where the first to have a more modern concept for military beach landings. 

The first to use leapfrogging landings behind enemy lines.

They practice it quite often during the Chinese Invation in the thirties.

Thats how they won the Battle of Shangai in 1937. They leapfrogg behind the Chinese lines and unhinged their defences.

Their Oriental Blitz of 1941 and early 1942 was a master peice that has been poorly study. Perhaps because it was not executed by a western power or becuase we where embarrass by it. It has not receive the same attention that the German Blitz of Europe has.

The Japanese where tough and a determine enemy. When condition where favorable and they where well fed and lead they where amoun the best troops in the world.

Your mentality have the the same mind set of the British had in 1941. They though that one British soldier was worth ten Japanese.

Well the Britain received it worst defeat in its military history in the Signapore campaign.

Yes they where strange enemy from our point view. They did things different with strage and sometimes hard to understand tatics.

But overall they probably where the toughest enemy the allies ever met in the Battlefield.

So you see our troops and fighting men from all the nations that parcicipated in this Theater of war deserve all our respect and honor for defeating such a enemy.

I recomend for all of us to read more about this and all the other Theaters of war in World war 2.

The more we learn the more we will appreciate what that genertion did for us today.

Never undereastimate anybody or nation or it could End up bitting you.

You now where.

This only a warning! LoL

This just a opinion

James007















 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Aug 18th, 2005 at 2:44am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
Also everyone i have met (mainly young americans in this case, everyone else i now couldn't care less) thinks that the Japanese are savages and not human

I see that wartime propaganda is still believed by the masses.

Quote:
Just because in most cases instead of throwing up thier arms they faught to the death does not mean they are savage,

In some cases this was a difference in culture. Surrender was seen as the ultimate disgrace in the Samurai code. Many Japanese civilians & ordinary soldiers committed suicide rather than surrender as they'd been told & believed that Americans were subhuman. Propaganda is used on both sides during a war to give ordinary people a reason to fight. I believe this is one point of Darryl's topic.

Quote:
Brits, Redcoats. Wink

That seems a little old-fashioned. British soldiers were usually called Tommies after Tommy Atkins. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/lj/warslj/army_04.shtml I don't know what the Japanese called them. This was usually an affectionate name used by allies & enemy alike. In the same way Americans were called Yanks & also Cowboys by German airmen. Japanese were commonly referred to as Japs or Nips by the Allied troops, neither of which was complimentary.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Aug 18th, 2005 at 12:41pm

Corsair Freak   Offline
Colonel
Tiskilwa, Illinois, U.S.A.

Gender: male
Posts: 1537
*****
 
That's the one I was thinkin' of... I just couldn't think of it at the time.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Aug 18th, 2005 at 3:01pm

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
james007,

I'm reading God's Samurai for the second time and Fuchida give uncanny incite.  I think he was in the best position to give accurate analysis from a Japanese perspective of what went wrong at Midway.  He even cowrote a book on the subject, forwarded by Raymond A Spruance!!!!  Excellent read.  It sits in my library.  Fuchida and Genda both were forward thinkers about airpower, long before it became obvious to everyone else.  Just before the Japanese sortied toward Midway, Fuchida came down with appendicitis, which sidelined him.  So, he ended up laying on the deck of the Akagi taking detailed notes diring the battle, all the way up until the Akagi was bombed.  He even recounts assessing the tactic and technique of the Dauntless bombers as they hurtled bombs toward his ship.  And later on, we was given the task of doing the official post-mortem of what went wrong at Midway and offer reccomendations to correct the errors.  What was interesting was Fuchida stated he wished Japan had 10 Halseys.  Very interesting read.

Fuchida's assessment of Japan's errors at Midway:

* The Alutians invasion was a waste of resources
* Doolittle raid cause Yamamoto to loose his cool and mount the Midway mission too soon, which meant Shokkaku and Zuikkaku couldn't participate
* Main force had no business sailing 300 miles behind Nagumo's attack force.
* Nagumo was the wrong man for the mission.  Yamaguchi should have been in command.
* Ignoring the fact that Tone's scout plane launched late and not take precautions if the Americans were actually in that search sector (which they were)
* BB's and CL's should have provided a ring of protecting fire around the CV's
* Midway would have been an untenable forward base in the first place.  Japan would have to provide resources from the Marianas, but the Americans could reach Midway from Hawaii with long range bombers.
« Last Edit: Aug 18th, 2005 at 11:38pm by dcunning30 »  

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Aug 18th, 2005 at 11:33pm

dcunning30   Offline
Colonel
This is me......really!!!!
The Land of Nod

Gender: male
Posts: 1612
*****
 
I kinda jumped ahead regarding the Halsey comment.  Fuchida said that later on in reference to the carrier raids that Halsey had been conducting.  Spruance was also involved in carrier raids, but Fuchida recognized Halsey's agressiveness, and also Spruance's methodical calculations.  And Fuchida considered what Japan needed was an agressive admiral.  Japan had one in Yamaguchi, but steeped in the Bushido code, Yamaguchi chose to go down with the Hiryu at Midway.

Now, Yamamoto was an agressive admiral, probably too much of a gambler for Japan's own good.  Contrast that with what Nimitz advised Fletcher and Spruance prior to Midway:  Use a doctrine of inflicting maximum damage on the enemy only when it appears risk to your own forces appears at a minimum. (my own words, but that was the point Nimitz made)

Problem was Yamamoto groomed his successor to toe the line, and that's exactly what Koga did.  And that was exactly what Japan DIDN'T need.
 

TURKEY TROTS TO WATER GG WHERE IS RPT WHERE IS TASK FORCE 34 RR THE WORLD WONDERS
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Aug 19th, 2005 at 12:31am

AvHistory   Offline
Colonel
Kinder & Gentler
NC, USA

Gender: male
Posts: 577
*****
 
Quote:
First of if i offend anyone please slap me!


I am way to old to be PC but consider yourself slapped - its racial slur pure & simple.

Quote:
Rember that america had all the mod cons of the age most of Japan was still little huts on a hill somewhere.  


A few things to think about early in WWII.

London 8 million
New York 7.5 million
Tokyo 7 million

Royal Navy

Aircraft Carriers 7
Battleships 15
Heavy Cruisers 15
Submarines 59

Imperial Japanese Navy

In 1909 it launched the  (Large and heavily armoured warship) battleship Satsuma, at the time the largest ship in the world by displacement.

In terms of armament, it was the first navy to mount 14-, 16- and 18.1-inch guns.

In 1922 it launched the  Hosho, the first purpose-designed aircraft carrier in the world.

Aircraft Carriers 10 - the largest and most modern carrier fleet in the world at that time.
Battleships 10  - Yamato the largest and most heavily-armed battleship in history
Heavy Cruisers 18
Submarines 68 - Sentoku I-400 class WWII's largest submarine.  Best WWII torpedo - The Long Lance.

I should have added that the 1-400 class was a submarine aircraft carrier which held 3 Aichi M6A1 Seiran sea-planes.

...

...

Not bad for a bunch of guys living in little huts on a hill somewhere  Wink


BEAR
« Last Edit: Aug 19th, 2005 at 12:45pm by AvHistory »  
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Aug 19th, 2005 at 1:30am

james007   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1514
*****
 
Bear thank you for your input. I appreciate it very much.
What the average amature historian and I believe even many professional historian do not realize is that  Japan was a Legitimate world power.

Yes Germany was the most powerful Axis power during the war but Japan was right behind it in power and influence. Unlike Italy, Japan was very much fear and respected in the Far East and in the World.

Even Russia feared the Japanese during the war. Their best arm and train Army was the Red Baron Army station in the far East.

The respect when so far that Stalin did not dare to moved it to the West even dow the German where at door steps of Moscow. He did not moved them until Surgi his master spy in Japan reported that Japan was not going to attack Russia but instead they where planning to attack the Americans.

They say that the Russians crush the Japanese in their incident on Outer Mongolia. The truth is that the Russian did repulse the Japanese from Mongolia in that incident but it was not the easy overwhelming victory they have been portraying to us Westeners for dacades.

They both developed a healthy respest for each other after that encounter. Japan feared the Russians and Russia had a deep respect of Japan that lasted throughout the war.

I would like for you guys to read this information that found on that inccident.

1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet-Japanese_Border_War_%281939%29

Now you will see what I mean.

You guys may not know this. But the best Pilots in the US where not sent to European Theater but to the Pacific Theater.

The only reason I"m writting this post is not to glorify Japan but instead to show what kind of enemy our men  in that Theater had to face and to give our men the proper respect they deserve for been up to the test and to valify their sacrifices and what they had to endure .

To show the readers what it took for our fighting men to fight in this theater of war.

I believe that thruogh the years in has become a common demeaner to think that the Japanese where a inferior fanatical fighter that was relative easy to beat. Especialy in the air war.

Nothing in the world is more wrong than this way of thinking.

I one day the truth will come out.

This has been only a opinion

Thank you for reading this post.

I hope to hear from you

James007
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Aug 19th, 2005 at 3:43am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Most people in the US seem to think of WWII in the Far East as the Pacific War & mainly a naval war. This is not surprising as British forces fighting against the Japanese from December 1941 right up to VJ Day consider themselves the Forgotten Army. http://www.burmastar.org.uk/notes.htm
Forgotten then & still forgotten now. Even though they were fighting in terrible conditions & usually badly supplied with inferior equipment they were a long way away from home & events in Europe took precedence. The surrender of Singapore is regarded as one of the greatest defeats in the history of the British Army. This is a perfect example of the mistake of underestimating the enemy. http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/fall_of_singapore.htm Quote:
Once the Japanese expanded throughout the region after Pearl Harbour (December 1941), many in Britain felt that Singapore would become an obvious target for the Japanese. However, the British military command in Singapore was confident that the power they could call on there would make any Japanese attack useless. One story told about the attitude of the British Army in Singapore was of a young Army officer complaining that the newly completed defences in Singapore might put off the Japanese from landing there.

British troops stationed in Singapore were also told that the Japanese troops were poor fighters; alright against soldiers in China who were poor fighters themselves, but of little use against the might of the British Army.

The Japanese attitude to surrender might explain (but not condone) the terrible treatment suffered by the vast number of PoWs.
Quote:
On February 8th, 1942, the Japanese attacked across the Johor Strait. Many Allied soldiers were simply too far away to influence the outcome of the battle. On February 8th, 23,000 Japanese soldiers attacked Singapore. They advanced with speed and ferocity. At the Alexandra Military Hospital, Japanese soldiers murdered the patients they found there. Percival kept many men away from the Japanese attack fearing that more Japanese would attack along the 70 mile coastline. He has been blamed for failing to back up those troops caught up directly with the fighting but it is now generally accepted that this would not have changed the final outcome but it may only have prolonged the fighting.

The Japanese took 100,000 men prisoner in Singapore. Many had just arrived and had not fired a bullet in anger. 9,000 of these men died building the Burma-Thailand railway. The people of Singapore fared worse. Many were of Chinese origin and were slaughtered by the Japanese. After the war, Japan admitted that 5000 had been murdered, but the Chinese population in Singapore put the figure at nearer 50,000. With the evidence of what the Japanese could do to a captured civilian population (as seen at Nanking), 5000 is likely to be an underestimate.

The fall of Singapore was a humiliation for the British government. The Japanese had been portrayed as useless soldiers only capable of fighting the militarily inferior Chinese. This assessment clearly rested uncomfortably with how the British Army had done in the peninsula.


The British Pacific Fleet also seems to be forgotten in much the same way. http://www.nzetc.org/tm/scholarly/tei-WH2Navy-c24.html
Quote:
At the end of the war there were 142 ships in the British Pacific Fleet and 94 ships in the Fleet Train. There were some 500 first-line aircraft, 100 on ancillary services, and 1000 in reserve. The peak strength in personnel was about 125,000 officers and men. These figures were rapidly increasing, and by the end of 1945, had hostilities continued, there would have been 400 ships of all types, 900 first-line aircraft, and more than 200,000 officers and men.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Aug 19th, 2005 at 12:04pm

james007   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1514
*****
 
Hadgar great peice of work. At the end of the war the Royal Navy was the most secound powerful in the world.

The problem was that the war had bankrupt Great Britain at the time and  she could not maintain it at that level of strength after the war.

The Signapore campaign was one of the most important in world war two because for the first time a primal colonial power in the world was beaten by a non-Europen power.

That in turn gave in to a wave of anti colonial fever after the war that practicaly ended the colonial period practices of the past.

I give the British lots of credit for realizing this and slowly giving up the colonize under their turm instead of insisting on returning the world of 1939.

Some thing the Dutch and the French had to learn the hard way.

Now I want like you readers to read this article I found on the inccident on Outer Mongolia in 1939 between the Russians and Japanese.

Just in case you did not find in on my previous post.

Here it is.

.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Aug 19th, 2005 at 12:06pm

james007   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1514
*****
 
Prelude
The incident began on May 11, 1939 when a Mongolian cavalry unit of some 70-90 men entered the disputed area in search of grazing for their horses, and encountered Manchukuoan cavalry who drove them out of the disputed territory. Two days later the Mongolian force returned and the Manchukoans were unable to evict them.

At this point the Japanese Guandong Army became involved -- a reconnaissance unit under Lt. Col. Yaozo Azuma was sent to engage the Mongolians on 14 May, but they retreated west of the river with few losses. Joseph Stalin ordered STAVKA, the Red Army's high command, to develop a plan for a counterstrike against the Japanese. To lead the attack, Georgy Zhukov, a young officer of promise, was chosen.

The Mongolians and Soviets continued to build up forces in the area, and Azuma's Force returned a week later. This time the Japanese forces were surrounded by superior numbers of Soviet and Mongolian infantry and tanks, and over 28-29 May the Azuma force was destroyed, suffering 8 officers and 97 men killed and one officer and 33 men wounded, for a total of 63% casualties. The Guangdong Army decided that the area was not worth the expenditure of any more Japanese blood.

Throughout June, however, there were continuing reports of Soviet and Mongolian activity on both sides of the river near Nomonhan, and small-scale attacks on isolated Manchukoan units. At the end of the month the local Guandong Army commander, Lt. Gen. Michitaro Komatsubara, was given permission to "expel the invaders". The Japanese operation started on 1 July and was initially successful in crossing the Halha river. However, by the evening of 3 July the attack stalled and the Soviet forces, led by Zhukov, threw the Japanese back over the river. The front then stabilized with only minor actions for the summer.

[edit]
The Battle
Finally, in mid-August, Zhukov decided it was time to break the stalemate. He deployed approximately 50,000 Russian and Mongolian troops of the 57th Special Corps to defend the east bank of the Halhin Gol River, then crossed the river on August 20 to attack the elite Japanese with three infantry divisions (70,000 men in all), massed artillery, a tank brigade, and the best planes of the Red Air Force.

Japanese doctrine at the time was for front-line troops to hold their positions with high rates of fire, and await relief actions from the rear. While very successful against the lightly armed Chinese forces, the Soviet tanks turned the tables on them entirely, and the front lines were cut off. Two complete divisions were surrounded while the other forces were scattered. On August 27, the Japanese attempted to break out of the encirclement, but failed. When the surrounded forces refused to surrender, Zhukov wiped them out with artillery and air attacks. The battle ended August 31 with the complete destruction of the Japanese forces.

[edit]
Aftermath
Following the battle, the Red Army attacked what remained of the Japanese forces and drove them back into Manchukuo. On September 16, the Japanese asked for a cease-fire and later signed a treaty in which they agreed to abide by the existing border.

Of the 30,000 troops on the Japanese side, 8440 were killed and 8766 wounded. The Red Army committed 57,000 infantry, 498 tanks, and 346 armoured cars to the battle, and claimed total losses (killed and wounded) of 9284 men. After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, new documents about the battle changed the numbers considerably. The actual number of losses in the battle was 23,926, of whom 6,831 killed, 1,143 reported missing and 15,952 wounded. While the Red Army did win the battle, it was not a one sided battle as previously believed.

[edit]
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print