Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› The end of Warbirds?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
The end of Warbirds? (Read 1058 times)
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 9:57am
Wing Nut
Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!
Gender:
Posts: 14173
This can't be anything but bad. Imagine all the vintage aircraft that are going to be grounded if this takes effect...
From the Premier Site's news section...
Quote:
AOPA urges FAA not to abandon "orphaned" aircraft
AOPA is warning that proposed changes to FAA airworthiness standards could make it virtually impossible to update or restore many older GA aircraft.
In comments filed this week in response to an FAA notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on the Standard Certification of New Aircraft, AOPA points out that the proposed rule does not allow the remanufacture or alteration of older aircraft whose type certificate or supplemental type certificate is no longer supported by a manufacturer. Such aircraft are commonly referred to as "orphans."
"As the GA fleet ages, more and more of our aircraft are becoming dependent on alterations and restorations to keep them flying," said Luis Gutierrez, AOPA director of regulatory and certification policy. "This proposal would make such changes impossible for orphaned aircraft. So when original parts are no longer available, many classic airplanes will be grounded, even though they could be flown for years to come with appropriate modifications."
The proposed rule also would stop the restoration of many antique and military aircraft that are rebuilt from spare or surplus parts
after having been declared destroyed or demolished. And it could make the purchase and maintenance of imported aircraft more expensive by requiring manufacturers who hold a type certificate to hold a production certificate as well.
AOPA is asking the FAA to retain the methods that have allowed the owners of orphaned aircraft to keep their airplanes flying safely in the past and to protect the restoration of aircraft that have been classified as demolished or destroyed. The association also is urging the FAA to allow imported aircraft kits and major assemblies to be put together without requiring a production certificate.
«
Last Edit: Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 3:05pm by Wing Nut
»
HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives
If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 9:59am
Gunny04
Offline
Colonel
Who's Better than the
best when nobodys the
best?
Michigan
Gender:
Posts: 2101
are they crazy? Man if that went through it'd be fought hard prolly....... Thats just not right I dont think! Cheers, Gunny
AMD athlon 3800 Venice Socket 939 64 bit at 2.4Ghz, 6100K8MA-RS Foxconn Motherboard, 1gb (2X512) OCZ Platinum PC3200 Ram, EVGA 8800GTS 640MB OC, 500 Watt NZXT psu, and Windows Vista Ultimate Total hard drive space 530gb
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 10:13am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
older aircraft whose type certificate or supplemental type certificate is no longer supported by a manufacturer. Such aircraft are commonly referred to as "orphans."
I'm not up with the current CAA/JAA regulations on this but taken literally it could affect a lot of GA aircraft & airliners, never mind warbirds. I wonder if the DC-3 is still supported by the manufacturer. In the UK many of these aircraft operate under a "Permit to Fly" which is less restrictive than a full C of A. It can be used for private purposes & even display aircraft but you couldn't operate under this certification if you carry paying passengers.
http://www.caa.co.uk/application.aspx?categoryid=33&pagetype=65&applicationid=11...
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 10:31am
Wing Nut
Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!
Gender:
Posts: 14173
I was thinking the same thing, except I was wondering about the 707 or the 727...
HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives
If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 11:45am
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
These Byzantine regs. really tick me off. Any aircraft should simply be required to meet airworthiness standards. Period.I have a hard time believing that a part is more likely to cause an accident because it was removed in good condition from another aircraft that was subsequently destroyed. I understand the concern , but it's the wrong way to go about it. Owners of older "orphan" birds already pay thru the nose for insurance, even though the accident stats really don't seem to indicate that aging airframes and engines are more dangerous than newer ones ...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 12:33pm
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
Sounds like the Federal A$$hole Authority are out to get people. How many people here can afford a brand new Cessna?
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 2:15pm
chomp_rock
Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.
Gender:
Posts: 2718
WTF?! That is crazy! That means DC9s, DC8s, DC3s, 707s, 727s, MD11s, MD/DC10s, DC8s and not to mention all warbirds would be grounded!
AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 3:09pm
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
Protectionism...
Protect your own industry (Cessna) by keeping the cheaper competition from getting a certificate that allows sensible operation
For example
AN-2 vs C208, An-2 is cheaper and can carry more.
Yak-18 and Yak-52 vs C172 and C182, Yak-18 seats 4 too in standard spec but gives aerobatic capabilities.
What this will do for Technoavia (they are building a redesigned Yak-18 as the SM-2000P and a 750HP turboprop version of it that is fully aerobatic certified) i don't know.
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 10:48pm
OTTOL
Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)
Gender:
Posts: 918
Not that big a' deal, for the the warbirds anyway. Certify as experimental ...........keep flying.
Most of the parts for the old warbirds have to be fabricated anyway. Other than parts support, what other reason do you need to maintain standard certification?
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 11:24pm
TacitBlue
Offline
Colonel
That's right, I have my
own logo.
Saint Joseph, Missouri, USA
Gender:
Posts: 5391
It kinda sounds like the FAA is purposely trying to piss people off.
A&P Mechanic, Rankin Aircraft 78Y
Aircraft are naturally beautiful because form follows function. -TB
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Apr 17
th
, 2005 at 11:53pm
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Quote:
What this will do for Technoavia (they are building a redesigned Yak-18 as the SM-2000P and a 750HP turboprop version of it that is fully aerobatic certified) i don't know.
More sales - The redesigned Yak-18 is a NEW design/ production, not an "orphan". Now, once Technoavia STOPS supporting what it made, then there's a problem.
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Apr 18
th
, 2005 at 12:17am
SilverFox441
Offline
Colonel
Now What?
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Gender:
Posts: 1467
Even GA types can be certified as Experimental...it just affects Fare-Paying Pax and insurance rates after all...besides allowing uncertified mechanics (like hobbyists) to work on the plane.
Steve
(Silver Fox)
Daly
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Apr 18
th
, 2005 at 11:17am
OTTOL
Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)
Gender:
Posts: 918
Quote:
Even GA types can be certified as Experimental...it just affects Fare-Paying Pax and insurance rates after all...besides allowing uncertified mechanics (like hobbyists) to work on the plane.
That's where I was going. To me it makes more sense
to
certify as experimental. It would be much cheaper and actually prolong the life of a warbird.
As far as GA, I wasn't forgetting about them, just focusing on the key topic. But, while you're on the subject, unless you plan on keeping the airplane for life, recertifying your 172 or Cherokee as experimental would probably be a bad idea due to a much lower resale value.
When you get into the "big stuff", some of the airliner airframes can amass anywhere from 50-100,000 hrs in a few short years. It's probably safer and more cost effective that they
are
forced to retire these planes.
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.