Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
Better in real life than in fs? (Read 1433 times)
Feb 19th, 2005 at 2:56pm

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
I was never a fan of flying small, prop aircraft in fs for two reasons-one, my joystick sucked and it made controlling it a bitch (that's been resolved now). Two, I was always more into commercial aviation.

Anyways, with my solo coming up, I figured I'd load up a flight at my airport (Wings-in the game it's N67, in real life it's KLOM) and do a curcuit or two.

And man did I suck.

It was terrible, I was all over the place. The very first time I flew a traffic pattern in real life I nailed it, and I've probably flown like 30 since. And you mean I can't get one good pattern in on fs?

I was wondering if any other RL pilots here had noticed that they flew better in real life than on the sim.
« Last Edit: Feb 19th, 2005 at 10:06pm by beefhole »  
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 3:15pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Yep - real life aircraft are easier to trim, and you can fly visual attidudes much better with greater peripheral vision, and you get proper feedback from the controls...

Charlie
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 4:20pm

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
True Charlie, but the insurance is much cheaper on FS, and the way you drive Harvards that HAS to be a good thing Wink Grin
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 5:02pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Quote:
True Charlie, but the insurance is much cheaper on FS, and the way you drive Harvards that HAS to be a good thing Wink Grin


That was only taxing though...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 6:07pm

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
YES, flying is MUCH easier in real life. Especially aerobatics and helos! Here are some of the advantages:

Being able to look around
Peripheral vision
Being able to feel movements
Things are much easier to see
Real controls, no mouse clicking or keyboards to slow stuff down
better instruments (more detailed and easier to see)

There are more but I'm short of time.
 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 6:11pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
...but then you add fuel management, emergencies, birds, weather, birds, getting lost, air sickness, weather, examiners and more birds...

... then you wish you were back in front of the PC with Flight Sim again!

Oh, and I forgot - ATC... Wink

Charlie
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 9:27pm

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
Quote:
...but then you add fuel management, emergencies, birds, weather, birds, getting lost, air sickness, weather, examiners and more birds...

... then you wish you were back in front of the PC with Flight Sim again!


I sure as hell don't!

Plus I'm quite fond of the ATC, they've helped me too many times for me not to be!
 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 9:34pm

Saratoga   Offline
Colonel
757/767 Captain   Major,
USAF
Dallas-Ft. Worth Intl. (KDFW)

Gender: male
Posts: 571
*****
 
Yup I fly a great deal better in reality than in the sim. All the reasons above are very true, strange though, throw in adjusting radios, talking to ATC, flying obviously, flaps, gear, it should be harder in reality. But for me, it seems much easier to fly in the real world.

(Then again, in reality there are passengers in the back who probably have no problem breaking my nose if I screw up)
 

Pilot for a major US airline certified in the: EMB-120, CRJ, 727, 737, 757, 767, and A-320 and military, T-38, C-130, C-141, and C-5 along with misc. other small airplanes. Any questions, I'm here for you.
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 10:23pm

Rocket_Bird   Offline
Colonel
Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 1214
*****
 
i think the thing about real life in comparison of the sim is the complications.  Its easier to fly in real life because you can feel your airplane.  However, theres a lot of factors you have to worry about, and at times it feels like you can't always fly the way you want to fly.  At the airport, im busy feeling the push because theres airliners holding short waiting for me in my little cessna 172 to get off the ground for example!  Grin  Gotta love class B airspace  Grin  Though I kinda wish I didnt live so close to the city at times.
 

Cheers,
RB

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 10:33pm

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
Good to see I'm not the only one... Grin

And rocket, just out of interest, if you really wanted to, couldn't you move out to one of the three gazillion smaller airports around big cities? I know I personally wouldn't enjoy operating a 172 in class B.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 10:55pm

Rocket_Bird   Offline
Colonel
Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 1214
*****
 
I could, but i need money to move out too  Grin

It made my training kinda slow in certain areas, but its a good learning experience to operate in a busy airport.  Dodging heavies, avoiding jet blasts, talking to ATC whose always yabbing away, tuning so many different frequencies,argh hehe
 

Cheers,
RB

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Feb 19th, 2005 at 11:50pm

Mobius   Offline
Colonel
Highest Point in the Lightning
Storm
Wisconsin

Posts: 4369
*****
 
Something I have noticed is that if I take a 172 up in FS for a quick jaunt around my home airport (C29) in Wisconisn, it's cool for a little while, but then I get kind of bored, but when I fly for real, I could stay up there for ever, if it weren't so expensive Tongue.  But flying for real is alot easier, especially landing, you can really feel your speed and the controls and everything and flaring a foot above the ground and slowly letting it settle is alot easier for real because you can see so much more.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Feb 20th, 2005 at 12:05am

Saratoga   Offline
Colonel
757/767 Captain   Major,
USAF
Dallas-Ft. Worth Intl. (KDFW)

Gender: male
Posts: 571
*****
 
Yes, the feeling is great of real flying.

I am with Mobius. Flying a 172 around in FS gets old fast. The municipal airport I fly out of sits right on the line (literally it bisects the airport) of the Class-B airspace around Dallas, Texas. So our takeoff procedures either way involve a quick turn to the east before climbing above 4,000 feet. In FS, it's no big deal, I can fly over Dallas VFR with my radios off and ATC is like "whateva." And I miss the controller in the tower at my airport, he is a nice guy lets us do a lot of fun stuff and throws a joke in occasionally. Big change of pace to finish an airline flight with those serious busy controllers at DFW then come home and be laid back.

Just, FS needs more depth. More real world feel, not the perfect enhanced robot feel it has right now. But it's a sim, what are we to ask of it? It's pretty good for the technology available. And, if all else fails, rent a 172. Nothing is as beautiful as sunrise in an airplane.
 

Pilot for a major US airline certified in the: EMB-120, CRJ, 727, 737, 757, 767, and A-320 and military, T-38, C-130, C-141, and C-5 along with misc. other small airplanes. Any questions, I'm here for you.
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Feb 20th, 2005 at 12:40am

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
I'll tell ya one thing, ATC and other pilots sure don't sound, or talk, like they do in fs. It took me a long time to learn that its ok to shorten my calls, and drop the "-er" on "niner". My CFI told me "just talk to them like they're human beings-they're not some perfect robot entity", and I remember replying "heh, in fs they are!" Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Feb 20th, 2005 at 12:47am

Saratoga   Offline
Colonel
757/767 Captain   Major,
USAF
Dallas-Ft. Worth Intl. (KDFW)

Gender: male
Posts: 571
*****
 
lol beautiful beef. Ya it didn't take me long to figure out that controllers who read you you're taxi clearance were perfectly satisfied if you replied with "taxi 35, 3 tango bravo". Fair enough. But no, the sim it would be, "Taxi to and hold short of runway 35 using taxiway Charlie, Delta, Tango 1, Tango 3, Delta, Foxtrot, Mooney November five five three tango bravo." Roll Eyes
 

Pilot for a major US airline certified in the: EMB-120, CRJ, 727, 737, 757, 767, and A-320 and military, T-38, C-130, C-141, and C-5 along with misc. other small airplanes. Any questions, I'm here for you.
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print