Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print
A380 painted and with full 4 engines (Read 1134 times)
Reply #30 - Jan 16th, 2005 at 5:37pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
Assuming they dont cancel it first. I dont know the latest, on that though.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #31 - Jan 16th, 2005 at 5:53pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Quote:
Assuming they dont cancel it first. I dont know the latest, on that though.


Very doubtful they'd cancel it, even if the current US Government is emphasising the Army more than the USAF/USN/USMC... If fact that may have a beneficial effect for the JSF/JCA if the F-22 order is scaled down a lot. Both countries will need the aircraft come 2012 to replace ageing fleets (by that time the Harrier concept will be nearly 50 years old as a aircraft and engine - ok, the current airframes date from the late 80s/early 90s, and it's still a very capable aeroplane), and with the number of export orders and industrial involvement as well, I suspect this would be very unlikely...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #32 - Jan 16th, 2005 at 5:57pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
I think alot of it could be decided by the F/22 situation. Also here the carrier situation could decide lot of it. Theres still a huge debate going on about the super carriers, and its actually risking the project altogether apparently. You have better contacts than i do, so you might be able to confirm this, but the latest news i heard, was that they are strongly considering only building 1 carrier now.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #33 - Jan 16th, 2005 at 6:03pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Quote:
I think alot of it could be decided by the F/22 situation. Also here the carrier situation could decide lot of it. Theres still a huge debate going on about the super carriers, and its actually risking the project altogether apparently. You have better contacts than i do, so you might be able to confirm this, but the latest news i heard, was that they are strongly considering only building 1 carrier now.


Your guess is as good as mine... at least we'll be having it for land based occupations too...
Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #34 - Jan 17th, 2005 at 2:58am

krylite   Offline
Colonel
ftg VA LH584

Posts: 89
*****
 
Here's a recent cnn article on the a380. As suggested, looks like they're looking into reducing the paint weight to about 60% of normal...

http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/0001%2F20050116%2F15524...
 

...&&Waiting for the Queen, PMDG!&&ega-GeForce FX5200 128mb DDR AGP8x
IP Logged
 
Reply #35 - Jan 17th, 2005 at 12:49pm

Enola Gay   Ex Member
Forza Lazio!!

Gender: male
*****
 
has any been to the Airbus website recently, they have really cool countdown timer.  8)

www.airbus.com

cheers,
ashar
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #36 - Jan 17th, 2005 at 3:34pm

beefhole   Offline
Colonel
common' yigs!
Philadelphia

Gender: male
Posts: 4466
*****
 
Ha, did you see the "Win an A380" thing? I'm gonna win it and put it in my garage for safekeeping.  Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #37 - Jan 18th, 2005 at 12:27pm

-sam-   Offline
Colonel
. .. ...
EDDM

Gender: male
Posts: 608
*****
 
Hi there,

http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,337281,00.html

In that article (german) you will find some pictures showing the
A-380 in itīs new livery at itīs "rollout" (it didnīt move a
meter Smiley) today.
click on the row of 3 pictures to open the gallery.

By the way.. a technican pointed yesterday on TV that the
A-380 will be 5 tons heavier than planed

cheers
 

NFo/Simviation Multiplayer Server.&&&&fs.netfrag.org:23456&&&&Stats: fs.netfrag.org&&Teamspeak: ts.netfrag.org
IP Logged
 
Reply #38 - Jan 18th, 2005 at 3:02pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
Very doubtful they'd cancel it, even if the current US Government is emphasising the Army more than the USAF/USN/USMC... If fact that may have a beneficial effect for the JSF/JCA if the F-22 order is scaled down a lot. Both countries will need the aircraft come 2012 to replace ageing fleets (by that time the Harrier concept will be nearly 50 years old as a aircraft and engine - ok, the current airframes date from the late 80s/early 90s, and it's still a very capable aeroplane), and with the number of export orders and industrial involvement as well, I suspect this would be very unlikely...

If british aviation was today what it was in the 60's the Harrier would be supersonic by now.  And if the P.1154 project wasn't cancelled then the Harrier would have been supersonic from the very outset. As I see it, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. And the Harrier certainly ain't broke. I mean, at least it can take off from a carrier. Which puts it one step ahead of the JSF. Grin
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #39 - Jan 18th, 2005 at 3:04pm

Archer <]-   Offline
Colonel
Home Airport: KBDL
Connecticut, United States

Gender: male
Posts: 180
*****
 
 

Dell Dimension 2400
&&Pentium 4 @ 2.53 GHz; 533MHz FSB, 512 DDR PC2100 RAM, &&Windows XP, Integrated Sound, 2.1 Flat Panel Speakers, Onboard GXF, Saitek Cyborg Evo&&...&&&&
G
o
o
g
l
e
's
latest move to take over the world...&&Click Here!&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #40 - Jan 18th, 2005 at 5:17pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Quote:
If british aviation was today what it was in the 60's the Harrier would be supersonic by now.  And if the P.1154 project wasn't cancelled then the Harrier would have been supersonic from the very outset. As I see it, if it ain't broke, don't fix it. And the Harrier certainly ain't broke. I mean, at least it can take off from a carrier. Which puts it one step ahead of the JSF. Grin


Until the carriers disappear...
Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #41 - Jan 19th, 2005 at 2:40pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Which would see the Sea Harrier retired, the JSF cancelled, and ultimately scrapped completely because one of the biggest buyers has backed out. Grin
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #42 - Jan 19th, 2005 at 3:27pm

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Quote:
Which would see the Sea Harrier retired, the JSF cancelled, and ultimately scrapped completely because one of the biggest buyers has backed out. Grin


I imagine we would still go ahead with our order even if we didn't get the two new carriers - we have 2 bases of Gr7s to replace...
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #43 - Jan 25th, 2005 at 3:29am
Asda_price   Ex Member

 
Little beauty...

Will be dominating the skies soon enough! 8)

Cheers,

Rob
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #44 - Jan 26th, 2005 at 10:25am

Homer Simpson   Ex Member
Forza Lazio!!

Gender: male
*****
 
exactly when is the first test flight? ive heard people say in the end of March or the beginning of April ???
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 
Send Topic Print