Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print
The Cold War (Read 2359 times)
Reply #30 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 12:46pm
Hype   Ex Member

 
I don't check the history boards as often as I'd like...I do love me the history.  lol

I was also going to stay out of this one, but I can not.

There are several misrepresentations in this thread regarding the current conflicts with terrorist organizations.

1.  They have no aim.  They do in fact have a goal.  It's to destroy all that they despise.  What is it they dislike?  Anything even remotely western in nature.  Capitalism, freedom, equality and the like.

2.  Negotiate with them.  You don't negotiate with terrorists.  Doing so accomplishes nothing.  The most you can do is talk them out of releasing hostages, say in a hijacking situation.  When you're dealing with people who will strap bombs to their children for cash, there isn't much you can do in the way of discussion.  Second, as was mentioned, there is no official representative.  al qaeda is NOT an officially sanctioned organization.  There's no one that can be contacted.  (Not that it really matters, they wouldn't be interested in negotiating even if it were a productive means of resolution.)  Also of importance is a reminder that since al qaeda isn't a governmental body, they are considered to be illegal enemy combatants under the Geneva Convention.  As such, the GC does NOT apply to them.

3.  The media wants you to believe that terrorists are only trying to destroy western culture.  No, the media wants us to believe that they are a legitimate military force protected by the Geneva Convention, and are simply trying to defend themselves.  There were 19 men aboard four airliners that weren't defending anything.  They were on an offensive mission.  They put us in defense mode.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #31 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 12:57pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
2.  Negotiate with them.  You don't negotiate with terrorists.  Doing so accomplishes nothing.  

The british army fought the IRA from 1916 to about 1995. Negotiations have since persuaded them to stop random bombings and the are allegedly decomissioning their weapons while there hasn't been a major IRA attack since the Omargh bombing in 96. Anyone who says negotiations accomplish nothing is very wrong.
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #32 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 1:06pm
Hype   Ex Member

 
I present you with my typical response to "negotiation doesn't work".

I'm going to virtually hit you over the head with a baseball bat.  I'm going to continue hitting you, beating you essentially into a pulp.

While I do this, I'm going to ask you to have a few of your friends standing beside us, politely asking me to stop.

In the mean time, I'm still beating you silly, and they're still asking.

Eventually, a bigger, stronger guy comes along and yanks me off of you, throwing me to the ground, where I break my leg.

Now I ask you.  Which worked better?  Negotiation or a strong arm?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #33 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 1:18pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
The problem with that analogy is that the bigger, stronger guy doesn't exist. Tongue
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #34 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 1:22pm
Hype   Ex Member

 
I think it's safe to say that the United States is bigger and stronger than a renegade terrorist force in the middle of the desert.  Turn off the network news and you'll have all the evidence you need to support that.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #35 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 1:24pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
This should explain their aims. http://observer.guardian.co.uk/worldview/story/0,11581,845725,00.html

Quote:
You don't negotiate with terrorists. Doing so accomplishes nothing.

Difficult to see how negotiation is possible in this case but to permanently solve any genuine grievance you have to talk in the end.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #36 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 1:24pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
It may be bigger and stronger but it's fighting a force it cannot see. Sure you've invaded Afganistan and Iraq all in the name of defeating terrorism but Ql Quaeda is still out there and so is Bin Laden. There is still conflict between the Isrealis and the Palistinians and I don't see much change in the state of world terrorism post 9/11 as it was before. Tongue
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #37 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 1:31pm
Hype   Ex Member

 
Talk to someone who has been there and done the job.  They'll be able to show you that the outlook over there isn't nearly as bleak as some would have you believe.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #38 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 1:47pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
I would advise you to follow that link Hagar supplied and read all of it. Then reconsider how bleak it looks.

Don't think that just because there have been few attacks since 9/11 that you are beating them. Remember that there were extremely few attacks before and that Bin Laden attacked the twin towers in 1993. And how many attacks came after that before 9/11. As I said, inaction does not mean they are beaten. Not by a long way.
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #39 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 1:51pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
I assume you're talkiing about Iraq which is a separate issue. As I understand it the occupying forces are faced with many problems which could take years, even decades to resolve. It's impossible to discuss this properly without bringing politics & religion into it. This thread seems to have strayed way off-topic anyway.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #40 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 1:58pm
Hype   Ex Member

 
Quote:
It's impossible to discuss this properly without bringing politics & religion into it. This thread seems to have strayed way off-topic anyway.


Agreed...so I'm going to leave it alone with this. 
 
As for facing problems that could take a while to fix, you're completely right.  We knew that from the beginning it wasn't going to be an easy battle.   

Need I remind anyone how long the American Revolution was fought?  How about the Civil War?  World War I?  How about World War 2, Korea or Vietnam?  Then lets compare the raw casualty data for all of those conflicts in contrast to this one.

In the age of instant gratification, it's easy to call something a failure when it doesn't happen in a month, or even a year. 

Nothing worth having comes easily.  If it did, it wouldn't be nearly as desirable.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #41 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 2:01pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:




In the age of instant gratification, it's easy to call something a failure when it doesn't happen in a month, or even a year.  


It's also easy to call something a success. Which i'm afraid is what you're calling the war on terrorism as it stands. Tongue
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #42 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 2:09pm
Hype   Ex Member

 
It's a work in progress, but things ARE moving forward as evidenced by the long lines at the recent elections, the successful election of leadership and the formation and training of a (less corrupt) military and police force.   Factor in the expulsion of a corrupt, genocidal dictator and you've had yourself a good couple of years.

There are some people who think that it's either a failure or a success, there is no "right direction" for it to be going.  This isn't true.  Until it's done, it can't be deemed complete.  Until it's complete, you can't call it a collective failure or success.

But pound for pound, day by day, we've had considerable success.  That to me makes it all worthwhile.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #43 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 2:10pm
Heretic   Ex Member

 
Quote:
I think it's safe to say that the United States is bigger and stronger than a renegade terrorist force in the middle of the desert. 


David vs Goliath. And we all know how this story turned out in the end.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #44 - Jun 17th, 2005 at 2:12pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
You're still talking about Iraq. Al Qaeda is a global organisation with cells in many different countries. As Woody points out, it's very difficult to fight a war when you don't know who or where the enemy are or where they will strike next.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 ... 7
Send Topic Print