Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Frame Rates (Read 800 times)
Reply #15 - Feb 17th, 2004 at 11:04am

bm_727   Offline
Colonel
Connecticut, USA!

Gender: male
Posts: 436
*****
 
Hey no problem congo, i dont mind- after all, this is all about fram rates  Tongue
 

...&&[glow=green,2,300]I didn't lose my mind- I sold it on Ebay! [/glow]
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Feb 17th, 2004 at 11:16am

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
Actually, those are my screenshot settings.

For normal flying, I use either 1024x768x32 with Antialiasing ON, or 1152x864x32 with Antialiasing OFF, this usually gets me around 25 FPS in dense scenery.

If the weather is thick with cloud, I have to get rid of the Antialiasing or FPS goes down the drain. That's when I switch to 1152x964.

If the weather is fine with a few clouds, 1024x768 with antialiasing on gives me 25 FPS, looks fine to me, and is good enough for screenshots really.

I mainly use the above mentioned mode (in my reply above- 1152x864x32 Antialiasing On) when I want a really nice screenshot.

It's a bit of a pain having to switch resolutions depending on the scenario, but good graphics card here in Australia is over $800, so I'll put up with it 'til prices drop.   Smiley

I've tried a lot of promising tweaks, but for one reason or another, I haven't had a lot of success without losing graphic quality in fs9.

I did replace my water textures, I cant remember where I got them. They are a re-edit of Bill Lyons and friends excellent water replacement textures. Re-edited by spitroast and Lemoncat.

I tried the FPS fix for clouds, ie. new cloud textures, it worked great, but..... the quality went down too far for my liking, many wouldn't notice though.

I tried the AUTOGEN fix, where you basically delete the contents of the autogen folder, thus removing all the restaurants and signs for the shops etc. This didn't have any measurable impact at any level that I could see on my rig.

Game settings do have a major impact:

Draw distances, Autogen density, cloud density/detail, screen resolution and effects seem to have FPS impacts I can control and balance, while maintaining Maximum terrain detail, texturing and aircraft rendering.

hope that helped
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Feb 17th, 2004 at 3:37pm

Black_Thunder   Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 6
*****
 
Yeah i agree. why does the graka's have to be so expensive Angry. If I could pay it I also bought a new graka  Roll Eyesbut until that I hang on with minimum FPS Embarrassed
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Feb 18th, 2004 at 2:44pm

4_Series_Scania   Offline
Colonel
He who laughs last, thinks
slowest.
Stoke on Trent England U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 3638
*****
 
Quote:
PIV 2.66Ghz @533Mhz FSB---768Mb PC2700 RAM---Seagate 120GB--- GeForce 4 Ti4200 8XAGP--- All other hardware isn't important for this problem.

Hope you can answer this question


You don't say if your using '98 or XP, if your running '98 reducing your RAM to 512 will give more performance! - '98 was'nt designed to handle more than 512MB, hence problems if you have over 512MB. Hope this helps.

Paul.
 

Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print