Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
flight school aircraft (Read 1021 times)
Jan 20th, 2004 at 4:57pm

VanMan   Offline
Lieutenant Colonel

Posts: 6
*****
 
Hello all,

This is my first post as a new member of simviation Grin

After being a flight simmer of very limited skill since fs98, I have decided to delve into the real world of aviation and have 2 flight schools near me in the Vancouver BC area. Both have good credentials and price is relatively the same. My question is, one school uses a Piper Cherokee PA-28-140 and the other a Cessna 172. Is one aircraft better to learn on than the other? I know a couple of people that have advised me using the Cessna since it can be found at just about any airpark thus being more accessible if I'm on vacation and would like to rent one. I would like to have the opinion of all you real-life pilots out there. Please state your pro's and cons of each aircraft so I can make a more educated decision.

Thanks all.
Happy flying  Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jan 21st, 2004 at 12:35am

Meinas   Ex Member
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

*****
 
CESSNA you want..... from my experience the Cherokee has a terrible brake system (the ones I flew back in the day), they didnt have toe brakes, but a single handle below the dash, I had to lean forward towards the panel, severely restricting my view of the outside world.

The Cessna's high wing also gives better visibility when you start doing practicing some emergency maneuvers.

and the Cessna seems to be A LOT more popular than the Cherokee, so most likely where ever you move to in the future you'll have a fairly familiar aircraft to fly.

edit: I think the cherokee is the equivilent of the Cessna 152, and the Piper Warrior is the equivilent of the Cessna 172, at least in my opinion Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jan 21st, 2004 at 1:07am

RitterKreuz   Offline
Colonel
Texas

Gender: male
Posts: 1253
*****
 
My school has operated a Cessna 172 for the past 2 years which i have instructed in for nearly 1,000 hours. I was always a fan of the cessna line, and i still am.

We recently "retired" our worn out 172N and management replaced it with a Piper Warrior II. The piper handles great, i have found through my own trial and error and through providing instruction in the machine that the stalling characteristics are quite a bit more forgiving than the Cessna 172. Especially the power on stall, which most students tend to dread. While the 172 would leave you hanging by the prop at a rediculously nose high attitude before it finally brakes over, the Piper will simply buffet and provide a warning horn and any brake over at all will be to the horizon and no deeper. The stabilator of the piper provides, at least in my opinion, much more of a feeling of a "larger aircraft" but is a bit more sensative in pitch than the 172 which uses an elevator.

We have not run across any brake problems yet. Our Piper is equipped with dual toe brakes and a hand parking brake, however some particularly older models incorperate a rather dreadful hand brake as the only means of stopping the aircraft. (few flight schools out there operate pipers without dual brakes these days)

The low wing Piper may obstruct visibility straight down on either side of the aircraft, however the it has a more panoramic view and a roomier feel than the boxy 172 provides.

My recommendation to you is to approach both flight schools and take an introductory flight in both aircraft. Have the Instructor demonstrate as much to you as he is willing to demonstrate in each aircraft, fly each aircraft as much hands on as you can during the intro ride. Then base your decision on whatever aircraft you enjoy flying the best.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jan 21st, 2004 at 11:34am

VanMan   Offline
Lieutenant Colonel

Posts: 6
*****
 
Thanks for responding Meinas and RitterKruez. I'll take your advise RitterKruez and take the introductory flight in both aircraft. Each seem to have pro's and cons from what you've both responded so I guess whichever aircraft "feels" more comfortable will be the winner.

Thanks again
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jan 21st, 2004 at 1:28pm

Redwing   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 133
*****
 
I've logged a number of hours in the Cherokee and at least several hundred in the ubiquitous 172.....have also seen these debates before about high-wing versus low-wing aircraft; always comes down to personal preference!

I'd agree with RitterKruez about giving both aircraft a try, although personally, I would recommend the hi-wing Cessnas for your initial flight training. As a student pilot, you'll be doing  some ground-reference maneuvers that favor the better view below. Also on your cross-country flights (a requirement for the PPL), optimum ground visibility is a plus for picking up surface checkpoints and other map references. Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jan 21st, 2004 at 2:57pm

Mr. Bones   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 4304
*****
 
people tell me (and trust me, they can know it) that a Cessna isn't a good aircraft for training, especially not a 172! most of them say: get your license on a Cessna, afterwards you can start learning to fly! what i (they) want to say is that even a baby can fly and land a Skyhawk. personally i've never flown one so i can't tell.  Wink
 

Raw power...the J-58.&&...&&&&My Anet collection.&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jan 21st, 2004 at 11:17pm

Redwing   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 133
*****
 
Quote:
personally i've never flown one so i can't tell.


Never worry about that; you're as qualified as about 99% of the rest of the people on these forums! Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Jan 22nd, 2004 at 2:21am

BFMF   Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender: male
Posts: 19820
*****
 
Quote:
people tell me (and trust me, they can know it) that a Cessna isn't a good aircraft for training, especially not a 172!


Hmm, then why are Cessnas so popular as trainers ??? Wink

There must be a few good reasons Grin
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Jan 22nd, 2004 at 4:00am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
Hmm, then why are Cessnas so popular as trainers ??? Wink

There must be a few good reasons Grin

I think it's basically because they are easy to fly. This is not the same as being an ideal trainer. The best trainers have no serious vices but are difficult to fly well. There is a difference. Wink

PS. I can remember when light aircraft like the Cessnas with tricycle gear & a yoke were first introduced. The advertising slogan went something like "So easy to land - Just drive it onto the ground". I also remember our chief flying instructor's comments. LOL
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Jan 22nd, 2004 at 5:50am

Mr. Bones   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 4304
*****
 
yes Hagar, they are popular because they are easy to fly...but do you really want the easy stuff?  Wink
 

Raw power...the J-58.&&...&&&&My Anet collection.&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Jan 22nd, 2004 at 6:54am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
yes Hagar, they are popular because they are easy to fly...but do you really want the easy stuff?  Wink

Well, as they're so popular maybe I'm wrong.
I've never flown one myself but this the way I look at it. A Cessna makes an ideal trainer if all you ever want to fly is a Cessna. Roll Eyes

I was taught on the Tiger Moth which is regarded as one of the finest basic trainers ever built. They used to say that if you can fly a Tiger well you can fly almost anything. I still believe that to be true. Wink
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Jan 22nd, 2004 at 11:50am

C   Offline
Colonel
Earth

Posts: 13144
*****
 
Personally, I prefer low wing aeroplanes for the visibility they offer in flight. It's nice to be able to have a nice view of the ground in an emergency, but I prefer to have a better view of whats going on around me in the sky, as (hopefully) that's more useful, especially while manouvring...

Charlie
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Jan 22nd, 2004 at 12:01pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
i love the piper warrior, it feels spacious, and it feels like your really flying it.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Jan 22nd, 2004 at 1:39pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
Personally, I prefer low wing aeroplanes for the visibility they offer in flight. It's nice to be able to have a nice view of the ground in an emergency, but I prefer to have a better view of whats going on around me in the sky, as (hopefully) that's more useful, especially while manouvring...

Charlie

The only high-wing aircraft I can remember flying was a Beagle Terrier (fomerly Auster A.O.P 6). I didn't particularly like it. The DHC-1 Chipmunk is basically a low-wing Tiger Moth & was the ideal trainer. IMHO

I might have a go in a Beagle/SA Bulldog later this year. The Bulldog was designed & first built at Shoreham. It always had a good reputation & is also fully aerobatic. I don't like being the right way up for too long. Cheesy
I'll tell you what I think of it. Wink

PS. I always fancied a go in a Piper Cub. A friend owns one & I've been promised a flight in it. I must remind him when the weather improves. Smiley
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Jan 22nd, 2004 at 7:44pm

Citationpilot   Offline
Colonel

Posts: 114
*****
 
The two aren't comparable, both are totally different airplanes that you'll eventually want to be checked out in either way. Make your desicion based on which flight school is better and cheaper.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print