Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Discovery in Orbit!!! (Read 354 times)
Jul 26th, 2005 at 11:03am

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
Just over 10 minutes ago, Discovery and her crew of seven lifted off in good but hot weather and just achieved orbit. According to the official TV network feed, everything's nominal.
They had a camera onboard the external fuel tank this time, with a view of the underside of the Shuttle and the front attach point... very cool viewpoint for watching that ride. Good to see that tank separate   perfectly, after very clean SRB jettison... whew. Another new procedure: Pilot Eilleen Collins rolled Discovery just after the tank sep so that they can look for signs of insulation damage on the tank (results will not be available until later), and as they approach ISS this time, there will be another maneuver to present Discovery's belly for inspection by the crew of the ISS. I believe there is also a plan to use the payload arm to hang a camera over the side for a closer look before they get ready for deorbit.
  Congrats and good luck to the whole team!! Woohoo!! Grin
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 11:08am

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
Fantastic. Grin

Glad to see them finally back in the air.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 11:15am

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
Quote:
Fantastic. Grin

Glad to see them finally back in the air.


Really good to see the in space, too... Grin
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 11:17am

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
Quote:
Really good to see the in space, too... Grin

Just an added plus Wink Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 12:32pm

gn85   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 139
*****
 
<<APPLAUSE>> 

We have lift-off!!  Looked awesome.  That was a spectacular view from the camera on the ET.  Fantastic!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 12:37pm

jrpilot   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 2255
*****
 
Amazing how fast they were going.  Shocked
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 1:35pm

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
Excellent stuff. Now they just have to give the old bird the eyeball and make sure she is safe to come back down again!
Looks like NASA got it right 8)
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 2:23pm

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
Well, they say bad things come in threes... after the tragedies of Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia,  maybe NASA's due for a long run of safe manned flights...
At any rate, despite the occasional loss of manned or unmanned spacecraft, NASA usually does get it right. Grin
« Last Edit: Jul 27th, 2005 at 12:11am by beaky »  

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 4:28pm

gn85   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 139
*****
 
They were saying it loses half of it's weight in the first few minutes of launch from the amount of fuel being burned up.  WOW! 

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 5:14pm

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
Quote:
Well, they say bad things come in threes... after the tragedies of Apollo 11, Challenger, and Columbia,  maybe NASA's due for a long run of safe manned flights...

Apollo 1 was pretty awful too. Undecided
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 7:52pm

hatter   Offline
Colonel
hatter
Chicago, IL

Gender: male
Posts: 162
*****
 
Very happy that they have the program back on track.

Don't think Apollo 11 was that much of a tragedy; but we know what you mean (Apollo 1).

It really depresses me to realize that the only people to have walked on the moon have already reached retirement. It should be the other way around.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Jul 26th, 2005 at 9:52pm

exnihilo   Offline
Colonel
Tempe, AZ

Posts: 189
*****
 
Gotta say I was glad to see the launch go off too, and especially that this is so far a safe mission.

That being said, I have to add that due to the choice of  not repairing Hubble, its basically a waste of money to fly the shuttle.  There is very little science being done on the space station; the science return from Hubble far eclipses anything that has been done, or will ever be done, at the space station.  This could all be redeemed by performing a final Hubble repair and upgrade.
 

300,000 KM/S - Its not just a good idea, its the law.
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Jul 27th, 2005 at 12:10am

beaky   Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA

Gender: male
Posts: 14187
*****
 
Woops; my bad. I meant Apollo One, not Eleven. Eleven was a triumph!!
As for ISS: think "stepping stone". The first crew in the first permanent Moon base will most likely be too busy surviving to do a whole lot of science, but learning how to live and work in space is science, when you think about it.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Jul 28th, 2005 at 11:13am

DJ_Zephyr   Offline
Colonel
MiX iT uP!
New Port Richey, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 219
*****
 
Jeez, the 30-year-old girl made it up again.  Glad they chose Discovery, always was my fave.  Hope her in-flight checkup goes well, and that they bring her down in one piece!

When are we gonna get our next-gen shuttle?  It's time for a   new launch vehicle, methinks.
 

...
AMD Athlon X2 4200+ dual-core- 2.2ghz per core
MSI GeForce 9400 GT- 550mhz core, 512mb VRAM
2gb DDR RAM, dual 17" monitors (one Acer panel, one KDS boat anchor)
Windows 7 Home Premium, DirectX 11, Realtek HD w/ Logitech X530 speaker set, Logitech G110 keyboard
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Jul 28th, 2005 at 2:05pm

exnihilo   Offline
Colonel
Tempe, AZ

Posts: 189
*****
 
I used to work at White Sands missile range back in the early 80's.  The big runway there, Northrup Strip, was an alternate landing site for the shuttle, so as an alternate site, we supported the early shuttle missions.  Eventually, the Challenger did land once at White Sands, in 1984 (2 years before it exploded on launch).

Working in Range Safety, I cleared the launching of weather sounding rockets which probed the upper atmosphere winds.    This was to support any potential landing there at White Sands.  Shocking to think that was 20 years ago, and the shuttle is still flying.
 

300,000 KM/S - Its not just a good idea, its the law.
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print