Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› Discovery in Orbit!!!
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Discovery in Orbit!!! (Read 354 times)
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 11:03am
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Just over 10 minutes ago, Discovery and her crew of seven lifted off in good but hot weather and just achieved orbit. According to the official TV network feed, everything's nominal.
They had a camera onboard the external fuel tank this time, with a view of the underside of the Shuttle and the front attach point... very cool viewpoint for watching that ride. Good to see that tank separate perfectly, after very clean SRB jettison... whew. Another new procedure: Pilot Eilleen Collins rolled Discovery just after the tank sep so that they can look for signs of insulation damage on the tank (results will not be available until later), and as they approach ISS this time, there will be another maneuver to present Discovery's belly for inspection by the crew of the ISS. I believe there is also a plan to use the payload arm to hang a camera over the side for a closer look before they get ready for deorbit.
Congrats and good luck to the whole team!! Woohoo!!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 11:08am
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
Fantastic.
Glad to see them finally back in the air.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 11:15am
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Quote:
Fantastic.
Glad to see them finally back in the air.
Really good to see the in
space
, too...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 11:17am
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
Quote:
Really good to see the in
space
, too...
Just an added plus
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 12:32pm
gn85
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 139
<<APPLAUSE>>
We have lift-off!! Looked awesome. That was a spectacular view from the camera on the ET. Fantastic!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 12:37pm
jrpilot
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 2255
Amazing how fast they were going.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 1:35pm
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
Excellent stuff. Now they just have to give the old bird the eyeball and make sure she is safe to come back down again!
Looks like NASA got it right 8)
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 2:23pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Well, they say bad things come in threes... after the tragedies of Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia, maybe NASA's due for a long run of safe manned flights...
At any rate, despite the occasional loss of manned or unmanned spacecraft, NASA usually does get it right.
«
Last Edit: Jul 27
th
, 2005 at 12:11am by beaky
»
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 4:28pm
gn85
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 139
They were saying it loses half of it's weight in the first few minutes of launch from the amount of fuel being burned up. WOW!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 5:14pm
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
Quote:
Well, they say bad things come in threes... after the tragedies of Apollo 11, Challenger, and Columbia, maybe NASA's due for a long run of safe manned flights...
Apollo 1 was pretty awful too.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 7:52pm
hatter
Offline
Colonel
hatter
Chicago, IL
Gender:
Posts: 162
Very happy that they have the program back on track.
Don't think Apollo 11 was that much of a tragedy; but we know what you mean (Apollo 1).
It really depresses me to realize that the only people to have walked on the moon have already reached retirement. It should be the other way around.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jul 26
th
, 2005 at 9:52pm
exnihilo
Offline
Colonel
Tempe, AZ
Posts: 189
Gotta say I was glad to see the launch go off too, and especially that this is so far a safe mission.
That being said, I have to add that due to the choice of not repairing Hubble, its basically a waste of money to fly the shuttle. There is very little science being done on the space station; the science return from Hubble far eclipses anything that has been done, or will ever be done, at the space station. This could all be redeemed by performing a final Hubble repair and upgrade.
300,000 KM/S - Its not just a good idea, its the law.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jul 27
th
, 2005 at 12:10am
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Woops; my bad. I meant Apollo One, not Eleven. Eleven was a
triumph!!
As for ISS: think "stepping stone". The first crew in the first permanent Moon base will most likely be too busy surviving to do a whole lot of science, but learning how to live and work in space
is
science, when you think about it.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jul 28
th
, 2005 at 11:13am
DJ_Zephyr
Offline
Colonel
MiX iT uP!
New Port Richey, FL
Gender:
Posts: 219
Jeez, the 30-year-old girl made it up again. Glad they chose Discovery, always was my fave. Hope her in-flight checkup goes well, and that they bring her down in one piece!
When are we gonna get our next-gen shuttle? It's time for a new launch vehicle, methinks.
AMD Athlon X2 4200+ dual-core- 2.2ghz per core
MSI GeForce 9400 GT- 550mhz core, 512mb VRAM
2gb DDR RAM, dual 17" monitors (one Acer panel, one KDS boat anchor)
Windows 7 Home Premium, DirectX 11, Realtek HD w/ Logitech X530 speaker set, Logitech G110 keyboard
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jul 28
th
, 2005 at 2:05pm
exnihilo
Offline
Colonel
Tempe, AZ
Posts: 189
I used to work at White Sands missile range back in the early 80's. The big runway there, Northrup Strip, was an alternate landing site for the shuttle, so as an alternate site, we supported the early shuttle missions. Eventually, the Challenger did land once at White Sands, in 1984 (2 years before it exploded on launch).
Working in Range Safety, I cleared the launching of weather sounding rockets which probed the upper atmosphere winds. This was to support any potential landing there at White Sands. Shocking to think that was 20 years ago, and the shuttle is still flying.
300,000 KM/S - Its not just a good idea, its the law.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.