Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
128 or 256 mb video card (Read 280 times)
Oct 12th, 2004 at 10:57am

flyboy0413   Offline
Captain
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 3
***
 
I'm looking to get a new video card in the near future.  Probably an ATI 9800pro or a Nvidia 6800.  Question is:

Is 128MB enough or should I spend the extra money and get the 256MB version?  What benefits will the 256MB version provide?  Is it worth the 50-$100 cost increase?  Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Oct 12th, 2004 at 11:14am

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
The amount of ram on the card is not the primary consideration, but only a choice to be made when more important decisions have been made.

An ATI 9800 pro for instance, is not in the same league as a NV 6800, no matter what ram is fitted.

The RAM quality actually has more effect on performance than quantity as well, but this subject gets a bit techy.

Suffice to say that different manufacturers use different quality components, so careful research is needed to make an informed choice.

Performance comparison charts between the various video cards are an easy way to shortcut the research, but beware, the card you buy may appear to be the one you wanted, but check the fine print carefully. Let the buyer beware.

Prices can be misleading also, use this site as a general guide, once you have made a choice.

www.pricewatch.com

Good Luck   Smiley
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Oct 12th, 2004 at 11:47am

flyboy0413   Offline
Captain
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 3
***
 
ok.. but say I stick w/ a 6800 for instance.  What do I get by going w/ the 256mb?  Better image quality?  Faster frame rates?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Oct 12th, 2004 at 12:12pm

Delta_   Offline
Colonel
Woah!
London, UK

Gender: male
Posts: 2032
*****
 
Quote:
ok.. but say I stick w/ a 6800 for instance.  What do I get by going w/ the 256mb?  Better image quality?  Faster frame rates?


You won't see a benefit with games right now, although a 6800 it is powerful enough to utilise the extra memory.  It is simply a matter of the card being a bit more future-proof, so when games that need more memory come out can use it.  Generally it is only good to get 256MB or higher (there will be 512MB coming out soon) if you have a high-end card like the 6800/x800 as they have enough power to use the extra memory efficiently.
 

My system:Intel Q6600@3.6GHz, Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR2-6400 (4-4-4-12-1T) , Sapphire 7850 OC 2BG 920/5000, X-Fi Fatality, Corsair AX 750, 7 Pro x64
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Oct 12th, 2004 at 12:24pm

Gixer   Offline
Colonel
Lets go fly a kite!!

Posts: 1540
*****
 
Depends on the games  Grin  The likes of Far Cry and Doom 3 will benefit greatly from it.

Also some games out now can not be played anywhere near the settings that the new gen cards can.  I run COD @ 1600x1200 with 4xAA and 16xAF all bells and whistles etc and it holds over 60fps all the time (Its limited to 60 by v-sync)  But yes it also is far more future prood than current cards too.

An important thing is to also make sure you get cards with the highest bandwidth too.  i.e. there are 128BIT and 256BIT memory interface cards out there.  The 256bit ones will work more efficiently. 

As with most PC parts just save as much as you can and get the best you can afford at the time!!
 

AMD64 3500+ @ 2200MHz 400FSB&&MSI K8N Neo 2 mobo nForce3 chipset&&1gig Corsair XMS PC3200 timings @ 10.2.2.2 &&XFX 6800 Ultra @ 450/1200&&80gig HDD&&Loadsa fans!!!
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Oct 12th, 2004 at 4:57pm

Iroquois   Offline
Colonel
Happy Halloween
Ontario Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 3244
*****
 
What Gixer said. More memory is always good to have. Once again it's all up to what you can afford. However, with a 6800 or X800, that 256mb would be worth it.

I think Apple had it right with expandable VRAM rather than built in.  Don't you wish you could do that today, pop a 1gb DDR into your videocard. Thoes vintage computers had some good stuff in them.
 

I only pretend to know what I'm talking about. Heck, that's what lawyers, car mechanics, and IT professionals do everyday. Wink&&The Rig: &&AMD Athlon XP2000+ Palomino, ECS K7S5A 3.1, 1GB PC2700 DDR, Geforce FX5200 128mb, SB Live Platinum, 16xDVD, 16x10x40x CDRW, 40/60gb 7200rpm HDD, 325w Power, Windows XP Home SP1, Directx 9.0c with 66.81 Beta gfx drivers
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Oct 12th, 2004 at 5:37pm

4_Series_Scania   Offline
Colonel
He who laughs last, thinks
slowest.
Stoke on Trent England U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 3638
*****
 
256MB 9800 against a 128MB 6800 is a no brainer, the 6800 every time.


Doom3 on a 256MB 6800 GT looks stunning, it looks equally stunning on a 128MB 6800, I've built systems with both cards, I'm not joking!

Even the 6800LE (The basic variant) will considerably outperform any 9800 128 or 256MB.

As I say, its a no brainer.
 

Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print