Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
The Unofficial FS9 Hardware Benchmark (Read 342 times)
Jan 23rd, 2004 at 2:11am

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
Ok, we all like to see how cool our PC's are compared to other's!

But, then there are all those variables that make the results all so undefinitive.

Well, I figured we all have the default flight, so here is how to do the benchmark.

Go to your display properties and set your graphics drivers for the best quality settings you can rig up on your drivers. I just put all my sliders up to max with 4x antialising, all quality mipmapping settings etc. These settings are going to vary on different PC's and driver versions, but hey! It's the best we can do!

Start FS9, go to settings/display and slide every option, in every category, to max, click all the boxes etc. MAX IT OUT ! ! !   Grin 
(Make sure you unlock your frame rate limit to infinity!)

Now, some PC's won't accept all these tweaks and it will automatically drop back to whatever your card will handle, but hey! Who cares!

Now go to SELECT FLIGHT / OTHERS / DEFAULT FLIGHT (Change nothing)

Press Fly, now leave the brake on, don't move.

Press SHIFT + Z once or twice until you see this screen.

That's your benchmark!

Try to get a stable shot representitive of the average FPS. (or a bit higher! but please don't post in a freak glitch reading)

...

Oops! I don't think those are the default runway textures!   Shocked
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jan 23rd, 2004 at 5:43am
Silent Exploder   Ex Member

 
21FPS?? Shocked Shocked Shocked

buggar!  Cry Roll Eyes Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jan 23rd, 2004 at 1:09pm

JBaymore   Offline
Global Moderator
Under the curse of the
hombuilt cockpit!

Gender: male
Posts: 10261
*****
 
congo,

I applauud you effort..... however you might remember I was trying to do this sort of thing a while back....and got too few "takers" out of the massive membership of this board.  The "standardization" idea is a good start.

But there are too many variables that have to be controlled to do this casually and have it at all meaningful.

Screen resolution.  Color bit depth.  Txtures in use.  Level of AI traffic.  Stock or custom AI traffic.  How many AI are in a vacintitiy at the time.  Are the AI planes stock or others.  How frame rate freindly are eht AI pplanes in use.

This could go on a while.

I too want some sort of definitive benchmar studies to help make sense of the hardware requirements for FS2004.  At the moment they seem to be somewhat illogical. 

I am sort of leaning to frontside buss speed and main RAM speed as being at least as important as the video card when you try to max ALL the sliders and chack all the boxes.  But there are apparent exceptions to THAT also.

So good luck........ I will watch this thread.

best,

...............john
 

... ...Intel i7 960 quad 3.2G LGA 1366, Asus P6X58D Premium, 750W Corsair, 6 gig 1600 DDR3, Spinpoint 1TB 7200 HD, Caviar 500G 7200 HD, GTX275 1280M,  Logitec Z640, Win7 Pro 64b, CH Products yoke, pedals + throttle quad, simpit
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jan 23rd, 2004 at 10:07pm

congo   Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 3663
*****
 
It's only meant to be fun.  Grin

And 21fps is a bit icky isn't it?  Tongue

Believe it or not, I really tweaked hard to achieve that score on my GF4 TI4200 video card!

That's right JBaymore, there are too many variables, notice I didn't even specify a resolution!

It's just interesting to see what you get, that's all.

I use all quality driver settings with antialiasing locked at 4x always. I find that to get decent graphics in FS9  on my rig, I have to turn down the mipmap level to 4, Hardware lights down to 6, Ground scenery shadows off, autogen down to dense, Global textures to high.

I can leave everything else up, fortunately.

If I need a higher framerate, (dense scenery areas) I drop the resolution from my normal 1152x864x32 down to 1024x768x32. That usually produces quite decent Frame rates.  I aim for between 25 and 35fps while simming in fs9.
 

...Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print