what about Gabriel Princip (im not sure if thats his first name) but because of his ideological ideas he was the spark responsible for the first world war, and that was cleaned up in a messy way. Because of this he could have been liable to blame for the second as well. simply because he put two bullets into Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria Hungry.!
but since it is out of hitler and stalin, i would say that they are both as bad as eachother.
on one hand hitler wa a cleaver man but sometimes he lied through his teah. an example of this is when he marched right into the rhineland with troops. this was a de-militerized zone after WW1 and he was completely defying the Treaty of Versailles. To be honest, UK and US should have put a firmer foot down. He was lucky though as there was an attempt to kill him by one of his generals. cant remember the name but he only had 1 eye!
on the other hand is stalin. He did for a long time negotiate with the uk and us and italy during the conferences of potsdam and the like. but he was more of an eil man than hitler. he grew up knowing only of power. he thought himself as dictator and king of the world in his opinion. infuriating him over the change of currency in germany after it was in control of the allies was a bad idea on the UK and USA front.


That was a little bit of my GCSE history for you. ive got my exam in about 7 weeks so wish me good luck. 


i really think stalin was worse as he was plain evil whereas hitler did what he did because he wanted a better world for germany.

thanks

ant 8)

thats the 1., i wathced something on discovery about it!