Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
How to perform a climb out (Read 492 times)
Reply #15 - Apr 14th, 2004 at 5:24pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
i believe thats correct:) i couldnt find anything to contradict it. Boeings site basically calls the MD11's tail a revolutionary design to decrease drag and improve fuel economy Roll Eyes
anything i have put thats incorrect, please feel free to correct.Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Apr 14th, 2004 at 5:42pm

Selbio   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Gender: male
Posts: 503
*****
 
So was the MD-11 ever able to reach a range of 7240nm like it says on airliners.net?
 

Best Regards,&&Selby&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Apr 14th, 2004 at 8:18pm

Nexus   Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...

Gender: male
Posts: 3282
*****
 
Quote:
i believe thats correct:) i couldnt find anything to contradict it. Boeings site basically calls the MD11's tail a revolutionary design to decrease drag and improve fuel economy Roll Eyes
anything i have put thats incorrect, please feel free to correct.Smiley


I will make a brave try  Grin

The DC-10 is shorter than the MD-11, correct?
That would put the CoG closer (more aft) to the no2 engine and the horizontal stabilizers. Smiley
Now this of course doesn't mean the aircraft flies like a drunk pig, but in theory, that would make the aircraft sensitive to stabilizer pitch? Is the reason why the DC-10 had such a bad rep in the early stages? Because I believe Douglas came up with something to counteract with the sensitivity...
???
And this I know for a fact (the rest is just ramblings Grin )
The s-duct on the TriStar allows for a lower CoG, so the wing engines could be mounted farther away from the fuselage. hence  turbulent air from the fuselage will pass by the engine inlets instead of going thru them.

And I have always been taught that longer fuselages needs SMALLER rudder surfaces, so the DC-10 would actually require a larger rudder to counter with the yawing  ???

Anyway...this is fastly becoming an off topic subject Smiley

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Apr 14th, 2004 at 10:21pm

Selbio   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Gender: male
Posts: 503
*****
 
Anyways,

Back to the subject. I have been praticing the climb out with the MD 11 and I got much better. It looks more real now, before I asked about V2 and that kind of stuff, the plane was just gaining altitude and speed unrealistically fast. Now I seem to have more control over the slow moving aircraft.
 

Best Regards,&&Selby&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Apr 15th, 2004 at 5:40pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
i know that there were a number of changes made to the control surfaces from the DC10-10 to the DC10-40(or 20 in reality)  however the dc10 had many advantages over the Tristar, range being the major one, eastern airlines were forced to buy some dc10's because their L1011's couldnt make the miami london routes. in the end the most sucessful version of the DC10 was the DC10-30ER models it had exceptional range, performance and capacity, when some companies gave it a glass cockpit, it made it even better. The design of the number 2 engine is quite clever if you look at it, its actually angled downwards slightly, which was done to help with the problem of the COG. As for the rudder, just look at it:) its tiny, if there is a weakness in the design of the plane this is it, while it doesnt cause a huge problem, its still a little worrying.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print