Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Expert hard drive help.. (Read 157 times)
May 7th, 2005 at 3:07pm

Jimbo   Offline
Colonel
Jimbo's Flight Simulation
Tours
South Yorkshire, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 3052
*****
 
Well after sorting my hard drive upgrade out Cheesy, my friend now has a similar issue, which i need backing up on.
He currently has a very loud Maxtor drive
Found here:

http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products/index.html?action=c2hvd19wcm9kdWN0X292ZX...

He wishes for an upgrade, maybe a seagate, just as i have got one aswell.
He likes this one, but im not sure wheather is faster or slower than the one he's already got.
Here it is:

http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products/index.html?action=c2hvd19wcm9kdWN0X292ZX...

Now this also appeared to me that this is a ATA/100, the maxtor he has now is a ATA/133. Any difference?
IF you click on the product specs it tells you all about it all.
Also if the product has a seek time of 9.5 and another at 8.5, which is the fastest? i know it sounds stupid!
Anyone help? I told him to go with the seagate, but until he found that it had a ATA/100 he wasn't sure. So been my self i thought i might just be able to get some advice off the simv community. Grin

ME and my pal thank you in advance, and enjoy the rest of your weekend. Smiley

Thanks.

Jimbo Wink Smiley


 

..Jimbo's Tours, MORE info in the MULTIPLAYER SECTION
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - May 7th, 2005 at 4:15pm

Dan   Offline
Colonel
Meet Bogart! Thanks CRAIG!
Carmarthenshire, Wales, Uk!

Gender: male
Posts: 2053
*****
 
ATA 133 is faster than 100. And the samller the seek time is the better.
My choices of drive would be between a Raptor (Which Im going to get) becasue of its sheer speed, or a Western Digital Caviar 7200rpm drive - I have the 160Gb version.

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/acatalog/westerndigital_sata.html

I just love all the WD hardrives as they seem to be fairly quiet (Unlike the Raptor) and nice and fast at 50.2Mb/sec.

Maxtor's and seagates are both supposed to be good, so thats me £00.02!  Wink
Dan
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - May 7th, 2005 at 4:37pm

Jimbo   Offline
Colonel
Jimbo's Flight Simulation
Tours
South Yorkshire, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 3052
*****
 
Thanks Dan, will take a gander 8)
 

..Jimbo's Tours, MORE info in the MULTIPLAYER SECTION
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - May 7th, 2005 at 8:44pm

Jared   Offline
Colonel
I'd rather be flying...
Uniontown, Ohio

Gender: male
Posts: 12621
*****
 
I also happen to have a number of the Seagate Barracuda drives at 7200rpm and ATA133 as well.. Wink

They work wonderful for me.. Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - May 8th, 2005 at 4:41am

Delta_   Offline
Colonel
Woah!
London, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 2032
*****
 
I also recommend the WD Caviar range, very reliable.  I used a WD hdd in my first built system and it still works just as good now, i built it 7 years ago.  It is currently being heavily used by my sister. I use 2 WD caviar drives in my current system.

Seek time: is the time it takes to find data on your drive, lower is better.

I would not worry too much about the difference between ATA100 and ATA133, it is not noticeable at all, because programs really don't push HDDs enough to use 133MB/s data rate.

I found this WD drive, it is ATA100, 8MB buffer and 7200rpm.
http://www.ebuyer.com/customer/products/index.html?rb=7339906838&action=c2hvd19w...
 

My system:Intel Q6600@3.6GHz, Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR2-6400 (4-4-4-12-1T) , Sapphire 7850 OC 2BG 920/5000, X-Fi Fatality, Corsair AX 750, 7 Pro x64
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - May 10th, 2005 at 12:44pm

Jimbo   Offline
Colonel
Jimbo's Flight Simulation
Tours
South Yorkshire, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 3052
*****
 
Well the WD has a seek time of 8.9 ms and the seagate has a time of 8.5, but the WD is £5 extra. So which one's the best? Is it down to own preference or whatever?

Jimbo
 

..Jimbo's Tours, MORE info in the MULTIPLAYER SECTION
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - May 10th, 2005 at 6:48pm

Delta_   Offline
Colonel
Woah!
London, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 2032
*****
 
Quote:
Well the WD has a seek time of 8.9 ms and the seagate has a time of 8.5, but the WD is £5 extra. So which one's the best? Is it down to own preference or whatever?

Jimbo


Quite simply when comparing two products so similar, yes it is down to preference. Wink
 

My system:Intel Q6600@3.6GHz, Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR2-6400 (4-4-4-12-1T) , Sapphire 7850 OC 2BG 920/5000, X-Fi Fatality, Corsair AX 750, 7 Pro x64
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print