Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
›
Hardware
› Athalon vs. Intel
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
4
Athalon vs. Intel (Read 2000 times)
Reply #15 -
Dec 18
th
, 2003 at 10:32am
Delta_
Offline
Colonel
Woah!
London, UK
Gender:
Posts: 2032
That is truly mad,
they are about £550 UK
My system:
Intel Q6600@3.6GHz, Corsair XMS2 4GB DDR2-6400 (4-4-4-12-1T) , Sapphire 7850 OC 2BG 920/5000, X-Fi Fatality, Corsair AX 750, 7 Pro x64
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Dec 19
th
, 2003 at 2:54pm
4_Series_Scania
Offline
Colonel
He who laughs last, thinks
slowest.
Stoke on Trent England U.K.
Gender:
Posts: 3638
I had an utterly naff 1.7 Celeron, it ran most things well except CFS3
I'd recomend a Celeron to somebody about as much as I'd recomend piles......
However, if your looking to build a machine and plan to upgrade in the relative future, then buy the best Springdale board you can afford (Which support the 400fsb Celeron's) then once the price drops as it surely will, replace the Celeron with an 800fsb p4 - and find out instantly why the p4's cost so very much more!
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Dec 20
th
, 2003 at 1:07pm
Ivan
Offline
Colonel
No, I'm NOT Russian, I
only like Russian aircraft
The netherlands
Gender:
Posts: 6058
Tech rant ahead...
Pentium is faster memory wise
AMD is faster in floating point
AMD Athlon is nearly the same as the famous DEC Alpha if you talk about bus protocol. There is a certain AMD-built server chipset that can be set to DEC Alpha mode, just by changing the processor socket (not a user mod)
Russian planes:
IL-76 (all standard length ones)
,
Tu-154 and Il-62
,
Tu-134
and
An-24RV
&&&&AI flightplans and repaints can be found
here
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Dec 21
st
, 2003 at 10:38am
Dan
Offline
Colonel
Meet Bogart! Thanks CRAIG!
Carmarthenshire, Wales, Uk!
Gender:
Posts: 2053
Quote:
Tech rant ahead...
Was that it? Was that the rant? I expected more than that...
Dan G
Wales, Uk
&&
3DMark01
||
OCUK - The best UK shop
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Dec 21
st
, 2003 at 6:08pm
4_Series_Scania
Offline
Colonel
He who laughs last, thinks
slowest.
Stoke on Trent England U.K.
Gender:
Posts: 3638
Quote:
Was that it? Was that the rant? I expected more than that...
Dan G
Wales, Uk
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Dec 29
th
, 2003 at 4:43am
richardd43
Offline
Colonel
Edmonton AB
Gender:
Posts: 764
Buy an AMD 2500+ Barton and set the FSB at 200. You effectively have a AMD 3200 for half the price
Asus P8Z77-V Deluxe
Intel I7 3770K w/ Corsair H100
Thermaltake Level 10 GT
Silverstone 1000W PSU
Corsair 120G Force 3
2 x Seagate Sata 3
16 G Corsair Meemory
2 x EVGA GTX 295
Windows 7 Ultimate
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Dec 29
th
, 2003 at 3:08pm
boo_a_carab
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Gender:
Posts: 16
To me it's odd that Intel is the most advertised and sought after processor and yet studies show that AMD with quanti-speed architecture is actually much faster.
32 bit and 64 bit. 64 bit requires a whole different setup than what I have. I am happy with my my AMD processor although I need to up it a little to enjoy the full possibilities of FS 04.
P.S. This is not a flame
System specs:&&Gigabyte 7NNXP Motherboard&&AMD Athlon XP Mobile 2600+ CPU OCed @ 2400MHz, liquid cooled&&Gigabyte 6800GT AGP Stock settings&&1,536MB, 400MHz, Geil, duel channel, RAM&&Duel WD Raptors in RAID0&&560w Thermaltake PSU
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Dec 30
th
, 2003 at 5:43am
daveyboy
Offline
2nd Lieutenant
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 1
Has anyone out there actually run FS2004 on an AMD64?
My understanding is that the AMD64 would be running in its 32-bit compatibility mode (since Win and FS2004 are 32-bit apps), so you wouldn't see any increase in performance over a 32-bit Athlon processor running at the same clock speed. (If you see what I mean!
)
In fact, I saw some benchmarks carried out on the new 64-bit chip that suggest it might even be *slower* when running 32-bit applications.
If that's the case, then anyone wishing to use their machine purely for fs2004 might do better to go for a cheaper (32-bit) Athlon or Pentium running at the same clock speed, and spend the extra cash on RAM or a better video card.
I'm currently weighing up the 64-bit/32-bit question for a new PC, so any ideas/opinions/abuse would be gratefully received...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Dec 30
th
, 2003 at 1:11pm
Dan
Offline
Colonel
Meet Bogart! Thanks CRAIG!
Carmarthenshire, Wales, Uk!
Gender:
Posts: 2053
Quote:
/abuse
LMAO
Dan
&&
3DMark01
||
OCUK - The best UK shop
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Dec 30
th
, 2003 at 4:37pm
bm
Offline
Colonel
UK
Gender:
Posts: 1177
Hi Daveyboy, Im afraid I don't I don't know much about computers (so don't listen!) but I have a new machine on the way (see below).
I am slightly regretting my decision not to go for the AMD64 now. I think the Pentium 4 3.2Ghz is the best short term solution (benchmarks etc prove this) but the world will be moving on to 64bit proccessors. Who can tell whether the game developement people with discard the 32bit stuff sooner or later. Hopefully it will be later from my point of view!*
*I knew I shouldn't have bought this months computer shopper (Febuary in January - the world is mad!) but I found the world of computers quite interesting! The sooner this new one arrives I can stop worrying!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Dec 31
st
, 2003 at 7:51am
Dan
Offline
Colonel
Meet Bogart! Thanks CRAIG!
Carmarthenshire, Wales, Uk!
Gender:
Posts: 2053
64bit - drool
&&
3DMark01
||
OCUK - The best UK shop
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Jan 1
st
, 2004 at 12:28pm
4_Series_Scania
Offline
Colonel
He who laughs last, thinks
slowest.
Stoke on Trent England U.K.
Gender:
Posts: 3638
Quote:
Hi Daveyboy, Im afraid I don't I don't know much about computers (so don't listen!) but I have a new machine on the way (see below).
I am slightly regretting my decision not to go for the AMD64 now. I think the Pentium 4 3.2Ghz is the best short term solution (benchmarks etc prove this) but the world will be moving on to 64bit proccessors. Who can tell whether the game developement people with discard the 32bit stuff sooner or later. Hopefully it will be later from my point of view!*
*I knew I shouldn't have bought this months computer shopper (Febuary in January - the world is mad!) but I found the world of computers quite interesting! The sooner this new one arrives I can stop worrying!
I think your fears are somewhat unjustified birdman,
Cast your mind back, remember the many people who rushed out to buy the then new Sct423 Pentium 4's? within months of the new platform's launch Intel went and re-designed the chip, onto a Sct 478 platform and overnight all the "new" p4's were utterly obsolete!
My advice with any new Processor range is to wait and see what revisions (i.e. bug/glitch fixes) they iron out first, wait for the new chip to settle on something representing a standard spec, then perhaps take the plunge.
Not forgetting, in this time of waiting and seeing, the price will keep falling not to mention the sound of Intel's 64Bit p5 in the distance,will be getting very loud by then .
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Jan 1
st
, 2004 at 1:01pm
bm
Offline
Colonel
UK
Gender:
Posts: 1177
Im afraid I can't cast my mind back! I am completely new to all this computer stuff! I only took an interest when this computer started messing around! I had no Idea a month or two ago what all the bits were inside! (you get the picture!)!!! (and that you could get a slow motherboard!!!)
I am getting over my goosebumps now. I realize what I read was someone from AMD scaring everybody into getting an 64bit CPU with there new computer! And he obviosly has no motive other then to direct people to do the right thing
Oh well, we'll see!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Jan 1
st
, 2004 at 5:54pm
4_Series_Scania
Offline
Colonel
He who laughs last, thinks
slowest.
Stoke on Trent England U.K.
Gender:
Posts: 3638
Quote:
I realize what I read was someone from AMD scaring everybody into getting an 64bit CPU with there new computer! And he obviosly has no motive other then to direct people to do the right thing
Oh well, we'll see!
Welcome to the honest & truthful world of PC marketing, I advise you leave any morals or principles of fair play here at the door.
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Jan 7
th
, 2004 at 10:33am
congo
Offline
Colonel
Make BIOS your Friend
Australia
Gender:
Posts: 3663
Give it to 'em Scania!
Mainboard: Asus P5K-Premium, CPU=Intel E6850 @ x8x450fsb 3.6ghz, RAM: 4gb PC8500 Team Dark, Video: NV8800GT, HDD: 2x1Tb Samsung F3 RAID-0 + 1Tb F3, PSU: Antec 550 Basiq, OS: Win7x64, Display: 24" WS LCD
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
4
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware ««
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.