Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
History
› The automatic 'machine guns' - WWII
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages: 1
The automatic 'machine guns' - WWII (Read 1490 times)
Jan 31
st
, 2004 at 3:00am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
yes I'm still around. been in and out of hospital though> ozzy knows the story surrounding my last two weeks absence, so because my whole body is so sore including arms and hands I'll leave it to him to explain [if there's any explanation needed.........lol
;] excuse typing my hands are hurting badly - no caps and no punctuation - soory
ill make it a short one because i'm almost collapsing as i type this
i saw another of my history channel docos. one about the development of the 'trench guns' as they were caled.
1st they wen thru the german mg models and then the us 'grease gun', then the sten and the good ol aussie 'owen gun' mwhich could fire underneath muddy water!
has anyone seen this doco. comments re development of auto weapons during the war - aslo referenc to the larger machine guns of wwi.
«
Last Edit: Feb 4
th
, 2004 at 2:50am by Professor Brensec
»
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jan 31
st
, 2004 at 7:07am
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Good to see you around Prof, this place is not quite the same without you pal
Hope you get well soon.
I've not seen this show, but I remember seeing a show called the story of the gun on History that had an episode about Machine guns. Can't remember too much about it now, but the one thing I did find out was that B.A.R. (as in the WW2 US infantry machine gun) stands for Browning Automatic Rifle. I didn't know that
Sad but true!
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jan 31
st
, 2004 at 9:30am
Flying Trucker
Ex Member
Good to see you back Professor
Sorry did not catch that series....."trench guns"
Get well soon
Cheers....Happy Landings....Doug
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jan 31
st
, 2004 at 10:07am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Hi Brensec. Hope you recover soon.
The only machine gun I know anything about is the good old BREN gun. I could strip one down & reassemble it blindfold at one time athough I can't say I actually fired one.
Quote:
The BREN gun was chosen in 1938 by a War Office Committee as the successor to the Lewis gun. One of the designs put forward to the committee was the Czech zb/26, a gas operated, magazine fed, air cooled LMG. The Czech town of Bruno, home of the zb/26 lent its name to the BREN (Bruno Enfield). It seemed ideal for use by the British Army and so was accepted. The only modification required was the re barrelling and the curved magazine required to allow it to fire the rimmed 0.303 SAA ball round rather than the 7.92mm Mauser. Some have even said that the hardest adaptation required for the BREN to go into service was the conversion of the plans from metric to imperial.
The soldiers of the British Army found the BREN to be a reasonably light, reliable and accurate weapon that was easy to maintain and had a good rate of fire. The only real problem was the magazine. The zb/26 had been designed to take the rimless 7.92 mauser round, when the 0.303 round was used, the magazine had to be loaded with the rims one in front of the other to prevent stoppages. The problem with this was if the Magazine was loaded in a hurry a round might be loaded incorrectly resulting in a stoppage. On the other hand, fixing a stoppage on the BREN was relatively simple:
1. Remove Magazine
2. Smack the magazine on a solid surface, HARD!!!
The BREN saw service in the British Army in 5 varieties:
MK1 and MK1*M, a Canadian version, the only difference between this and the MK1 was the butt shape (both of these weapons were in service by 1939)
MK2 which was used from 1943 onwards
MK3, a lightened version for use by airborne troops, used from 1944
MK4 used from very late 1944 and after the war it was re named the LMG and was still in service in the 1970's
http://www.wwiitech.net/main/britain/weapons/bren/
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jan 31
st
, 2004 at 11:22am
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
The Bren gun is the best LMG ever made. And I think this is proved by the fact that converted to 7.62 it is still in use today.
The US Grease gun is what the yanks made after we let them have a gander at the Sten. In my opinion its a horrible weapon. Why use one when you make Tommy guns?
As for heavy machine guns, I think the prize must go to the Lewis gun. That thing could fire continuosly for 72 hours and far better than the Maxims it was based on and facing.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jan 31
st
, 2004 at 12:23pm
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
Quote:
The US Grease gun is what the yanks made after we let them have a gander at the Sten. In my opinion its a horrible weapon. Why use one when you make Tommy guns?
For the same reason the Sten gun was made. The Thompson was heavy, and made out of machined parts. The Sten/grease guns were mostly stampings.
Quote:
As for heavy machine guns, I think the prize must go to the Lewis gun. That thing could fire continuosly for 72 hours and far better than the Maxims it was based on and facing.
I always thought of the Lewis gun as a "light" machine gun, vs the heavier Maxim and Vickers guns. Perhaps you meant to say the "Vickers" guns?
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jan 31
st
, 2004 at 4:27pm
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
Quote:
I always thought of the Lewis gun as a "light" machine gun, vs the heavier Maxim and Vickers guns. Perhaps you meant to say the "Vickers" guns?
I did mean to say Vickers. It seems all my life i've been confusing the Vickers with the Lewis. I blame this on the similarity betweem the Lewis and the Vickers K.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Feb 1
st
, 2004 at 12:44am
SilverFox441
Offline
Colonel
Now What?
Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
Gender:
Posts: 1467
Having fired the Sten...I can fully attest to it's cheap construction.
Best LMG to my mind was/is the German MG42.
Just now being retired by the US military...of course the "redesign" is called the M-60 in US service.
Steve
(Silver Fox)
Daly
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Feb 1
st
, 2004 at 2:00am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Thanks for the 'get wells' people.
Makes me feel all warm and fuzzy.
Alot better today actually. Thanks.
The apparent problem (and only problem) with the Thompson, which had been made pretty much in it's original form since, I think 1921, was it was so expensive. The grease guns could be made for a literal 'fraction' of the cost. That's why you generally only see Lt, Cpt or higher with a Thompson during WWII.
They apparently were an extremely reliable gun until they got 'crap' in them, which is a silly design for war. But then they weren't really designed for that specific purpose, according to the Doco. 8)
One thing I wasn't aware of, that the doco opened my eyes to, is that the Thompson could be 'switched' to 'semi-auto' firing. This apparently made it a very good weapon, with the barrel being longer and better rifled than virtually all other 'machine gins'. It was basically a rifle then, except for the cartridge.
It was also handy that the Thompson and the standard side arm (Colt 45 Semi Auto) used exactly the same cartridge, too. I can't imagine getting hit at close range (20 metres or so) with about 6 or 8, 45 cals!!
Anyway, apparently the Thompson, was the first of it's kind, or at least the first to be adopted as a Military weapon. Don't recall which it was. maybe both.
I also didn't know that the mags came in 20, 30 and 50 rounds. The 50 being the 'round type', which was actually used during the war, although you don't see them in the war movies, or in WWII footage, either.
Very interesting.
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Feb 1
st
, 2004 at 2:26am
BFMF
Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest
Gender:
Posts: 19820
Hi Bren, good to see ya again
Quote:
I also didn't know that the mags came in 20, 30 and 50 rounds. The 50 being the 'round type', which was actually used during the war, although you don't see them in the war movies, or in WWII footage, either.
In the newest Pearl Harbour movie at one of the airport scenes where a bunch of people grabbed weapons and started shooting at the enemy aircraft, I believe Ben Aflek had a Tommy gun with one of those round magazines. I could be wrong though
Btw, what kind of machine gun did Tom Hanks use in the movie 'Road to Perdition'???
COMPLETED: If Anyone Cares, Here's A Map Of My Current FSX Flight Around The World
My Reality Check Bounced
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Feb 1
st
, 2004 at 4:53pm
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
The 50 and 100 round "Drum" magazines were probably a bit cumbersome in war time.
Quote:
Best LMG to my mind was/is the German MG42.
The only good thing there is about the Mg42 is that its light weight and has a high rate of fire (1200RPM). However, the ammunition only came in 50 round belts. Which meant reloading every 2.5 seconds. Then with such a high rate of fire you have a barrel thats going to over heat very rapidly so out of 1200 rounds only the first 200 or so are going to be of an use at all. I.e. going anywhere near the target. I would not rate the Mg42 as the best there is/was.
Whats more the M60 is not a modification of the Mg42. The M60 only uses the same feed mechanism as the Mg42. If the M60 was a modification to the Mg42 then the M60 would have been a good weapon from its outset.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Feb 1
st
, 2004 at 5:39pm
Felix/FFDS
Offline
Admin
FINALLY an official Granddad!
Orlando, FL
Gender:
Posts: 1000000627
I don't know if it's still in use, but I believe that the MG42 was designated MG1 and used by the (modern) German Army in NATO 7.62mm, and probably other European NATO countries.
Felix/
FFDS
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Feb 4
th
, 2004 at 2:47am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
There's a site called "Encyclopaedia Brittanica - Normandy". A great site that, among many other aspects of the D-Day campaign, covers a few facts and figures about the campaign itself and also figures etc for the entire war.
I love the live news reporter (even the yank accent) when your log in. Hit this and have your sound on:
http://search.eb.com/normandy/
One I recall is the number of .50 calibre heavy MG's ordered (or delivered) to the US Army from 1942 to 1945. It was in the order of 685,000.
Of course, this obviously includes all those fighters and bombers that had 6, 8 or 10 each, but still alot of Heavy MG's, in any event.
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Feb 22
nd
, 2004 at 5:01am
Silent Exploder
Ex Member
Quote:
T
I would not rate the Mg42 as the best there is/was.
I would. I've talked to a German Machine Gunner who fought in Italy and Russia. He said that the MG 42 was a great iweapon compared to the earlier MG34. You could fill in a ton of sand and that thing would still shoot. As for the ammunition belts,I'll ask him,when I see him the next time.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Feb 22
nd
, 2004 at 9:54am
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
Quote:
I would. I've talked to a German Machine Gunner who fought in Italy and Russia. He said that the MG 42 was a great iweapon compared to the earlier MG34. You could fill in a ton of sand and that thing would still shoot. As for the ammunition belts,I'll ask him,when I see him the next time.
I'm not saying that it isn't a great weapon. It must have been and as Felix says it's still in use in some armies. All i'm saying is that it wasn't the best there ever was. 1200rpm isn't really that useful and the most damage it did was to the moral of the allied troops.
I still consider the Bren to be the best LMG there was/is.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages: 1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History ««
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.