Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
how many memory ? (Read 1012 times)
Jul 7th, 2004 at 4:47am

jeff55   Offline
Colonel
Vive les week-ends !
France

Gender: male
Posts: 38
*****
 
Hi all,
I use to fly with FS for about 12 years now, but never could get a good frame rate when approaching of detailled sceneries or airports. My computer is : AMD Atlon XP 2400+ with 512kB of ram 333Mhz DDR, windows 98se and a Geforce 4 ti4800 as video board on a 8x AGP connector. I have been told by many computer sellers that Windows 98 cannot manage with more that 256 Mb of memory, is it thru ? or can FS9 manage with more memory. The actual frame I can get is from 40 or more on simple landclass down to 10 to 12 on more complex scenery ?
would it be efficient to add more memory as I could see on some of your computers specifications ?

Jeff ???
 

jeff55
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 4:58am

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
Win98 is limited to 512mb, so you are at your limit, to add more you'll have to change your OS to XP.

Ozzy
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 5:09am
EA_KATL   Ex Member

 
Thats correct Ozzy 512mb is win 98s and win me limit i learnt that the hard way back in my win 98 days.FrJeff if you would move up to win xp and add as much ram as you mother board will handle you will see a big improvement then what you have now.my mother board will handle 2 gigs of DDR ram but i am at 1 gig and i think thats plenty to get the job done.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 10:51am

Gixer   Offline
Colonel
Lets go fly a kite!!

Posts: 1540
*****
 
Yup as said get XP then 1gig of ram.  You will need that much coz XP alone eats up 200meg of it  Shocked  I did notice a big difference when I went from 512 to 1gig though.
 

AMD64 3500+ @ 2200MHz 400FSB&&MSI K8N Neo 2 mobo nForce3 chipset&&1gig Corsair XMS PC3200 timings @ 10.2.2.2 &&XFX 6800 Ultra @ 450/1200&&80gig HDD&&Loadsa fans!!!
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 1:19pm

garymbuska   Offline
Colonel
I would rather be flying
Jacksonville, Florida

Gender: male
Posts: 2850
*****
 
Quote:
Thats correct Ozzy 512mb is win 98s and win me limit
I am currently using windows ME and it has a max memory of 768 Megs not 512 it has 3 slots each capable of holding 256 meg ram DDR
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 1:51pm

Gixer   Offline
Colonel
Lets go fly a kite!!

Posts: 1540
*****
 
Gary, it doesnt matter how many slots you have its the software that limits it.  Your mobo could probably take far more than ME can handle, though I do believe 98se and ME will run on 768 though I am unsure if it handles it well. 

I seem to remeber Fozzer runnin 768 on 98se or ME and hes has no probs, dont quote me on that though as its just from memory.
 

AMD64 3500+ @ 2200MHz 400FSB&&MSI K8N Neo 2 mobo nForce3 chipset&&1gig Corsair XMS PC3200 timings @ 10.2.2.2 &&XFX 6800 Ultra @ 450/1200&&80gig HDD&&Loadsa fans!!!
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 2:17pm
EA_KATL   Ex Member

 
Thats what i had win 98SE and i unknowingly tried to run over the 512mb and my computer started doing things it shouldnt be doing.its in the FAQ on microsoft web site and it states running over 512mb with win98SE  and win me will cause major problems with the opperating system.but ever since i got win xp i havent looked back.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 3:14pm

garymbuska   Offline
Colonel
I would rather be flying
Jacksonville, Florida

Gender: male
Posts: 2850
*****
 
I currently running 642 megs and have no problems. I understand what you are saying but the system specs for the model I have will support 768 megs of ram I have a pentium 3 running at just under 1 Gig (978) or something like that. I think that it might be the athlon or cellaron chips that have this limit. I had a amd processor and it could only handle 64 megs of ram but this used windows 95.
If the software wont support anyhting above 512 than why put the slots to allow you to put 768 meg. What is it supposed to do with the extra 256 megs of ram.
I am certain that it is the cpu that determines how much ram you can have as they can only address so much.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 3:50pm

Sterk   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 316
*****
 
garymbuska,may be what you say is correct,but only in cases when there is a big gap between proc power and memory-like,say,500 Mhz processor and 1Gb memory-wich is ridiculous,but if you have 1.5 Ghz processor and more(and no matter Amd or Intel) you can quietly put 1 gb memory or more and it'll be handled.First thing that limits memory size it's mom-then-os(windows).
 

...&&&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 5:07pm

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
Quote:
If the software wont support anyhting above 512 than why put the slots to allow you to put 768 meg.


Because computers are mass produced, and the builder of the computer doesn't necessarily know what mobo and/or OS you're going to install.
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 5:15pm

Fozzer   Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.

Posts: 24861
*****
 
Quote:
Gary, it doesn't matter how many slots you have its the software that limits it.  Your mobo could probably take far more than ME can handle, though I do believe 98se and ME will run on 768 though I am unsure if it handles it well.  

I seem to remember Fozzer running 768 on 98se or ME and hes has no probs, don't quote me on that though as its just from memory.


Hi Gixer...!
You are right my old Mate...!
768 Mb DDR memory on Win '98 SE...no problemo...!
...and I find it really needs it to run the Flight Sims smoothly without running short of memory... Grin...!

Cheers all...!

Paul...happy Win '98 SE user....with loadsa memory...!

See my specs below... Wink...!

 

Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Jul 7th, 2004 at 11:36pm

oldhorse   Offline
Colonel
Missouri

Gender: male
Posts: 68
*****
 
I Came a cross this Awhile back, Have not try it.
      Rich

This thread came up before, but it was stated that W98 and W98SE would not support more than 512MB. It will.

Just enter in system.ini a VCache section (heading surrounded by square brackets) and in it include MaxFileCache=262144. You can max that at 524288, but I thought I'd leave it lower. Seems to work OK and will antivirus, firewall, trojan-protection, necessary backround stuff, I have about 500 MB free after start-up with 88% sys and user resources.

In the 386 Enhanced section supposedly entering MaxPhysPage=40000 will let have a GB of ram in there, but apparently this does not work for all and I elected the conservative route by using 256 for the second chip set.

Another by trial addition to reduce async swap-file writing in the background is to add ConservativeSwapfileUsage=1 in the 386 Enhanced section. This _MAY_ improve stutter cases and is specific to each machine config whether there will be improvement or not.

MSMVP author's site with lot's of hints for all MS Win Versions is http://www.aumha.org/.
 

[/img]
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Jul 8th, 2004 at 3:52am

jeff55   Offline
Colonel
Vive les week-ends !
France

Gender: male
Posts: 38
*****
 
Hi all,

 

jeff55
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Jul 8th, 2004 at 3:54am

jeff55   Offline
Colonel
Vive les week-ends !
France

Gender: male
Posts: 38
*****
 
Hi all,

Thanks for your advices, I have now to experiment !

Regards,

Jeff. Cheesy
 

jeff55
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Jul 8th, 2004 at 6:08am

jeff55   Offline
Colonel
Vive les week-ends !
France

Gender: male
Posts: 38
*****
 
Hi everybody,

I did not have time yet to get some more memory, but could make some tests anyway. On my computer I have Norton System Works. This software contain some monitoring features which can report the current activity of physical and virtual memory and CPU load an so on. The result is that when FS9 run, the physical memory (512KB) is not fully used ( 120MB to 150Mb free according to the situation). But the CPU activity is constantly at 99 to 100%. This make me think that the problem may have more to do with the CPU itself.
What do you think ?

Jeff  Shocked
 

jeff55
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print