Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
General
›
General Discussion
› Battle of Britain: Failure
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
...
8
Battle of Britain: Failure (Read 2518 times)
Reply #30 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 5:01am
Silent Exploder
Ex Member
if you look at my war plans,hagar,you'd see that i already had taken care of it by building more
long-range
bombers before the war.
hitler thought that d-day was a major bluff by the allied forces ,so he didn't want to send more ground forces to the french coast.
just imagine what would have happened,if loads of tigers and panthers had welcomed the allies at the beaches, covered by the luftwaffe...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 6:10am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
if you look at my war plans,hagar,you'd see that i already had taken care of it by building more
long-range
bombers before the war.
This would have involved a completely different strategy. As I understand it, Blitzkreig tactics was based on relatively short-range air strikes swiftly followed up on the ground. You would also need long-range fighters to protect the bombers to guarantee any sort of success. It would take much longer this way & with its lack of material resources a prolonged campaign would not have suited Germany.
Quote:
hitler thought that d-day was a major bluff by the allied forces ,so he didn't want to send more ground forces to the french coast.
just imagine what would have happened,if loads of tigers and panthers had welcomed the allies at the beaches, covered by the luftwaffe...
Things look different in hindsight. It's easy enough to speculate & say "what if?" when you know the full facts. There might well have been other reasons for this not being done. The history of WWII reads as a succession of blunders made by both sides. As I've said before, it's the side that makes the least mistakes that wins the day.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 6:41am
Silent Exploder
Ex Member
well,this is almost a "what if..." thread, or at least a "how would you..." one.
p.s: 109s with drop tanks?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 6:47am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
well,this is almost a "what if..." thread, or at least a "how would you..." one.
I think "how would you" is best. If we keep going over the same old stuff we'll still be arguing about it this time next year.
Quote:
p.s: 109s with drop tanks?
I'm sure this was tried. I don't remember when or how successful it was.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 6:49am
Silent Exploder
Ex Member
no,this was a sort of comment on your long-range fighter proposal. 109s could surely carry drop taks,but (if i'm right) just from the "friedrich" upwards...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 7:33am
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
Quote:
The Luftwaffe were unable to gain the air superiority an I don't know enough about the Kriegsmarine to make an educated assessment.
The Kreigsmarine in WWII was never fit to tackle a fleet engagement with the Royal Navy.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 11:39am
Silent Exploder
Ex Member
i wouldn't say this. take many submarines plus the bismark, the scharnhorst and many airplanes as air cover and you get a nice little slaughter.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 1:33pm
Scorpiоn
Offline
Colonel
Take it easy!
The Alamo
Gender:
Posts: 4496
Oh yeah, this is before the Bismark is even completed!
Okay, lets say nearly the entire German force is there to support the invasion, Kriegsmarine, Luftwaffe and Wehrmacht. Could it be successful then?
EDIT:
Oops, Mr. Booko says Bismark was completed Febuary 14, 1939. Whoopsie.
The Devil's Advocate.
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 4:11pm
Woodlouse2002
Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England
Gender:
Posts: 12574
Bismark was a full fathom five by the time germany was planning to invade.
Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 8:40pm
Scorpiоn
Offline
Colonel
Take it easy!
The Alamo
Gender:
Posts: 4496
Is there any way Germany could have done what it planned to sucessfully!?
The Devil's Advocate.
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #40 -
Nov 23
rd
, 2003 at 8:46pm
Crumbso
Offline
Colonel
The Sea Vixen - You aint'
never seen such a fox!!!
West Sussex, England
Gender:
Posts: 1794
I don't know conquering the world is pretty hard. I should know I tried it myself
(only got as far as the end of my street then I had to come in for tea
)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #41 -
Nov 24
th
, 2003 at 11:28am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
I haven't read the whole thread, I've just breezed through. I don't have the stamina for that right now. But to answer the original question posed by Scorpion.
(What would have to have happened for the Battle of Britain to have been lost?).
I say this.
I think it's quite simple (and may already have been said, so my apologies if it has).
Hitlers biggest mistake of that period was his Sept 7th decision to stop hitting the RAF airfields and to start bombing the cities.
This gave the RAF the breathing space it needed to recover. No-one can possibly argue that the RAF were on their knees at this stage and if Hitler hadn't have changed tactics, the BoB at least, in my opinion, would have been lost and Germany may well have acheived air superiority.
That's the answer to the fundimental question that Scorpion asked. What would have happened after Germany won the BoB, I don't know, but that is how Germany couls easily have won that particular battle, in a relatively short time.
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #42 -
Nov 24
th
, 2003 at 11:50am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
I've gone back and done a bit of reading now.
Notwithstanding Hagars knowledgable comments regarding the reserve fighters and airfields in the rear, I don't think these would have saved the day in the BoB had Germany kept the pressure on the RAF.
With regard to:
Quote:
A program that I watched recently implied, well stated, that sealion was an elaborate bluff intended to get Britain to negotiate peace.
I have heard this. I have also read that Germany didn't have half the amount of landing craft and support shipping to support this kind of landing operation.
She also had absolutely no experience whatsoever in amphibious operations.
As for 109's and drop tanks:
The 109 was not a stable enough aircraft to mount that kind of weight on. It was also a very small plane, one of the smallest. The were dangerous enough to get off the ground and land, let alone with an extra 800 to 100 lbs on the wings (if the wings could take the weight and hardpoints!
I have seen a few pictures of 109's with drop tanks (or a drop tank under the belly), but I don't think I've ever seen one in the air.
I also read that Germany didn't have the aluminium to spare for drop tanks. In fact those that did carry them towards the end were under strict orders not to drop them unless it was a matter of life and death, because they couldn't spare the resources.
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #43 -
Nov 24
th
, 2003 at 12:18pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I also read that Germany didn't have the aluminium to spare for drop tanks. In fact those that did carry them towards the end were under strict orders not to drop them unless it was a matter of life and death, because they couldn't spare the resources.
This shouldn't have been a problem. I believe the RAF drop tanks were made of compressed cardboard. Aluminium was far too valuable a resource to waste on things like that.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #44 -
Nov 24
th
, 2003 at 2:56pm
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Quote:
This shouldn't have been a problem. I believe the RAF drop tanks were made of compressed cardboard. Aluminium was far too valuable a resource to waste on things like that.
Is that so.........................I'll have to see if I can find where I read it. It was fairly recently too. I recall it distinctly.
Although, as we've discussed on many occasions, there is so much 'fiction' kicking about concerning this period.
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
...
8
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion ««
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.