I think it was the 1979 season that the cheifs last won a super bowl.  that year also has the excact same calender dates as this year.  that year, the cheifs lost to the bengals by the excact same score.  and in the 11th week, they lost to the Raiders.

is this forshadowing what is to come?  it will be interesting to see what happens.  sunday rain and possibly snow is expected, so that will make it an interesting game(and fun for me while i try to drive in it!)

It was 1969.. SB IV  over the Vikings. One year after the Jets upset the Colts and three years after losing to Green Bay in SB I  ...

hoowdy richie, I think carolina stand a much better chance of making it to the superbowl than the rams, they have a better league standing and an easier season end in my opinion than St. Louis. it actually looks like seattle could go through from their division with st louis only getting a wildcard spot.
As for KC they really have been handed a bad end to the season, they have three divisonal games in a row, Oakland this weekend san diego the next and Denver the next, they will have a tough enough time against Oakland who i think are due for a win(although officially i still dont like them:)) and Denver will be back to almost full strength baring any unfortunate injurys this week, and this time they wont loose. that would then put them at 9-4 and Denver 9-4, with denver leading the standings(assuming SD can win aswell) its gonna be a close finish in the AFC this year New England Indianapolis Kansas city and Denver all have a shot of going to the superbowl.
sorry it was longwinded.
i see either a Seattle-Denver, or seattle New England superbowl.
If its seattle-Denver i see Denver winning
if its NE then new England will prob win

What surprises me about KC is they have only had success in the past when they had a very talented QB.  I personally don't feel that Trent Green is that great-he's good but nothing too special.  Anyway, when they were always successiful in the past they were either quarterbacked by Len Dawson (Super Bowl I, & IV) and then the only time they got close to the title again was when they had aging QB Joe Montana under center.  I just find it suprising since they used to have a system where they needed a franchise QB but now they are having great success without one.  I wonder if it's just because they have a great running back ot just a new system that Vermeal has brought.  Thats just something that I noticed. 

Also, I think that people are reading too much into the Bengals win.  These are not the Bengals of last year or the 1990s.  These Bengals are good and having success.  They are 5-5 and on top of their divison and gaining momentium.  The way they are playing, they are acting like the Bengals who played in the 1980's-the team that went to 2 Super Bowl's in that decade.  This year is not their year, but don't count them out in the future.  The Bengals may be very good a few years down the road.