Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
This game is biased (Read 1837 times)
Oct 23rd, 2003 at 5:06pm

Wing Nut   Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender: male
Posts: 14173
*****
 
How come whenever I'm flying a Thunderbolt it only takes one or two hits to shoot me down, but when I'm shooting at one I can hit him 30 times and he won't go down?  This has happened more than once too... Roll Eyes Angry
 

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Oct 23rd, 2003 at 6:16pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
No need to get all touchy because he's the better pilot. Tongue

I find it usually takes well in excess of 20 hits to take me down. You can't expect to lob a plane round the sky when its damaged and get the same effect as one fresh off the runway. After you've been hit you've gotta be more gentle and scram. Tongue
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Oct 24th, 2003 at 4:25am

krist3   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 27
*****
 
i agree i also think this game is biased the same thing happens with me. And when ever i get hit by flak the engine shuts down (i thought the engine was meant to be air cooled and reliable)
isn't the thunderbolt meant to be durable??
it isn't when i fly but when i go against them they are
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Oct 24th, 2003 at 6:44pm

Iroquois   Offline
Colonel
Happy Halloween
Ontario Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 3244
*****
 
True. I'll be chasing a Zero in my Corsair and I'll have to pump him full of bullets to get him down. A couple shots from one that seeks up on me and I fly out of control into the ground.

A zero has little armor plating.
A Corsair is heavely armored like most Pacific USM fighters.
 

I only pretend to know what I'm talking about. Heck, that's what lawyers, car mechanics, and IT professionals do everyday. Wink&&The Rig: &&AMD Athlon XP2000+ Palomino, ECS K7S5A 3.1, 1GB PC2700 DDR, Geforce FX5200 128mb, SB Live Platinum, 16xDVD, 16x10x40x CDRW, 40/60gb 7200rpm HDD, 325w Power, Windows XP Home SP1, Directx 9.0c with 66.81 Beta gfx drivers
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Oct 25th, 2003 at 12:06am

1danny   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 150
*****
 
Roll Eyeshave your munitions c.o. make hotter loads for your guns Grinmake your guns stronger Grin

get really close
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Oct 31st, 2003 at 1:22am

nickle   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
San Diego, Ca

Gender: male
Posts: 342
*****
 
CFS3 is biased on damage likely requiring more hits on an AI target as a means of making the sim more of a challange.  The AI's are inept.
The N is firing 20mm and the 47 50 cal.  The 20 produces 2.5 times the damage of the 50 cal.  So 30 hits of the 50 is 12 of the 20mm.  More than enough to bring down a 47.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Nov 1st, 2003 at 10:47pm

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
Make sure you get REALLLY close! if you are more than 300 yards away you will likely miss 50% or more of your shots! This is why I love the Hurri! I get REALLY close and pump the enemy full of lead!
 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Nov 1st, 2003 at 10:51pm

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
Oh and about the zero thing. On normal firepower it usually takes me a 0.5-1 second burst with 8 .303s so I don't know why you can barely shoot the zero down in a corsair.
 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Nov 4th, 2003 at 7:30pm

nickle   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
San Diego, Ca

Gender: male
Posts: 342
*****
 
Pretty amazing that someone can sneak up behind an AI in a dogfight given that the AI has perfect knowledge of opponent location.
It does happen in occasionally CFS3, never in CFS2.
Real world 8th/9th USAAF fighter groups: Firing range is whatever they could get.  Some liked and attained very close, some not.  Much BS on this subject in 1944 reports.
On the 303:
A relic of WWI.
The 50 has 6 times the damage capability of the BB gun.
The 20 has 23 times the damage capabiltity of the BB gun.
The 303 effective range was so limited that collision was a good outcome of a firing pass.
Note that the 303 was replaced by the 20mm by the BR's end of the BOB. The 303 was retained as a varmit killer.  And I do mean groundhog.
The tragedy of the 303 is that so many were KIA due to obsolescent and inadequate fighter weapons.
The 20 had 2 times the kill range of the 50 in addition to it's superior damage capability.

 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Nov 6th, 2003 at 5:50pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
Pretty amazing that someone can sneak up behind an AI in a dogfight given that the AI has perfect knowledge of opponent location.
It does happen in occasionally CFS3, never in CFS2.



This isn't true. I can tell you how many times I bounced a flight of Zekes in CFS2. On one occasion I was between the two wingmen before I blew the leader to hell. The wingmen then broke towards eachother and collided. Destoryed an entire flight in 5 seconds. Tongue
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Nov 6th, 2003 at 8:00pm

SabreHawk   Offline
Colonel
Off we go......
Seattle, Wa. USA

Gender: male
Posts: 492
*****
 
Well I have to admit that it does seem to be a bit more difficult to take down enemy fighters, even tho you are getting what seems to be alot of hits on them, and it seems to take very few hit's on yourself to be in trouble.

Hmmm im wondering, I havent seen any options to adjust your gun convergence in CFS3 so far unless Im not looking in the right place.
If this could be adjusted( and it can on the real planes) that would help, as it would let one get the distance of convergance out further, or in closer depending on your expected combat situation, or for just your personal shooting/attack style.
The convergance to me seems a bit to close in for my comfort. Wink
 

...
&& [center]
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Nov 7th, 2003 at 11:46am

nickle   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
San Diego, Ca

Gender: male
Posts: 342
*****
 
Woody:
1 v 1, ace, neutral
You won't sneak up on a Zeke.
You didn't sneak up on the Zeke section even with an advantage.  They broke into you.

Try 1 v 2, 1 JA6M3-32, ace, neutral.
Let us know how it turns out.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Nov 7th, 2003 at 4:49pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
The 303 effective range was so limited that collision was a good outcome of a firing pass.
Note that the 303 was replaced by the 20mm by the BR's end of the BOB. The 303 was retained as a varmit killer.  And I do mean groundhog.
The tragedy of the 303 is that so many were KIA due to obsolescent and inadequate fighter weapons.
The 20 had 2 times the kill range of the 50 in addition to it's superior damage capability.


Actually this isn't true. The 303 wasn't much less effective than the 50 at close range. At a range of 250 yards a two second burst from a 303 will rip a plane to shreds. When there are 8 of them in a row it is quite effective.
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Nov 7th, 2003 at 6:02pm
Bob_Ruff   Ex Member

 
Quote:
Well I have to admit that it does seem to be a bit more difficult to take down enemy fighters, even tho you are getting what seems to be alot of hits on them, and it seems to take very few hit's on yourself to be in trouble.

Hmmm im wondering, I havent seen any options to adjust your gun convergence in CFS3 so far unless Im not looking in the right place.
If this could be adjusted( and it can on the real planes) that would help, as it would let one get the distance of convergance out further, or in closer depending on your expected combat situation, or for just your personal shooting/attack style.
The convergance to me seems a bit to close in for my comfort. Wink


You can adjust the convergence by opening your xdp file (in notebook) located in youe plane's folder. You will see the guns near the top, just scroll over to the convergence, almost always 300 and change it to what ever you want. Click file, then save. This will disqualify the plane from MP, though.

The sim is exactly as you guys are saying.
When I built the BoB JG-2 missions, I had the hardest time with the RAF fighters. Could hit them 100 times and more. But, scratch the paint on my 109 and she couldn't fly anymore. I am finishing BoB bomber and BoB RAF fighter ( same missions, just switching to new cockpit) with the soon to be released 1% Spitfire Mk1A (What a super plane and great cockpit) Well I don't know why those German bums had no guts when they flew with me, but they are terrors now that I'm in the RAF. God save the queen, they are kicking my ass. And, the Spit that was as tough as a King Tiger is now made of fine china.
That is just how it is.
When I first started BoB JG-2 fighter testing, I thought I would never master the 109 over the Spit. But, I learned its strong points and eventually tamed the super Spit. It really made me a better sim pilot to be at a disadvantage. Download that Mig-15-931 and get the two missions at SOH and you will be glad to get back to whatever crate with a prop
Wulfmann
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Nov 7th, 2003 at 7:47pm

SabreHawk   Offline
Colonel
Off we go......
Seattle, Wa. USA

Gender: male
Posts: 492
*****
 
Well I'll be dipped in cat dukie,......thank you Bob, I'll do that. Heh, I knew there had be a way, but im barely knowlegeable enough to install planes and such, much less other things of that nature. Wink But im learnin, im learnin. 8)
 

...
&& [center]
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Nov 9th, 2003 at 8:53pm

nickle   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
San Diego, Ca

Gender: male
Posts: 342
*****
 
Woody
The kinetic energy of the 303 vs the 50 and 20 is not a matter of belief.  The 303 was an ineffective weapon. A matter of fact.
Why else would the BR's go to 20's?  Why the US did not is a mystery.
Your estimate of 700 ft effective is exaggerated for the 303.
The 303 and similar were only secondary to main armament in fighters after 1940.
Same problem in the P-40B.  Two 50's and four 30's were ineffective.  Subsequent versions had 50's; 4 on the D and 6 on the E.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Nov 21st, 2003 at 8:27pm

Smoke2much   Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,

Posts: 3879
*****
 
If the .303 was so ineffective can you please explain the losses inflicted on the Luftwaffe during the summer of 1940 by the Hurricane Squadrons of Southern Command RAF.

Thankyou.

Will
 

Who switched the lights off?  I can't see a thing.......  Hold on, my eyes were closed.  Oops, my bad...............&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Nov 21st, 2003 at 8:34pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
Woody

Your estimate of 700 ft effective is exaggerated for the 303.

The 700ft thing was tried and tested by the RAF and it worked. Why else did the Luftwaffe lose the battle of britain? The Bf109's and 110's had cannon. And they lost far more aircraft. Tongue
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Nov 23rd, 2003 at 9:38pm
Bob_Ruff   Ex Member

 
The RAF did not officially recognise kills so any claim was excepted. Any pilot claiming a shared kill, got a half a kill. So if 6 pilots claimed the same plane, 3 German planes were reported downed. The RAF counted and picked up every German plane that crashed during BoB. Between Aug8 and Sept 11, they claimed 1631 kills with 582 probables, yet only had 316 wrecked Luftwaffe planes. The Luftwaffe did not consider a claim unless there was at least one other eye witness. If more than one pilot claimed the same plane, the unit got one kill and neither pilot received anything. It is interesting to note that German unit Kill claim records and RAF official British Plane losses are nearly indentical. The British knew these claims were wild exagerations, but needed the moral boost to their people on the brink of defeat. All the British had to do was keep Germany from having total control of the skies until the weather turned to bad for a German invasion. That was much easier than trying to eliminate the RAF. The Luftwaffe almost did it,but Churchill starting the city wars saved the RAF and Britain. Had the Germans not turned to bomb London and finished the RAF as they should have, things would have been different. Churchill's bold move saved England and Hitler fell for it. Hitler snatched defeat from the jaws of victory!
Wulfmann Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Nov 25th, 2003 at 12:30pm

nickle   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
San Diego, Ca

Gender: male
Posts: 342
*****
 
The 700ft thing was tried and tested by the RAF and it worked. Why else did the Luftwaffe lose the battle of britain? The Bf109's and 110's had cannon. And they lost far more aircraft. 

Br came very close to losing the BOB.  A number of reasons they prevailed.
Dumb decision by Goering to cease attacks on Br airfields and radar sites.  The N's were close to control of the air when they switched tactics.
Extreme range for the 109's.  The N's lost many to fuel starvation with their pilots in the Channel. Made worse by orders to stay with the bombers even with low fuel warning lights.
Radar
The 303 was a Br legacy from WW1 along with outdated fighter tactics.  The reason the 303 was used because it was available and nothing more.  The Br's were prepared to fight the last war. 
Excellent docudrama is Piece of Cake aired in 1990, 50 th anniversary BOB.  Best fighter flick ever made.
Read Churchill's statement re BOB.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Nov 25th, 2003 at 4:13pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
Br came very close to losing the BOB.  A number of reasons they prevailed.
Dumb decision by Goering to cease attacks on Br airfields and radar sites.  The N's were close to control of the air when they switched tactics.
Extreme range for the 109's.  The N's lost many to fuel starvation with their pilots in the Channel. Made worse by orders to stay with the bombers even with low fuel warning lights.
Radar
The 303 was a Br legacy from WW1 along with outdated fighter tactics.  The reason the 303 was used because it was available and nothing more.  The Br's were prepared to fight the last war.  
Excellent docudrama is Piece of Cake aired in 1990, 50 th anniversary BOB.  Best fighter flick ever made.
Read Churchill's statement re BOB.

'Piece of Cake' was a series written in the 1950's by someone who didn't even take part in the conflict.

.303 was used because the round was used in the British service rifle and so was being churned out by the million anyway. Also the browning .30 cal machinegun was easily converted to .303 caliber.

The .303 from WWI would either be the Lewis or Vickers K machine guns. The Lewis gun, which was water cooled wasn't used in aircraft. The Vickers K was used only as a rear gun on aircraft like the Swordfish and NOT Spitfires and Hurricanes.

And during the battle for france the british fighter pilots found out that the eight .303 machine guns were more than suitable at a range of 260 yards or less. Wink
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Dec 14th, 2003 at 5:03pm

nickle   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
San Diego, Ca

Gender: male
Posts: 342
*****
 
'Piece of Cake' was a series written in the 1950's by someone who didn't even take part in the conflict.

.303 was used because the round was used in the British service rifle and so was being churned out by the million anyway. Also the browning .30 cal machinegun was easily converted to .303 caliber. 

The .303 from WWI would either be the Lewis or Vickers K machine guns. The Lewis gun, which was water cooled wasn't used in aircraft. The Vickers K was used only as a rear gun on aircraft like the Swordfish and NOT Spitfires and Hurricanes.

And during the battle for france the british fighter pilots found out that the eight .303 machine guns were more than suitable at a range of 260 yards or less.   

Note that most documentaries are made well after the event.  Shouldn't be a hard to understand.

The problem was that WWI weapons were not adequate for WWII with reference to the 303.

If you know Br fighter pilot gun preference 303 to 20 mm, state your source.

Max effective range 303 is 163 meters
Max effective range 20 mm is 1085 meters

And Woody wants the manly weapon? 
Sounds like WWI pilots and the parachute issue.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Dec 14th, 2003 at 5:35pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
If you know Br fighter pilot gun preference 303 to 20 mm, state your source.

Max effective range 303 is 163 meters
Max effective range 20 mm is 1085 meters

And Woody wants the manly weapon?  
Sounds like WWI pilots and the parachute issue.


Douglas Bader prefered the eight .303 option and had the only Spitfire MkVa in the tangmere wing because of that.
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Dec 14th, 2003 at 6:12pm

4_Series_Scania   Offline
Colonel
He who laughs last, thinks
slowest.
Stoke on Trent England U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 3638
*****
 
Another reason (apart from the fact Hitler was a strategic muppet!)  the Luftwaffe lost the B.o.B was Herr Hartmann was serving Over Romania and later on the eastern front.

Had his 352 confirmed kill's been on the Western front, who knows?

 

Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Dec 14th, 2003 at 6:17pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
Another reason (apart from the fact Hitler was a strategic muppet!)  the Luftwaffe lost the B.o.B was Herr Hartmann was serving Over Romania and later on the eastern front.

Had his 352 confirmed kill's been on the Western front, who knows?


Had his 352 kills been on the western front then it probably would have been less than 100 kills. We all know that the eastern aircraft were cannon fodder to the 109's and 190's intill the La-5. Wink
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Dec 15th, 2003 at 9:55pm

chomp_rock   Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.

Gender: male
Posts: 2718
*****
 
No the .303 was only inefective when not used in groups. 8 .303s pack enough firepower to rip any plane to bits. You just have to get close because the .303 fires bullets at 500rpm and does not have enough powder in the small cartridge to send them very far.
 

AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Dec 17th, 2003 at 10:28am
Bob_Ruff   Ex Member

 
The effective range of a MG-151 20MM may be 1,000 yds, but not the short barreled open bolted FF used on the 109E-3 and 4s during BoB. They had less range thean the 303 and the pilots relied more on their 2 8MM Mausers. With only two of them, but allot of ammo, they did the job, because the pilots were good enough to adapt. Had the British tested the 20MMFF sooner, they would not have had such a high opinion as they later admitted.

Erich Hartmann was still in school during BoB. He was not in Russia for the "easy kills" but faced a determined, well trained and equiped Russian foe and earned his kills. He also shot down 7 US P-51Ds. In one engagement, he downed 5 and outmanuvered the rest of the 7 survivors until he ran out of fuel and had to bail.
When in Soviet prison he was tauted as the greatest fighter pilot by Soviet officials for his kill record, but said he was not the highest scoring pilot. He said Hans Marsailles shot down 158 British planes and since a British plane equals 3 Russian planes, that made Hans the top scoring pilot. This infuriated the Russians (His intent). While funny, it is untrue. the Russians were quite good in the air, but they were being measured against some of the world's best.
In 1944 over Germany most US pilots faced young poorly trained kids. They never faced the tougher large groups as the Russians did.
Wulfmann
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Dec 17th, 2003 at 6:28pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
Quote:
Erich Hartmann was still in school during BoB. He was not in Russia for the "easy kills" but faced a determined, well trained and equiped Russian foe and earned his kills. He also shot down 7 US P-51Ds. In one engagement, he downed 5 and outmanuvered the rest of the 7 survivors until he ran out of fuel and had to bail.
When in Soviet prison he was tauted as the greatest fighter pilot by Soviet officials for his kill record, but said he was not the highest scoring pilot. He said Hans Marsailles shot down 158 British planes and since a British plane equals 3 Russian planes, that made Hans the top scoring pilot. This infuriated the Russians (His intent). While funny, it is untrue. the Russians were quite good in the air, but they were being measured against some of the world's best.
In 1944 over Germany most US pilots faced young poorly trained kids. They never faced the tougher large groups as the Russians did.
Wulfmann

I still consider the Bf109 to be a far better plane than almost anything the Russians came up with. And if the Russians were flying planes that were equal to or better than the Bf109 the Hartmann would not have got quite so many kills. Wink
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #28 - Dec 19th, 2003 at 2:51pm

4_Series_Scania   Offline
Colonel
He who laughs last, thinks
slowest.
Stoke on Trent England U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 3638
*****
 
Quote:
Erich Hartmann was still in school during BoB


Oh well, my theory shot down in flames!  Roll Eyes
 

Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
IP Logged
 
Reply #29 - Dec 20th, 2003 at 12:22pm
Bob_Ruff   Ex Member

 
Quote:
I still consider the Bf109 to be a far better plane than almost anything the Russians came up with. And if the Russians were flying planes that were equal to or better than the Bf109 the Hartmann would not have got quite so many kills. Wink



The Russian planes became equal and sometimes superior to the 109.
Hartmann scored 352 confirmed kills flying 1405 combat missions and was involved in 825 dogfights. That is one kill for every four missions and success less than half hi dogfights. Since he says he snuck up on 80% of his victums (281), that would mean he scored 71 victories in the other 544 duels. Or 7 out of 8 times the adversary got away.
Just running numbers.
An American pilot that flew 100 missions and score 30 kills would have a higher percentage.
Hartmann was amongst the crème of the crop and he was damn lucky to boot. There were other German pilots that would have scored higher numbers, except for the luck part. Hartmann was also a great man and a decent person. The Russians were excellent pilots by 1943 and the deterioration of German training in 44 gave the Soviets more than an advantage the last year of the war.
Wulfmann


 
IP Logged
 
Reply #30 - Dec 20th, 2003 at 2:00pm

Wing Nut   Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender: male
Posts: 14173
*****
 
 

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
IP Logged
 
Reply #31 - Jan 1st, 2004 at 1:46am

Nikoman   Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 9
*****
 
Pippen

Yes.   Grin

Very much so. It is very frustrating to unload several rounds of 30mm cannon into an allied fighter and watch it fly away without any visible signs of damage! But just go and try to fly trhe same fighter and it crumbles to pieces with just a few MG hits.

Is there a fix for this that doesn't involve re-writing aircraft cfg files? It sucks.

I think the computer doesn't like to lose so it tilts the model in it's own favor whatever plane you are flying.

Anyway, hopefully MS will patch this amusing little feature.

Arrgh!

Watch yer six.

Nikoman.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print