Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
General
›
General Discussion
› The most significant advance in flight?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
The most significant advance in flight? (Read 809 times)
Reply #30 -
Dec 18
th
, 2003 at 3:30am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
But I have to say that the "Flying tail" that was a direct result of the X-1 test program. Which allowed the sound barrier to be broken, and which from then on all jet fighter craft were incorperated with.
SabreHawk. You could easily have missed it with everything straying off-topic (my fault) but the all-flying tail was not a new idea. In fact it was a very old one.
Hagar said:
Quote:
Strange how the old ideas sometimes turn out best after all. I recall something about all-moving tailplanes & supersonic flight. The idea had been used back in the very early days & discarded in favour of elevators.
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/AVbleriot.htm
The X1 is generally agreed to have been partly based on the Miles M.52 which featured an all-flying tailplane.
http://www.aero51.plus.com/html/exhibits/m52.htm
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Dec 18
th
, 2003 at 9:47am
SabreHawk
Offline
Colonel
Off we go......
Seattle, Wa. USA
Gender:
Posts: 492
Yeah, .....heh, I geuss I can sometimes in my zeal to put in my 2 cents worth miss something said allready.
Thanks for the link, that's some interesting stuff on the M.52. It seems that like the Wright Bros. Bell, with the previous work of others was able to bring it to a reality, and then are able to take all the credit.
The Wright Bros, who's work was based on the works of Lientholl( I know, not spelled correctly) and Langley were able to bring it all together into a package that worked wind up getting all the credit for birthing flight itself.
But maybe that's just what it takes, the work of many, some even though they failed or were abandoned, and for others down the road to bring all of it together into what will work.
So it is, that many of our present day heros, got there standing on the shoulders of giants. 8)
&& [center]
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Dec 18
th
, 2003 at 9:56am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Strange to realise that the M.52 was supposedly cancelled because of its straight wings. Swept wings were currently in fashion due to German WWII research & considered by the "experts" the way to go about breaking that "sound barrier". Bell didn't seem too worried about that.
I find that there are not many original ideas. Most things have been done before but maybe not in the right way or before their time. Give credit to those who did achieve it. I'm not trying to take anything away from the Wright Brothers, Bell Aircraft or Chuck Yeager. This is the way progress is made.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Dec 18
th
, 2003 at 5:13pm
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
Quote:
Strange to realise that the M.52 was supposedly cancelled because of its straight wings. Swept wings were currently in fashion due to German WWII research & considered by the "experts" the way to go about breaking that "sound barrier". Bell didn't seem too worried about that.
I find that there are not many original ideas. Most things have been done before but maybe not in the right way or before their time. Give credit to those who did achieve it. I'm not trying to take anything away from the Wright Brothers, Bell Aircraft or Chuck Yeager. This is the way progress is made.
Funny that. I heard a theory that the M52 was cancelled for political reasons. Meaning the government decided to let the americans break the sound barrier.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Dec 18
th
, 2003 at 5:15pm
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
Oh yeah, the all moving tailplane on the X.1 was there because the elevators were causing problems at high speeds and the yanks had seen the M.52 and thought... "Ahhh!"
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Dec 18
th
, 2003 at 5:19pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
Funny that. I heard a theory that the M52 was cancelled for political reasons. Meaning the government decided to let the americans break the sound barrier.
I think the truth of the matter was defence cuts. Same old story. Read the article from my link. No use in crying over spilt milk. This all happened a long time ago.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Dec 18
th
, 2003 at 6:53pm
SabreHawk
Offline
Colonel
Off we go......
Seattle, Wa. USA
Gender:
Posts: 492
Yes that's right, they sent all the research info over to Bell. And Bell then took up the continuation of it. And subsequently succeeded with it in the X-1 program.
&& [center]
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Dec 19
th
, 2003 at 3:26am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
Yes that's right, they sent all the research info over to Bell.
Needless to say the guys at Miles Aircraft weren't too happy about that. It was supposed to be a reciprocal deal. As it was a government contract they were forced to send the data. As usual, they never got anything in return.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion ««
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.