Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Specific Aircraft Types
› SE5, SE5A, Camel, Bristol
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
SE5, SE5A, Camel, Bristol (Read 1926 times)
Sep 27
th
, 2004 at 11:01pm
Flying Trucker
Ex Member
I seem to have loaned or perhaps given away several very good books I had purchased on aircraft of the First World War.
Question:
Did the SE5 or SE5A ever have twin mounted machine guns like the Camel?
If not then why not, I know they had an upper weapon but why not twin mounted weapons like on most German aircraft or the Camel.
Did the Bristol F2B ever have machine guns mounted like the Camel, I know the observer had a weapon but what about forward firing weapons.
I remember reading that the SE5A and the Bristol F2B served in many corners of the Commonwealth well after the First World War ended. Do you think or know if their armament might have changed?
They are two of my favorite aircraft, I would give my wife and children AND I would talk Mr. Fozzer into cooking for you for a week to fly in a real one.
All comments welcome...thanks.
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Sep 27
th
, 2004 at 11:14pm
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Typcial standard armament was 1 vickers and 1 Lewis, with the Vickers offset to port.
Post war service was with New Zeland, Australia, USA, the RAF, but the main immediate post-war fighter was the Snipe. Many SE5as made a second life as sky-writers.
The Brisfit had a "totally enclosed" vickers .202 firing through a blast tube in the center top of the the radiator, as well as the "observer's" guns.
Post war, the Brisfit was used well into the late '20's and some into the early '30s, as Army Cooperation aircraft, later replaced by such types as the Hawker Hind, etc. A few examples were even flown by the Spanish Republicans.
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 12:08pm
Flying Trucker
Ex Member
Thanks Felix
Would that be a .303 rather than a .202?
I was wondering why they did not arm the SE5A or Bristol with two forward firing machine guns, like the Camel.
Was it perhaps that the Vickers Machine Gun was better than what the German Military used?
It would seem to me with two weapons it would be easier to shoot down the other aircraft and probably better at destroying sea or ground targets.
It would seem to me the Royal Flying Corps or Royal Air Force had some very good aircraft, but poorly armed.
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 12:37pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
Would that be a .303 rather than a .202?
I was wondering why they did not arm the SE5A or Bristol with two forward firing machine guns, like the Camel.
Hi Doug. The SE.5a did have 2 forward-firing machine guns, the Vickers on a fixed fuselage mounting & the Lewis on an adjustable mounting above the centre-section. (I forget the name of the mount, maybe Felix can remind me.)
http://www.gwdt.freeserve.co.uk/royal_aircraft_factory_se_5a.htm
Both were .303 calibre & could fire various types of ammunition - including "Brock" and "Pomeroy" explosive bullets & "Buckingham" incendiary rounds. These were very often mixed depending on the target. This might seem a light armament but it was obviously thought adequate. I believe some pilots modified their aircraft by fitting extra guns.
The Lewis was intended to be fired in the conventional forward position but could be pulled down on the mounting to change the ammunition drum. It was used to great effect firing upwards by Captain Albert Ball & others. (The Home Defence nightfighters also used this method against the "Zeppelin" raiders.) I have a photo of this mounting somewhere. I'll have to search for it.
PS. Not the photo I was thinking of but this profile shows the Lewis in the vertical position. The aircraft is a BE.2c nightfighter of No. 39 (Home Defence) Squadron circa 1916.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 1:14pm
Flying Trucker
Ex Member
Thanks Doug
I was just wondering because the British Fighters always seemed lightly armed compared to the German Aircraft. (excluding the Camel)
I wonder if the Vickers and the Lewis on the SE5A could be fired in unison?
Thanks for posting that BE2c another one I would love to fly in.
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 1:32pm
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Quote:
Thanks Doug
I was just wondering because the British Fighters always seemed lightly armed compared to the German Aircraft. (excluding the Camel)
I wonder if the Vickers and the Lewis on the SE5A could be fired in unison?
Thanks for posting that BE2c another one I would love to fly in.
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Given the "armour" of the period, one machine gun was "good" enough. Yes, the Vickers and Lewis could be fired together. The most popular Lewis mounting (for top wing mounting) was the Foster mounting, which allowed to release the gun to travel back on the track so the pilot could clear jams/reload the drum, etc.
Variations of the tilted guns, as shown on the BE2c above, were also used on the Sopwith 1-1/2 Strutter single seat night fighters (twin Lewis) and the (Hagar, help me on this) "Comic Camel" night fighter (which I believe did NOT have the "hump".
As a side note, the not-to-successful (compared to other models) Nieuport 28 was a twin gun design, except the it had the one centrally located in front of the pilot, but the other was on a shelf to port, there not being enough space between the cabane.
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 2:17pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
Variations of the tilted guns, as shown on the BE2c above, were also used on the Sopwith 1-1/2 Strutter single seat night fighters (twin Lewis) and the (Hagar, help me on this) "Comic Camel" night fighter (which I believe did NOT have the "hump".
First I've heard of it.
I learn something new on this forum every day.
I found this after a quick search.
http://www.rodenplant.com/HTML/407.htm
The original Comic seems to have been a modified Sopwith 1 1/2 Strutter & the name was later used for the nightfighter version of the Camel - the Sopwith Comic. Strange name for an aeroplane.
Quote:
Captain F.W. Honnett, Flight Commander of "A" Flight No. 78 Sqn (HD) RFC, suggested a modification of one of the 1½ Strutters by moving the pilot's seat and all the controls into the observer's position, his argument being poor visibility from the regular pilot's seat. The original pilot's position was faired over, and the plane was equipped with a night searchlight.
The first three 1½ Strutters modified to the new standard by the Southern Aircraft Repair Depot joined 78 Sqn in September 1917. During the night raid over London on the night of October 31st/November 1st 1917 they opposed twenty-two enemy Gothas. 78 Sqn pilots dubbed this unusual plane the 'Comic fighter'. Initially the armament of this aircraft consisted of only a single course Vickers gun; later Comics were equipped with a Lewis gun on a flexible Foster mounting. It should be also mentioned that at least one aircraft, namely B762, had two Lewises on a special fixed mounting and could fire at a 70° angle.
1½ Strutter Comics were intensively used by 78 Sqn until February 1918, flying night intercept missions against Gothas and Giant R-planes. Due to the poor performance of this type, it was never put into series production. At the beginning of 1918 the night fighter version of the famous Sopwith Camel (which ironically received the official name Sopwith Comic) replaced the 1½ Strutter Comic and other obsolete night-fighters in many Home Defence units.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 4:15pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Again not the one I was thinking of. I took this shot at the Shuttleworth Pageant earlier this month. It's a genuine SE.5a (not a replica) & shows the Lewis gun on the Foster mount quite well. (You can also see the gunsight in front of the windscreen.) The gun was fired by a cable attached to the joystick.
One of my famous "carrot chops" but I knew it would come in handy some time.
PS. I'm now a member of the SVAS which means I can visit the museum free of charge any time I wish. I can take some static close-ups of the collection aircraft on my next visit if anyone wants them. I'm not sure when this will be as it's a 2 1/2 hour drive.
PPS. Found it.
This is the Foster mount on the SE.5a with the Lewis locked in the normal position. It has a different type of gunsight to the one in my photo. The trigger cable shows up clearly.
According to the file name this a similar mount on a Nieuport. I believe the chap in the photo is Lt. William Leefe-Robinson who shot down the first German airship to be destroyed over Great Britain. (Not in the Nieuport but a BE.2c nightfighter very similar to the one I posted earlier.)
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 5:01pm
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
I found out this weekend that an ancestor of mine was responsible for the destruction of a Zeppelin.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 5:04pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I found out this weekend that an ancestor of mine was responsible for the destruction of a Zeppelin.
Hope he wasn't the pilot - or the flight engineer.
PS. Do they call an airship pilot a pilot?
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 5:13pm
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
Oh no. He was doing it for King and Country and in a flying machine of his own.
And I think an airship pilot is a Captain is he not?
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 5:21pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
I think it was done on the same basis as a ship. The Captain gave the orders but the airship was steered by a helmsman.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Sep 28
th
, 2004 at 10:33pm
Flying Trucker
Ex Member
I remember seeing something and I can't remember where...but...there seemed to be two large wheels in the pilot house (gondola) of the airship...one facing forward with an operator and one facing to port with an operator.
The one facing forward (they were like ships wheels) was for the rudder operator and the one facing to port was for the elevator operator.
There was also a throttle man (engineer station), radio station and navigators station.
I do not recall seeing a seat for the Captain and I think the area in the gondola was to small for one.
I will try to find that picture.
The older submarines I think operated with two separate wheels.
I do believe the modern airship and submarine have a control yoke and operate much like a modern aircraft.
Thanks for all the inputs everyone...the information is well received and sometimes amazing
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Sep 29
th
, 2004 at 9:41am
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Quote:
I do believe the modern airship and submarine have a control yoke and operate much like a modern aircraft.
Thanks for all the inputs everyone...the information is well received and sometimes amazing
Cheers...Happy Landings...Doug
I believe that the Goodyear "blimps" still use separate elevator wheels, which are recovered from blimp to blimp as they are retired and a new one is placed in service. Current elevator wheels date back to the patrol blimps of the '40s.
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Sep 29
th
, 2004 at 10:09am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I remember seeing something and I can't remember where...but...there seemed to be two large wheels in the pilot house (gondola) of the airship...one facing forward with an operator and one facing to port with an operator.
The one facing forward (they were like ships wheels) was for the rudder operator and the one facing to port was for the elevator operator.
There was also a throttle man (engineer station), radio station and navigators station.
I do not recall seeing a seat for the Captain and I think the area in the gondola was to small for one.
I will try to find that picture.
The older submarines I think operated with two separate wheels.
Come to think of it the conventional airships we're discussing were controlled very much like the older submarines. The comparison is very appropriate.
Quote:
I believe that the Goodyear "blimps" still use separate elevator wheels, which are recovered from blimp to blimp as they are retired and a new one is placed in service. Current elevator wheels date back to the patrol blimps of the '40s.
Interesting Felix. My only experience with blimps is a short trip in the Airship Industries "Shamu" during a visit to Florida some years ago. As I remember it had conventional "aircraft type" controls (yoke & rudder pedals) & could be flown by one crew member although a co-pilot was on board ours. The Airship Industries blimps are controlled (ascent & descent) by tilting the engines. I don't know how they would be steered, maybe by engine revs. I don't think they have a conventional rudder or other moving control surfaces like the Goodyear blimps.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types ««
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.