Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
History
› Corsair Vs. Me-109...
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
Corsair Vs. Me-109... (Read 906 times)
Reply #15 -
Jul 6
th
, 2005 at 6:01am
Heretic
Ex Member
Anyone with a IL-2:FB/PF merge could try that.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Jul 6
th
, 2005 at 10:15am
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Quote:
Could this be, in any way, simulated to any degree of accuracy in the sim? (I'm willing to bet the 109 would win...cos its definetly better.)
A.
Andrew - it happens "all the time" in online combat sims like Warbirds and Aces High.
Typical scenario - 190G vs F4U-1D (or C). The outcome ALWAYS depends on the skill of the pilot(s) involved and the specific dynamics.
Ex. Who wins a dogfight between a Bf.110 fully loaded with bombs and a La-7? Situation, 110 and La.7 are heading towards each other, 110 about 3000ft higher. at about 27K
Answer: Bf.110. - the La-7 never even realized I was in the area, so I split-essed and popped him at 500 yds (and slightly below) before he knew what was going on.
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Jul 6
th
, 2005 at 11:27pm
Flt.Lt.Andrew
Ex Member
ok ok ok , calm down!
Sometimes....*shakes head*
A.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Jul 7
th
, 2005 at 9:21am
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Quote:
ok ok ok , calm down!
Sometimes....*shakes head*
A.
LOL - If you do the *test*, don't let me be the 109 pilot, I'd sorely disappoint you!
<And I won't even tell you about the time I got a Hog (F4U) driver low and slow, and plinked him to death in a Ki.43 (Oscar w/2 mgs)>
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Jul 8
th
, 2005 at 2:27am
Flt.Lt.Andrew
Ex Member
pinkled? Thats a new word....
Is it just me, or do the Japanese planes seem to be a cut below the rest- and I'm not talking about the Zero...
A.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Jul 8
th
, 2005 at 7:21am
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Quote:
Is it just me, or do the Japanese planes seem to be a cut below the rest- and I'm not talking about the Zero...
A.
"plinked" comes from the sound "plink" made when you shoot at tin (or aluminium cans) with smal caliber (bb, pellet, etc) guns.
You bring an interesting point on the Japanese planes. The design philosophy behind the Japanese fighters was maneouverability and range. The main Japanese Army fighters, the Ki.27 and Ki.43, were armed with just two machine guns, typically 2x 7.7mm or 1x7.7mm and 1x12.7mm. Cannon armament, in response to the heavier armored US bombers, was introduced with the Ki.44, Ki.84 later in the war. By the end of the war, the Army had the Ki.61 (Hien) and Ki.100 and others, but it was too little too late.
A similar philosophy in the Imperial japanese Navy produced the A6M Zero series. It's main strengths were range and maneouverability - and pilots that could make that plane dance. As the war progressed, and more armor, guns, etc. was added to the basic design, performance suffered. Again, teh IJN came out with some excellent planes (Mitsubishi Raiden, for example) but too little, too late. Towards the middle/end of the war, the design philosophy was becoming " Americanized" - tough, heavy guns, with speed and armor, but the production logistics were too much in shambles to support the needed level of activity.
I wouldn't say the Japanese planes were "a cut below" but rather, they were made to a different drum beat.
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Jul 8
th
, 2005 at 11:13am
denishc
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 1018
Just as a side note, many Japanese pilots criticized the newer aircraft like the Ki-44 and Raiden for their LACK of maneouverability.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Jul 12
th
, 2005 at 5:52am
H
Offline
Colonel
2003: the year NH couldn't
save face...
NH, USA
Gender:
Posts: 6837
The same thing happened back in WWI -- even Manfred vonRichthofen made the complaint. A pilot gets used to the handling of one plane and then has to get used to the charactersitics of a new one.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Jul 13
th
, 2005 at 4:37am
H
Offline
Colonel
2003: the year NH couldn't
save face...
NH, USA
Gender:
Posts: 6837
Quote:
...agitatory-is that even a word?...
(Just for the info, no: try "agitative" -- which I'm hoping you won't take this as being
)
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History ««
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.