Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
Operating System (Read 250 times)
Jan 25th, 2005 at 1:33pm

jimclarke   Offline
Colonel
So many add-ons....so
little time.....
Arizona

Gender: male
Posts: 636
*****
 
Which O/S provides the best performance for running M$FS (FS98 and up)?  I have XP SP2 right now but would I be better off with something else...?

Thanks,

Jim
 

No God? Know God!
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jan 25th, 2005 at 2:39pm
ATI 9700pro   Ex Member

 
XP SP1. Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jan 25th, 2005 at 7:27pm

Tchkinjiu   Offline
Colonel
"Toph"
Aberystwyth

Gender: male
Posts: 1187
*****
 
Quote:
XP SP1. Wink


boo, i have xp sp2, and it runs just fine. Plus it added the virus protection because I have AMD 3000? or higher. Anyhoo, you can see some of my pics in freeware and payware, and it runs beautifully  Wink
 

"Have compassion for all beings, rich and poor alike; each has their suffering. Some suffer too much, others too little."
...
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jan 26th, 2005 at 1:59am

the_autopilot   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 1359
*****
 
SP2 hands down.

It offers a bunch of fixes you can't do without (or at least i can't)
 

Link to sig:&&Click here&&(Cannot post signature here due to current forum restrications on linked images).
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Feb 24th, 2005 at 11:50pm

compyelc4   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 29
*****
 
May I ask another question in this regard?

I am currently running an overclocked AMD Athlon 64 3200+, 512DDR, MSI K8T NEO, overclocked MSI FX5500 Vid w/ 256M on Win ME, DX9c.

FS9 has never been more stable with great FR's. Of course I just dumped an AMD Athlon 900mhz and Win98!

Will WinXP really give me a significant FS9 performance increase over WinME. I've heard that WinME is pure crap, but I have not found that to be the case.  At this point, I don't know whether to spring for WinXP upgrade at $99, the WinXP full-install at $139 or just wait for Win64 and blow a much bigger wad!!

Thanks

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Feb 25th, 2005 at 7:34am
Heretic   Ex Member

 
Microsoft should be sued for the creation of Win ME, but that's a different topic.
You should definately switch to XP, since it's more modern and its hardware support is better.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Feb 25th, 2005 at 9:59am

_526th_Fireman   Offline
Colonel
S~ to all fair and honorable
pilots. S~!!
Joshua Texas

Gender: male
Posts: 1148
*****
 
compyelc4, I wouldn't upgrade, I would do a full-clean install of XP. I had heard many problems when people went the upgrade route. Too many mixed and unmatched files between the two systems.

Don't bother with 64bit right now. IT is still going to be several years, if not more before that whole system, games, peripherals, drivers etc. are all up to snuff for a 64 bit system.

512 MB of RAM is the bare minimum for XP in my opinion. More RAM would be a definate plus. With FS9, todays and tomarrow's games, 1 MB is minimum as far as I am concerned.

Then there are tons of tweaks you can perform for XP to really make her zing. Love mine, and I had ME. ME was always stable for me, no problems at all. Might have been a security issue, but XP didn't solve that either.

XP is worth installing, trust me.
 

Systemax Sabre Ultimate gaming rig.&&&&I got all the goodies and all the power I need to run anything thrown at me for the next two months!
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Feb 25th, 2005 at 10:26pm

sonic   Offline
Colonel
North Carolina,  US

Posts: 820
*****
 
XP sp2 to me anyway My machine runs better with sp2 for some reason. Grin
 

&&Specs&&E6300, 3 gigs 800 Ram, 8800GT oc, 400gig Sata drive, Windows XP Pro 64 Bit..
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Feb 27th, 2005 at 5:17pm

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
SP1....I found that SP2 gives me redundant protections and slows me down.  Not worth it to me.
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print