Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Real World
›
Real Aviation
› Cross your legs folks
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
Cross your legs folks (Read 943 times)
Jan 8
th
, 2004 at 8:08am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
I agree there have to be some sort of security measures in the current climate but isn't this taking things just a little too far?
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/01/06/1073268035697.html
It seems this plan will be extended to all countries. I fail to see how it could be enforced. ???
What with this & the new visa regulations just announced - I, for one, will be taking my holidays in Europe for the foreseeable future. I don't think I will be the only one.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3378057.stm
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jan 8
th
, 2004 at 8:21am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
been listening to these on the radio all morning. its pathetic. This is in no way meant as an offensive comment to the US as i love the place, but the government and their security have completely crossed the line and have lost it. BA have already said they wont be enforcing the toilet rule. As for passports requiring fingerprints, this is what we get for supporting the US last year.
I am now seriously reconsidering going to college there, and no doubt visitor numbers to the US are going to drop big time.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jan 8
th
, 2004 at 11:13am
Smoke2much
Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,
Posts: 3879
Well I won't be going
I have never been finger printed and I don't plan to start now. If getting a British passport requires fingerprints in the future they can stuff that as well. This is simply a governmental attempt to get data on everybody, supposedly for our safety. Big brother is watching.....
Will
Who switched the lights off? I can't see a thing....... Hold on, my eyes were closed. Oops, my bad...............&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jan 14
th
, 2004 at 10:43am
Jared
Offline
Colonel
I'd rather be flying...
Uniontown, Ohio
Gender:
Posts: 12621
You can only do so much prevention, the rest is take it as it comes...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jan 14
th
, 2004 at 10:53am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
visas will soon be needed to by the way, everyone needing one will have to travel to the US embassy in London, oh and incase you were wondering it shuts at 11am. Nice for those people in Scotland and the far west.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jan 14
th
, 2004 at 1:20pm
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
I feel that this is sadly paranoia and isolationism at its worst. America will come through I'm sure, but I think sadly it will suffer first, as this will all but destroy international tourism to the USA, and America will feel the hit to the economy from lost revenue and jobs
. However at least all our Americans chums here know the score, and hey they can come to Europe without this silliness and have great holidays
Visit places that are older than their country in modern historical terms
If anyone fancies visiting Hungary this year then do so before the end of July, as at the beginning of August I should be a father and will be unavailable for vineyard tours etc
If you should turn up in August however, well there'll be a chance for you to earn some dough babysitting
Ozzy
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 4:44am
flyingfez
Offline
Colonel
when in doubt use the
cat and duck method of
IFR
United States
Gender:
Posts: 11
I just thought I pipe in from the US.
I agree this is utterly ridiculous.
What passenger compliment is actually going to let a hijacker take over a plane after 9/11. Atta and his buddies queered the whole deal for all hijackers. The old line dont move and we won't hurt anyone just isn't going to fly anymore. (pun not intended)
Also I just thought I'd try to get an international perspective on this.
What do you guys think about the Airline pilots in the United States having sidearms in the cockpit
This space intentionally left blank
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 5:27am
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
Tough call flyingfez with regard to the firearms on planes issue. Personally I think its more of a hazard, I mean actually having loaded weapons on board a plane is daft. It gives hijackers another way of getting armed on a flight
Also what happens if there is a negligent discharge or a weapons failure leading to a discharge of a round in a cockpit? Hello mother Earth, can we be friends at 500 mph?
Speaking as a former serviceman (and therefore having some knowledge of security, especially on British bases) I feel that most European countries have the right idea that security should be on the ground, and thorough checks done there of both passengers and airport staff. If the proper measures are implimented then there should be minimal danger.
Maybe we should take a leaf out of the El Al (is this the correct spelling for the Israeli carrier?) book. They haven't had a hijack for I something like 30 plus years. Its sad, but alas necessary in these times.
Ozzy
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 11:41am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
Also I just thought I'd try to get an international perspective on this.
What do you guys think about the Airline pilots in the United States having sidearms in the cockpit
Thanks for your comments Flyingfez. I would have to agree with Ozzy on this one. It's a difficult decision & I feel the pilots & crew should have as much protection as possible. However, I've never believed there is a case for carrying any type of firearm on a civil aircraft.
Not being used to the concept of personal firearms it wouldn't make me feel any safer to know the captain is armed, in fact it would have the opposite effect. If this (or the "sky marshals") becomes standard procedure I would rather not fly at all. I still think the best way is to make sure nobody on board the aircraft is armed in the first place. This might be difficult if not impossible but it's the only acceptable option for me.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 11:48am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
some form of stun gun would work quite well,
That and a few pars of handcuffs. Knock em down, restrain them. just as likely to work as a gun without the danger of smashed windows at altitude. Plus better to have a potential hijacker alive than dead.
«
Last Edit: Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 2:56pm by Craig.
»
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 2:39pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
some form of stung gun would work quite well,Plus better to have a potential hijacker alive than dead.
Would that be a sting gun or a stun gun? How about a nest of trained wasps or even better, hornets?
Sorry to be flippant as this is a serious subject but it is my topic.
Quote:
That and a few pars of handcuffs
I hear that Tie Wraps make very efficient restraints. Lighter, easier to carry & more adaptable than handcuffs. This of course applies to anyone, not only the good guys.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 2:55pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
lol jumped the gun on spelling:)
stun gun was meant:)
plastic ties cuffs whatever works best
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 3:46pm
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
Plastic tie-wraps. Hmm kinky
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 4:50pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
Plastic tie-wraps. Hmm kinky
A very useful piece of kit. I don't know what they're made of but it certainly ain't plastic.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jan 20
th
, 2004 at 4:52pm
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
The are some kind of nylon derivative I believe. The police use them a lot now
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Jan 22
nd
, 2004 at 3:24am
flyingfez
Offline
Colonel
when in doubt use the
cat and duck method of
IFR
United States
Gender:
Posts: 11
I totally agree that all the air carriers in the US need to take lessons from El AL. However, one of my friends made a pilgrimage to Israel last year, and he said that on the El Al flight there was two armed, uniformed security personell on board sitting at the front of the plane. I also believe that Israel has an air marshall style program where there are plainclothes agents on the aircraft.
This space intentionally left blank
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Jan 22
nd
, 2004 at 3:27am
flyingfez
Offline
Colonel
when in doubt use the
cat and duck method of
IFR
United States
Gender:
Posts: 11
Also wouldn't advise Tasers or stun guns on an aircraft. I am a sheriffs deputy here in the states and Ive seen too many people fight through a hit with a taser. I myself have been hit with a stun gun and while I can say that it was very unpleasant (understatement of the decade) I wouldn't call it debilitating. With the modern advances in frangible ammunition I wouldn't be particularly concerned with discharging a firearm on board an airliner.
Btw: There are both plastic and nylon type of quick cuffs.
we use them quite a bit in situations with large numbers of suspects.
This space intentionally left blank
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation ««
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.