Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
King Louis (Read 1872 times)
Mar 29th, 2004 at 7:03pm

Smoke2much   Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,

Posts: 3879
*****
 
I found out something quite interesting today.  Apparently we had a King Louis around 1280 something .  He was never crowned but was recognised by the Barons as King.  He was summarily evicted by King John and the pope after about 11 months.

Funny old world.
 

Who switched the lights off?  I can't see a thing.......  Hold on, my eyes were closed.  Oops, my bad...............&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Mar 30th, 2004 at 6:48am

Felix/FFDS   Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 1000000627
*****
 
Who's "we"  ??
 

Felix/FFDS...
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Mar 30th, 2004 at 7:37am

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
The royal "we". The inhabitants of England. Wink
Not Scotland though, by that time they had their own monarch. Smiley
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Mar 30th, 2004 at 10:09am

Felix/FFDS   Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 1000000627
*****
 
Quote:
The royal "we". The inhabitants of England. Wink
Not Scotland though, by that time they had their own monarch. Smiley


I thought so, but it's always nice to remember that not all folk trace our roots to England...Smiley

THen again, there was George I, Louis of Hanover...
 

Felix/FFDS...
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Mar 30th, 2004 at 8:13pm

Smoke2much   Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,

Posts: 3879
*****
 
I didn't forget that Felix, if I had been referring to any country but my own I would have written "The (insert country)".  To me writing "The English" would have felt odd and I thought most folks around here know where I'm from.  Funny old world but there you have it.  It's true about the Louis by the way.

Will
 

Who switched the lights off?  I can't see a thing.......  Hold on, my eyes were closed.  Oops, my bad...............&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Mar 31st, 2004 at 9:32am

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
I think the reason we've never heard of this King Louis before is because King John was still alive when he was proclaimed king by the barons, he was never crowned and within a year King John had got the throne back. And as there can't be two kings in one country, and as King John came out on top, Louis I was simply forgotten about.
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Mar 31st, 2004 at 9:46am

Smoke2much   Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,

Posts: 3879
*****
 
Plus the fact he was slightly French, we happened to be at war with them at the time.  It seems it was another invasion LOL.
 

Who switched the lights off?  I can't see a thing.......  Hold on, my eyes were closed.  Oops, my bad...............&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Mar 31st, 2004 at 3:12pm

Felix/FFDS   Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL

Gender: male
Posts: 1000000627
*****
 
Quote:
Plus the fact he was slightly French, we happened to be at war with them at the time.  It seems it was another invasion LOL.


Well, let's consider - Richard  (Coeur de Leon) - in his ten year reign of England, spent the grand total of six months(?) in England.  The rest of his reign was spent either sightseeing in Palestine, captured in Germany (two years), and fighting the French in HIS domains in Acquitaine (i.e. France).  For an English king, he was quite French.

 

Felix/FFDS...
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Mar 31st, 2004 at 3:45pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
Plus the fact he was slightly French, we happened to be at war with them at the time.  It seems it was another invasion LOL.

I wouldn't quite call it an invasion. The word invasion would lead me to suggest that he uninvitedly came to england and took the throne. As he was invited by the Barons I don't think it quite fits the word invasion... Smiley
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Apr 1st, 2004 at 6:37am

Smoke2much   Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,

Posts: 3879
*****
 
Yeah, Felix has it sussed.  It wasn't until Richard II that England really became "Real"  We had a brief turn at running the place until James I (VI Scotland) took over, then after the Scots we had the House of Orange (Dutch) then the House of Hanover (German) and finally the Sax Coburgs (German again) although they did change their name to Windsor to prevent being lynched.

Who am I kidding here.... LMAO
 

Who switched the lights off?  I can't see a thing.......  Hold on, my eyes were closed.  Oops, my bad...............&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Apr 1st, 2004 at 11:04am

eno   Offline
Colonel
Why you shouldn't light
your farts!!
Derbyshire UK

Posts: 7802
*****
 
I would like to point out at this point that England still does not have its own monach.
The correct title for the Queen is "Queen Elizbeth Queen of Scots and the second of England". A fact that the Scots forget is that James VI (first of England) did, infact,  move his court from Edinburgh to London. Had he not then Edinburgh would have become the Capital City of a United Kingdom.

Tis amazing what you learn when you live with a historian for 6 years  Wink Roll Eyes
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Apr 1st, 2004 at 11:15am

Smoke2much   Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,

Posts: 3879
*****
 
The English version would be Queen Elizabeth II, I of Scotland.  Under the Act of Union (17--??) I believe the English throne holds precedence over the Scots.

Geeze this could easily turn into a flaming session between the English members and the Scotish members. Smiley

Will
 

Who switched the lights off?  I can't see a thing.......  Hold on, my eyes were closed.  Oops, my bad...............&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Apr 1st, 2004 at 11:53am

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Aye. But if we're lucky they might not spot it. Grin

I doubt it will turn bad. Crazycraig hates the monarchy, so I doubt he cares, Whitey doesn't venture onto the boards often these days and I've forgotten who our other scottish members are... Smiley
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Apr 1st, 2004 at 12:30pm

eno   Offline
Colonel
Why you shouldn't light
your farts!!
Derbyshire UK

Posts: 7802
*****
 
Quote:
The English version would be Queen Elizabeth II, I of Scotland.  Under the Act of Union (17--??) I believe the English throne holds precedence over the Scots.

Geeze this could easily turn into a flaming session between the English members and the Scotish members. Smiley

Will


I hope it doesnt become flamable .... I'm English but I made my home in Scotland for 13 years (It's still my spiritual home)
I was of the understanding that when James ceeded (i think thats the right spelling Roll Eyes and the right word. ) the throne  he was still in Edinburgh he could have chosen to stay there .... however the most influencial people of the time where based in London .... and therefore James moved the Scottish court. He did have the power to bring the English court up to Edinburgh.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
 

...
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Apr 1st, 2004 at 12:35pm

Smoke2much   Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,

Posts: 3879
*****
 
As far as I'm aware you are spot on with the James and the Giant Capital bit.  I am no expert on this however so we may be agreeing in ignorance LOL.

My point was that the Queen is Queen first of England, then of Scotland as the precedent was set in the act of union some 100 odd years after the death of James.

Added to this is the fact that many Scots don't accept the Sovereignty of the English monarchy.  The whole debate is (IMHO) moot.

Will
 

Who switched the lights off?  I can't see a thing.......  Hold on, my eyes were closed.  Oops, my bad...............&&...
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print