Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Graphic Gallery
›
Photos & Cameras
› Varig Log 727 Low at altitude
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
Varig Log 727 Low at altitude (Read 1190 times)
Reply #15 -
Jun 22
nd
, 2004 at 5:18pm
Scottler
Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA
Gender:
Posts: 5989
Well now for some reason the original link isn't working, but from what I can recall, is it not possible that the photo Kevin posted is the original (e.g. real) photo, then the plane was photoshopped into another shot, thus making the original topic shot a fake?
Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&
www.google.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Jun 22
nd
, 2004 at 5:26pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
Anets down for maintanence till tomorow i believe. The original shot wasnt a fake it was one of a series
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Jun 22
nd
, 2004 at 5:34pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
Well now for some reason the original link isn't working, but from what I can recall, is it not possible that the photo Kevin posted is the original (e.g. real) photo, then the plane was photoshopped into another shot, thus making the original topic shot a fake?
It's real enough. That shot Kevin posted is taken from a different angle & possibly by a different person. You lot are so used to faking stuff yourselves you can no longer recognise the real thing when you see it. LOL
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Jun 22
nd
, 2004 at 6:37pm
Scottler
Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA
Gender:
Posts: 5989
lol probably.
Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&
www.google.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Jun 22
nd
, 2004 at 8:06pm
Rivers
Offline
Colonel
As Real As It Gets
São Paulo Brazil
Gender:
Posts: 513
This is real, its an air show as pointed before, the plane is not landing, I’ve seen this before (not exactly this one) with my own eyes.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Jun 24
th
, 2004 at 5:00am
Silver1SWA
Offline
Colonel
Morgan Hill, Ca. (SF Bay Area)
Gender:
Posts: 703
1. It's not a fake!
2. As mentioned above, it is doing a low pass as a display, and is NOT landing.
3. The link does not work because
www.airliners.net
is down for maintenance.
4. All photos on that website are 100% genuinely REAL. They have an extensive, and rigorous screening process leaving only the highest quality shots to get accepted and displayed.
www.airliners.net
is a highly reputable source for airliner pictures, and aviation-related discussion.
P4 3.20Ghz 800Mhz FSB&&1 GB PC3200 400Mhz DDR RAM (Dual Channel)&&Nvidia GeForce 6800GT 256MB 8X AGP&&SB Audigy MP3+&&Win XP Pro
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Jun 24
th
, 2004 at 5:46am
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
...And besides it's made by swedish people, and we are 100% genuine (
), the owner is really a nice chap and would never accept 'fraud' pictures, you have no clue how many pics that are rejected.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Jun 24
th
, 2004 at 5:47am
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
...And besides it's made by swedish people, and we are 100% genuine (
), the owner is really a nice chap and would never accept 'fraud' pictures, you have no clue how many pics that are rejected.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Jun 24
th
, 2004 at 7:10am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
4. All photos on that website are 100% genuinely REAL. They have an extensive, and rigorous screening process leaving only the highest quality shots to get accepted and displayed.
www.airliners.net
is a highly reputable source for airliner pictures, and aviation-related discussion.
I suggest that this is debatable. Some fakes are so good they would pass all but the most careful scrutiny.
However, before accusing anyone of faking photos, ask yourself why any photographer worth the name would risk their reputation by submitting a fake.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Jun 24
th
, 2004 at 7:29am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
Anet has had its share of fakes but usually someone notices quickly and it will be removed quickly. I feel their standards are a little to high though, unless you can afford some pretty expensive equiptment and are an expert at post processing your image will be rejected 90% of the time
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Jun 24
th
, 2004 at 7:33am
Nexus
Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...
Gender:
Posts: 3282
Quote:
Anet has had its share of fakes but usually someone notices quickly and it will be removed quickly. I feel their standards are a little to high though, unless you can afford some pretty expensive equiptment and are an expert at post processing your image will be rejected 90% of the time
Also that's why the site is the best out there IMO...many pics are rejected but I'm not really fond of browsing thru blurry amateur photos with poor lighting and so on.
My 2 centinos
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Jun 24
th
, 2004 at 7:40am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I'm not really fond of browsing thru blurry amateur photos with poor lighting and so on.
My 2 centinos
Better steer clear of my topics in this forum then.
PS. They might not be perfect but at least I can guarantee that none of my photos are fakes.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Jun 24
th
, 2004 at 7:41am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
LOL its not so much the blurred photos i have a problem with, yes they should be rejected. Its when they are rejected for being slightly off center or a tree in the background is off center. I personally am liking myaviation.net, it brings some really interesting photos to the public you wouldnt usually see due to their poor quality. Theres only so many times i can bare to look at a 777 on final approach to heathrow from the exact same angle. Or heaven forbid a DC10 from the back at schipol, they have a bad double reject, then why are there 70 photos of united 777's approaching heathrow same color same angle.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Jun 24
th
, 2004 at 11:00am
Silver1SWA
Offline
Colonel
Morgan Hill, Ca. (SF Bay Area)
Gender:
Posts: 703
Quote:
LOL its not so much the blurred photos i have a problem with, yes they should be rejected. Its when they are rejected for being slightly off center or a tree in the background is off center. I personally am liking myaviation.net, it brings some really interesting photos to the public you wouldnt usually see due to their poor quality. Theres only so many times i can bare to look at a 777 on final approach to heathrow from the exact same angle. Or heaven forbid a DC10 from the back at schipol, they have a bad double reject, then why are there 70 photos of united 777's approaching heathrow same color same angle.
I agree. Myaviation.net seems to be a little more "down to earth".
P4 3.20Ghz 800Mhz FSB&&1 GB PC3200 400Mhz DDR RAM (Dual Channel)&&Nvidia GeForce 6800GT 256MB 8X AGP&&SB Audigy MP3+&&Win XP Pro
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Jun 28
th
, 2004 at 6:52pm
Scottler
Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA
Gender:
Posts: 5989
A.net is known for their high quality shots. To sacrifice that just to make everyone able to submit pics would basically turn their servers into a file storage facility in under 20 seconds.
If you want to post pics of lesser quality, there are countless places to do so. But A.net has set a standard. Practice and achieve that standard and you'll soon be seen by everyone who frequents the site.
As always, don't lower the bar, jump higher.
Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&
www.google.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras ««
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.