Simviation Forum - Piper, Lancair, Mooney in wich category's?

	Search the archive:

Simviation Main Site | Site Search | Upload Images

Simviation Forum › Old Flight Simulator Series › FS 2002 › Piper, Lancair, Mooney in wich category's?

(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Piper, Lancair, Mooney in wich category's? (Read 187 times)

Nov 21^st, 2003 at 1:44pm

Fredgirardo Offline
Colonel
Montreal

Gender:
Posts: 144

Hi everybody,

In wich category's you will classified those airplanes: Piper, Socata, Lancair, Money, etc?

Does somebody knows other mark of the same category's of those airplanes?

Thanks

IP Logged

Reply #1 - Nov 21^st, 2003 at 2:17pm

OTTOL Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)

Gender:
Posts: 918

High performance single? In the case of the Lancair..............Columbia ? ......360? The early ones are Experimental.

.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......

IP Logged

Reply #2 - Nov 22^nd, 2003 at 5:12pm

BFMF Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender:
Posts: 19820

What specific aircraft do you want to know? A manufacturer can have a lot of different types like Piper for example.

Piper has aircraft is several different classes like, single engine, multi engine, high performance, complex, land, sea, and some are taildragers

COMPLETED: If Anyone Cares, Here's A Map Of My Current FSX Flight Around The World

My Reality Check Bounced

IP Logged

Reply #3 - Nov 22^nd, 2003 at 5:27pm

Nexus Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...

Gender:
Posts: 3282

As a "jet" lover I call them turbofan-less Roll Eyes

PS Aint it funny how people always think of turbofan driven aircrafts as a jet. I mean the turboprops/fans/jets are all turbine engines which goes under the category of "Jets". Right?
???

IP Logged

Reply #4 - Nov 23^rd, 2003 at 11:29pm

OTTOL Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)

Gender:
Posts: 918

Quote:

As a "jet" lover I call them turbofan-less Roll Eyes

PS Aint it funny how people always think of turbofan driven aircrafts as a jet.
???

Uuuhhhh..............I guess you don't consider the F-14 and F-16 "JETS"? ?

.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......

IP Logged

Reply #5 - Nov 24^th, 2003 at 8:19am

Fredgirardo Offline
Colonel
Montreal

Gender:
Posts: 144

Ok,

Let me reformulate my question: Does somebody knows other High performance single airplanes manufacturer ?

IP Logged

Reply #6 - Nov 24^th, 2003 at 8:34am

Nexus Offline
Colonel
The greater of two evils...

Gender:
Posts: 3282

You seem to miss the point OTTOL

The planes you mentioned are turbofans (at least bthe F-16) if I'm not mistaken. But how many of your "regular Joe" friends would call a SAAB340 a jet, which it rightfully is since it's a turboprop

Turboprops =SAAB340; Dash-8's etc
Turbofan = All boeing and Airbus types, even the F-16's Wink

Turbojet = Concorde or the DeHavilland 106 Comet which didn't use high-bypass fans

Sorry Fred for the offtopic discussion, my bad Undecided

IP Logged

Reply #7 - Nov 24^th, 2003 at 10:00am

Wing Nut Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender:
Posts: 14173

I would classify them as General Aviation or just light planes. Or just props... 8)

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!

IP Logged

Pages: 1

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

« Home

‹ Board

Top of this page