Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Graphic Gallery
›
Photos & Cameras
› Duxford...
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
Duxford... (Read 597 times)
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 5:56am
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
The purpose of my visit, Historic Flyings IAC-161 (having engine tests this particular Wednesday), they kindly let me photograph her for information pertaining to project Binky, and even let me sit in the front cockpit (I don't think I could have squeezed in the back!) She is a Tr.9 in Irish Air Corps colours, gorgeous
A P-51B is reborn 8)
A Spit minus her Merlin...
The office of Concorde
Lightning nearly completely restored, I had a brief involvement with this one as an Air Cadet a loooong time ago, nice to see her back together 8)
TSR.2, there are no words 8) 8) 8)
Some twit bolted the Stearman to the ceiling
The utterly evil looking SR-71
Some of these shots are a little grainy, sorry I really haven't fully mastered my digital camera yet
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 6:02am
ATI 9700pro
Ex Member
A twin seated Spit....yuk!
They aren't restoring that TSR...are they? Please tell me they are...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 6:14am
Mr. Bones
Offline
Colonel
Posts: 4304
nice photos Mark! I really want to see that Blackbird. it could been exposed a little better, but it's a real blackbird so no need to complain.
about that grainy aspect of your photos. well, those are taken inside in bad light conditions. I guess you switched your camera to some kind of automatic mode. there, the camera automatically picks a higher ISO speed. result: grainy photo, otherwise known as noise. especially with compact digicams with a smaller CCD, the noise becomes visible very fast, even at rather slow ISO speeds.
Raw power...the J-58.&&
&&&&
My Anet collection.
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 6:21am
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
The TSR is nearly complete!!!
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 6:39am
ATI 9700pro
Ex Member
Quote:
The TSR is nearly complete!!!
Airworty??
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 6:42am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
I would be surprised if they planned to fly it again. You never know though, it could join the ranks of the high speed taxi run aircraft.
Great shots Mark i really have to get to Duxford.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 6:58am
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
I don't know what the score is with the TSR.2, but the chaps said the Lightning might fly again.
Hagar reckons they won't be allowed whilst she has afterburners... some silly regulation or other
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 7:38am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Nice shots Mark.
As I understand the current regulations, privately owned military jets fitted with afterburners are not allowed to fly - period....! There's a gorgeous MiG 21 sitting in a shed at the Midland Air Museum, Coventry Airport because of this regulation. It was airworthy when it arrived as it was flown in there. I believe that Air Atllantique originally hoped to display it on the air show circuit. What a sight that would have been. The museum gave it a home after they gave up on the idea. I don't know how they will get around this one with the Vulcan XH558.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 7:52am
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
Although it would be on helluva thing to see in the air the TSR2 won't fly. Remember it was only a prototype and when it got cancelled it was cancelled in a way that would never allow it to be restarted.
As for the lightning, that would be brilliant on the airshow circuit. Though that too is unlikely as the government doesn't want them things in our airspace anymore. So you've got to go to South Africa to see one flying.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 12:39pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
Although it would be on helluva thing to see in the air the TSR2 won't fly. Remember it was only a prototype and when it got cancelled it was cancelled in a way that would never allow it to be restarted.
Quite right Woody. It's all very well to get sentimental over these aircraft but you have to be realistic. The TSR.2 might have had potential but it was very far from ready to enter service. It had been plagued with technical problems, made worse by a complete lack of communication between interested parties & interference from the government. Not the best way to design a revolutionary aircraft. This was made worse by the fact that it would have been impossible to meet the original specification. This is nothing unusual with ministry specifications & the reason some of the most successful aircraft have been private ventures.
In the event, only one prototype of the TSR.2 ever flew & this went supersonic once. I can't find the exact number of test flights carried out but this could have been less than 20. The two survivors, one now on display at Cosford & the example at Duxford have never flown. I'm not sure either was even completed but all surviving aircraft were disabled in such a way to ensure the project couldn't be resurrected at a later date. Basically, a lot of vital internal equipment was ripped out & destroyed. This would make an airworthy TSR.2 a pipe-dream.
I found 2 interesting sites with a brief history of the aircraft. Also some nice photos.
http://www.thunder-and-lightnings.co.uk/tsr2/history.html
http://www.spyflight.co.uk/TSR2.htm
The accounts vary slightly but both describe a sad story of incompetence, blundering & political intrigue. The project was doomed from the start. IMHO
PS. Plenty of other aircraft projects were cancelled in the 1950s & 60s. Some looked more promising than others but it's all a "what if" situation. There's no guarantee the TSR.2 would have been one of the successful ones.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 1:30pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
At least with your TSR.2 you still have a visible copy of your National Aviation Dream.......
You know where our dreams are on this side of the Atlantic..........the XB-70 is in Dayton for the US Dream, but for Canada the dream remains a dream..........alas, nothing to see but a few bits and pieces at Rockcliffe, and a few flying models of the fabulous CF-105 !
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 1:38pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
As you say, it's all a dream. Two symbols of the destruction of a once-thriving aircraft industry on both sides of the Atlantic. That's how I look on it.
Ah well, this is all history now. Just lumps of metal after all. Over & done with. No sense in harping on about it.
PS. Personally, I think the Hawker P.1154 would have been the way to go.
http://www.harrier.org.uk/history/history_p1154.htm
I prefer it to the TSR.2. & with Sidney Camm's track record I think it stood a far better chance of succeeding. At least we got the Harrier - eventually. Imagine a supersonic version of that in the late 1960s or even the 70s.
«
Last Edit: Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 2:51pm by Hagar
»
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 4:04pm
zeberdee
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Sunny Bradford Yorks uk
Gender:
Posts: 469
Quote:
A Spit minus her Merlin...
-[
OK Mark PUT IT BACK.. NOW!!! you know they know who's got it!!!
If your not part of the answer your part of the problem! &&I've often wanted to drown my troubles, but I can't get my wife to go swimming. &&&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 4:15pm
C
Offline
Colonel
Earth
Posts: 13144
Quote:
I don't know what the score is with the TSR.2, but the chaps said the Lightning might fly again.
Hagar reckons they won't be allowed whilst she has afterburners... some silly regulation or other
TSR 2 will be off to the AirSpace hanger, or whatever it is they're calling the extended superhanger.
As for types being airworthy again, the CAA (Civil Aviation Authority/Campaign Against Aviation
)would only let an aircraft fly again with the backing of the OEM, ie BAE SYSTEMS in its current guise. So in short, no.
The Vulcan will hopefully be a step in the right direction, and will hopefully be the first "complex" warbird to fly in private hands. The DH Sea Vixen was a step in the right direction (mainly as I think they go it classed as an "intermediate" type), and maybe in time we'll se a Bucaneer or the like...
Charlie
PS, great to see the T. IX...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jan 9
th
, 2005 at 4:36pm
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
Alas Chris they checked the weight of my luggage on the return flight
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras ««
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.