Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
History
› The Official True Story of World War II
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
4
The Official True Story of World War II (Read 2334 times)
Reply #30 -
Jul 30
th
, 2005 at 1:53am
denishc
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 1018
Quote:
That is because Japan is a major trading partner
Or is it that Sony owns a major motion picture studio? The conspiracy theories abound!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Jul 30
th
, 2005 at 2:42am
Bombardier101
Offline
Colonel
I think the Caped Crusader
needs a break
Gender:
Posts: 767
I didn't mind U-571. But I just wish I could get Das Boot on DVD!
Need a DP for your new aircraft? PM me for one!&&&&My CFS2 Addons&&&&Schleswig WW2 Base Scenery:
http://www.simviation.com/cfs2scenery16.htm&&IJN
Bomber Force Campaign
http://www.simviation.com/cfs2missions22.htm&&WW&C
France WW1 Scenery WORKING ON&&Nachtjaeger! Campaign WORKING ON&&British Nightfighter Campaign LATER&&Atlantic Martlet Campaign LATER&&Iwo-jima scenery RESUME LATER&&&&UPLOADS COMING TO SOH SOON
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Jul 30
th
, 2005 at 3:59am
Scorpiоn
Offline
Colonel
Take it easy!
The Alamo
Gender:
Posts: 4496
This just goes to show the greatness of Simviation. I was initially reluctant to post this for fear of those disputes that result when people are convinced their opinion is right, but alas Simviation, at its core, is the same as the day I joined it.
Moving on...
I often find myself in a paradox regaurding movies. The older films have some horrendous visuals, poor audio than often leave me on the brink of dozing, but all the new films are pure, empty gild delivered in 5.1!
The best war movie I've seen actually isn't World War II. A Korean made war movie about the... erm... Korean War: Tae Guk Gi. While there are some things about it that stick out, it plays off in the end very nicely. It far surpasses Band of Brothers as my favorite on screen experience. I generally frown on love/action stories, but somehow I don't think the love story in Tae Guk Gi counts. I bought the Das Boot DVD, but I've never watched it. It's kind of hard to find a solid six hours open between work, sleep and play.
I personally am not bothered by the violence in movies. If it can be excluded, then it very well should be, but it's only a problem when it's used in place of a good, hard-hitting story, which it usually is nowadays. Movies just don't seem to combine the best of all worlds. Good script, realistic, factual, believable, good acting, impressive presentation. Looking at some of the older films, I'm sure in their day, they delivered all of those, but for those in my generation, the effects are just too dated. Of course when I write this, I remember films like a Bridge Too Far, which I just didn't care for too much, but when I remember Patton, I'm forced to eat my words a bit.
Also, I must give special thanks to Hagar, because after reading the gargantuan and ginormous Barbarossa, I've felt a special craving to know the happenings of the Sino-Japanese conflict, American Island Hopping, and the British in Indochina. I shall now engage in the rare act of giving Barnes and Noble my money. Despite my hate of school and academic things, I miss reading a good book. 'Tis been a few months.
Quote:
The Pacific War: World War II and the Japanese, 1931-1945 by Saburo Ienaga
The Devil's Advocate.
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Jul 30
th
, 2005 at 4:42am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I must give special thanks to Hagar, because ......
....... I shall now engage in the rare act of giving Barnes and Noble my money.
Glad I could help. Maybe I should work on commission.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Jul 30
th
, 2005 at 6:10am
Heretic
Ex Member
Speaking of movies again, how would you guys rate 'Deep Blue World' ?
And I'm asking for a neutral point of view, not the one from a Spit or love story lover.
P.S: I've seen BoB on DVD for 10€. Might go and get it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Jul 30
th
, 2005 at 4:24pm
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
I still have yet to see Dark Blue World........
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Jul 30
th
, 2005 at 5:06pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I still have yet to see
Dark
Blue World........
Ah, that explains why I couldn't find it. Never heard of it before but from the reviews I've seen it looks worth watching.
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0000648X2/103-9576535-0494234?v=g...
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Jul 31
st
, 2005 at 5:12pm
Smoke2much
Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,
Posts: 3879
My second favourite war movie of all time is Stalingrad, the German one in which everyone dies. Bloody awsome movie. Sarah refused to watch it and had a bath as I recall.
My favourit movie is Waterloo, the Dino de Laurentis version from 1973. It's historically pants but a great spectacle.
Will
Who switched the lights off? I can't see a thing....... Hold on, my eyes were closed. Oops, my bad...............&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
Aug 8
th
, 2005 at 8:38am
Bombardier101
Offline
Colonel
I think the Caped Crusader
needs a break
Gender:
Posts: 767
Quote:
I think you're missing the point Bomber old chap.
Yes I am. I'm just being up myself, that's all.
Quote:
Except the point that the gunners were destroying at least 2183248956 german aircraft in that movie.
Unrealistic.
I want to know why you think that Heretic. I really do. ???
Many Australians did die in Bomber Command. I once spoke to a veteran (Ron Elms if anyone wants to know) and asked him whether he knew someone who'd seen someone shot down by a German nightfighter after I asked him if
he'd
seen anyone downed, and he said that the guy who'd seen someone downed saw the guy go down close to base and that the Germans would stalk the bombers back near their bases and shoot them down when they were getting near landing time. The Japs are still one bit sneekier (Sydney Harbour
)
Need a DP for your new aircraft? PM me for one!&&&&My CFS2 Addons&&&&Schleswig WW2 Base Scenery:
http://www.simviation.com/cfs2scenery16.htm&&IJN
Bomber Force Campaign
http://www.simviation.com/cfs2missions22.htm&&WW&C
France WW1 Scenery WORKING ON&&Nachtjaeger! Campaign WORKING ON&&British Nightfighter Campaign LATER&&Atlantic Martlet Campaign LATER&&Iwo-jima scenery RESUME LATER&&&&UPLOADS COMING TO SOH SOON
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
Aug 8
th
, 2005 at 3:23pm
TacitBlue
Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Gender:
Posts: 5391
I find that the best way to learn about history is to read autobiographys of people who were there. I learned a lot from Bob Hoovers book, even though WWII only takes up a small portion of it. For example, I didn't know that the US flew Spitfires. I keep meaning to research that and find out more, but I never think of it when I'm... on line... be right back.
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y
Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #40 -
Aug 8
th
, 2005 at 4:50pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I find that the best way to learn about history is to read autobiographys of people who were there. I learned a lot from Bob Hoovers book, even though WWII only takes up a small portion of it. For example, I didn't know that the US flew Spitfires. I keep meaning to research that and find out more, but I never think of it when I'm... on line... be right back.
I couldn't agree more. Bob Hoover is one of my heroes although I never saw him perform in real life. Too late now as I believe he's retired.
From memory, many American pilots volunteered for the RAF before the US was involved in WWII. Some flew during the BoB & obviously flew RAF types like the Hurricane & Spitfire. The Americans were posted to their own units which were known as the Eagle Squadrons. When the US officially became involved they were given the choice of remaining with the RAF or transferring to US units. These were equipped with Spitfires until they had their own aircraft.
PS.
http://www.fourthfightergroup.com/eagles/es.html
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #41 -
Aug 8
th
, 2005 at 9:01pm
TacitBlue
Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Gender:
Posts: 5391
Very interesting. Thanks for the link Doug.
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y
Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #42 -
Aug 9
th
, 2005 at 4:48am
Heretic
Ex Member
Quote:
I want to know why you think that Heretic. I really do. ???
Gunners always greatly exaggerated the number of enemy planes they claimed to have destroyed. This is actually okay for them, since no one can determine who of the many gunners targeting an enemy fighter finally destroyed it. But the numbers are crap for historical documents.
You always get the most accurate numbers about victories from the other side.
For example, B-17 gunners usually claimed more than 150 vicories over german fighters per sortie, whereas the german lists only stated between 25 and 40 fighters lost.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #43 -
Aug 11
th
, 2005 at 1:28am
H
Offline
Colonel
2003: the year NH couldn't
save face...
NH, USA
Gender:
Posts: 6837
Quote:
Gunners always greatly exaggerated the number of enemy planes they claimed to have destroyed. This is actually okay for them, since no one can determine who of the many gunners targeting an enemy fighter finally destroyed it. But the numbers are crap for historical documents.
You always get the most accurate numbers about victories from the other side.
For example, B-17 gunners usually claimed more than 150 vicories over german fighters per sortie, whereas the german lists only stated between 25 and 40 fighters lost.
Don't get nervous, Heretic -- just a bit of back up:
As an example, much controversy ensued with who actually shot down M.vonRichthofen. Bullets flew at him from Brown's Sopwith and ground gunners, as well. When you have an innumerable amount of gunners shooting at the same target from different postions at the same time (as in bomber formations), each will see the target go down and think it's his kill [often it was a shared kill due to accumulative damage]. In the fury of battle, it's unlikely that serial numbers are going to be noted so the same kill gets a multiple claim.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #44 -
Aug 15
th
, 2005 at 4:50am
Scorpiоn
Offline
Colonel
Take it easy!
The Alamo
Gender:
Posts: 4496
Beating the dead horse again.
Just today, a(n online) BBC story:
Quote:
Countries around Asia are honouring their dead and calling for peace, as they mark the 60th anniversary of the end of World War II
in the Pacific.
They must add, in the Pacific. They seem to have left out "in Europe" when talking of VE Day so many times several months ago.
This coverage is a footnote when compared to VE day, which I'm sure many of you will remember, as there was all sorts of non-stop hooh-hah about it. You might also remember, it was hailed as the anniversary of the end of World War II. Period. Only sometimes it would be mentioned that it was in fact the anniversary of VE Day. I still contest that World War II began not in 1939, but in 1931.
It may seem silly to some, but it bothers me to no end. Maybe I should shut up and go back in my box.
The Devil's Advocate.
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
4
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History ««
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.