Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› Landing practice for the space shuttle...
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
Landing practice for the space shuttle... (Read 407 times)
Jul 12
th
, 2005 at 9:20am
gn85
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 139
I was just watching the news this morning and they were saying how the astronauts were doing practice landings with the small Grumman jets. The reporter was saying that the space shuttle comes in considerably faster than a normal plane. Of course he didn't actually say at what rate the space shuttle or these practice jets come in at. Anybody have an idea??
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jul 12
th
, 2005 at 9:25am
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
On final she'll be a little faster but not significantly. But I believe during re-entry she can get up to Mach 20something. I'd have to check that but she is FAST!
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jul 12
th
, 2005 at 10:54am
gn85
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 139
Yes, I know it's moving pretty fast when it re-enters. Takes a whole continent to scrub off speed.
The way the reporter was talking, it sounded like he was referring to rate of decent moreso than actual airspeed.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jul 12
th
, 2005 at 6:09pm
OTTOL
Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)
Gender:
Posts: 918
Unless they've changed things....they used to use a Gulfstream II (not a Grumman) to practice landings. The aircraft has it's weight-on-wheels switches "squat switches" rigged to ground mode and they deploy the T/R's to duplicate the shuttle's steep descent profile.
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jul 12
th
, 2005 at 8:07pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
From Nasa KSC
HERE
, you can get more of the mission profile..........
Quote:
The approach and landing trajectory capture phase begins at the TAEM interface and continues to guidance lock-on to the steep outer glide slope. The approach and landing phase begins at about 10,000 feet altitude at an equivalent airspeed of 290, plus or minus 12, knots 6.9 nautical miles (7.9 statute miles) from touchdown. Autoland guidance is initiated at this point to guide the orbiter to the minus 19- to 17-degree glide slope (which is over seven times that of a commercial airliner's approach) aimed at a target 0.86 nautical mile (1 statute mile) in front of the runway. The spacecraft's speed brake is positioned to hold the proper velocity. The descent rate in the later portion of TAEM and approach and landing is greater than 10,000 feet per minute (a rate of descent approximately 20 times higher than a commercial airliner's standard 3-degree instrument approach angle).
At 1,750 feet above ground level, a preflare maneuver is started to position the spacecraft for a 1.5-degree glide slope in preparation for landing with the speed brake positioned as required. The flight crew deploys the landing gear at this point.
The final phase reduces the sink rate of the spacecraft to less than 9 feet per second. Touchdown occurs approximately 2,500 feet past the runway threshold at a speed of 184 to 196 knots (213 to 226 mph).
TAEM=Terminal Area Energy Management
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jul 12
th
, 2005 at 10:17pm
JBaymore
Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!
Gender:
Posts: 10261
19 degree glideslope
Flys like a brick.
I remeember lading that thing back in "Orbiter" days....... it just falls out of the sky.
best,
.................john
Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M, Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jul 12
th
, 2005 at 10:53pm
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Quote:
Unless they've changed things....they used to use a Gulfstream II (not a Grumman) to practice landings.
Technically, as I understand it, Grumman did start out the Gulfstream series - first with the G-159 Gulfstream I, then the G-1159 Gulfstream II ... with the passing of time, etc. the business aircraft became a separate business, Gulfstream American, etc. etc. So calling them "Grummans" may not be current, but not completely incorrect?
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jul 13
th
, 2005 at 6:26am
gn85
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 139
Thanks for the great answer. I was thinking of trying this with flight sim. Wow, that does come out of the air like a stone. It's a little decieving to watch on TV.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jul 13
th
, 2005 at 10:26pm
MattNW
Offline
Colonel
Indiana
Gender:
Posts: 1762
Quote:
19 degree glideslope
Flys like a brick.
I remeember lading that thing back in "Orbiter" days....... it just falls out of the sky.
best,
.................john
Things are a little better in the more recent releases with the improved atmosphere flight model but it still feels like trying to fly an 18 wheeler.
In Memory of John Consterdine (FS Tipster)1962-2003
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jul 14
th
, 2005 at 6:30am
jrpilot
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 2255
What would happen if they had to do a go around?, since there speed would drop very fast.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jul 14
th
, 2005 at 9:12am
gn85
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 139
Quote:
What would happen if they had to do a go around?, since there speed would drop very fast.
Don't think there is such a thing as a 'go-around'. Can't engage engines obviously. They have 10,000 ft. of runway and don't exactly have to worry about 'traffic'.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jul 14
th
, 2005 at 1:59pm
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
Buran had a planned go-around capability... the one that was parked in Sydney has the engine stuff for flight testing, but a go-around system most likely would look the same
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jul 15
th
, 2005 at 6:54am
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Quote:
What would happen if they had to do a go around?, since there speed would drop very fast.
gn85 is right: Landing the Orbiter is a one-shot deal, because at that point, it's a big glider. But between the flight control computers and the skill of the pilots, they usually make very precise landings; don't think there's ever been an overrun or anything like that, despite the fact that it comes over the fence at speeds in excess of 200 mph.
Here's a link I found to an article about the Gulfstream program...
http://www.aviationnow.com/content/ncof/lo_nfm05.htm
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jul 18
th
, 2005 at 11:57am
Chris E
Offline
Colonel
home airports-KUGN-KPRC
Chicago
Gender:
Posts: 151
yeah, once they are coming in, they are coming in, no stopping it, no go arounds, nothing
Commercial MEL/SEL
ERAU Prescott Aerospace Engineering
Flight Minor
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jul 18
th
, 2005 at 9:41pm
beefhole
Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia
Gender:
Posts: 4466
Quote:
They have 10,000 ft. of runway and don't exactly have to worry about 'traffic'.
They've gotta have more than 10,000' at the landing sites-I know Titusville is 15,000.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.