Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
May 24, 1941 - The Mighty Hood Goes Down (Read 1527 times)
Reply #15 - May 24th, 2004 at 10:21pm

Felix/FFDS   Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 1000000627
*****
 
Quote:
Arrg......lucky hit by the Krauts.


Not a "lucky" hit - the German gunnery and optics was much better, and they were in the better tactical position.

Quote:
Too bad their luck was short lived..............went down cuz of a torpedo from a obselete piece of British junk...........no offense to the brits Grin


While no one will doubt that the Stringbag was obsolete, it was not "junk".  It served its purpose and more, and actually outlived its replacement (Albacore).  If you want to compare "junk", I would say it was more effective than the American torpedo bomber of the same period - the Devastator.

Cheers
Jeff [/quote]
 

Felix/FFDS...
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - May 25th, 2004 at 4:24pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
The Stingbag was anything but junk. As Felix say'd it outlived the aircraft intended to replace it. It was also one of the most rugged and versitile carrier bourne aircraft out there. In Charles Lamb's autobiography there is a story of how a Swordfish flew straight into a barrage balloon cable, swung round a full 180 degrees and just kept on flying in the other direction. And this was with one wing nearly entirely sawn off.
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - May 25th, 2004 at 5:24pm

Stratobat   Offline
Colonel
To fly... Or not to fly?

Posts: 1165
*****
 
There was a documentary about the Hood and Bismarck released by National Geographic. Well worth it, I was lucky enough to catch it on TV a few years back, if you guys ever get the chance, watch it Smiley

Regards,
Stratobat

Edit: I sometimes wonder if the Bismarck was scuttled!
 

...&&&&'If the literal sense makes good sense, seek no other sense lest you come up with nonsense'
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - May 25th, 2004 at 5:32pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
I don't think its been proved that Dorsetshire actually delivered the knockout blow to Bismarck with torpedo's. Certainly i've heard accounts that Bismarck was scuttled at the last minute. However, I believe that she was sunk by Dorsetshire as she rolled over when sinking.
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - May 25th, 2004 at 8:35pm

Felix/FFDS   Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 1000000627
*****
 
Quote:
I don't think its been proved that Dorsetshire actually delivered the knockout blow to Bismarck with torpedo's. Certainly i've heard accounts that Bismarck was scuttled at the last minute. However, I believe that she was sunk by Dorsetshire as she rolled over when sinking.


In the final analysis, does it matter whether the Bismarck's immediate sinking was due to it being scuttled or whether it had had "death blows" dealt by the British?  If it hadn't been scuttled, it simply would have struggled a bit more before being sunk by more shellling or torpedos.
 

Felix/FFDS...
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print