Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Thunderbolt Squadron Question (Read 739 times)
Oct 3rd, 2003 at 4:50am

Professor Brensec   Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Gender: male
Posts: 2955
*****
 
Last night I saw, for about the 4th time, the History Channel Special on the Thunderbolt, during the last months of the War. I taped it and watched it again to make sure of my facts - or at least, History Channel's facts). Grin

This particular Doco mainly contains footage from a colour 'Movie' that was commissioned by the USAAF, during the month of April and early May, in France and Germany.
It deals with a particular Fighter group (48 planes), the 362nd Thunderbolt Group (I think - I can check if anyone is specifically interested) based in Eastern France and then in Frankfurt. A major part of the film is about the 'crossing of the Rhine', in which this Squadron played a pivotal role in terms of ground support.
They have a couple of the Pilots who were in the Squadron at that time, as guest 'commentators' etc.

The Doco is called "Thunderbolts - Last Days of the Reich".  Grin Grin Wink

Anyway, before I go into any discussion about these amazing Planes, and their Pilots, I have a peculiar (at least I think it may be peculiar) question to ask. I would appreciate any insight that anyone may have.  Grin Wink

Much of the film shows P47's flying in formation, breaking, diving and firing on targets etc. The majority of the time 4 planes are shown, or groups of 4 (flights I believe they were officially called i.e. 4 x flights = 1 squardon of 16 etc).
Anyway, it seems almost always, the four P47's consist of 3 bubble canopy types and 1 razorback type.
I thought maybe, I was seeing the same group of four, over and over again, but when I checked, I noticed different tail and nose colours and markings on nearly all of them.
In fact, there is one shot where you can make out clearly, a full Squadron. It's taken from the air. There are four planes flying over to the right of the field, four just taken off, four on the runway, and four taxiing.
Each group has one Razorback type, and the rest are Bubbles.
What's more interesting is that all the Bubbles are silver with coloured tails and noses, and all the razors are Army green with coloured tails and noses.

What is the story here, if any?

Is there something a Razor can do that a bubble can't, or vice versa.
The only thing I can think of is they wanted to 'disperse' the razors, with their poorer visibility, among all the flights.

It seems to me that if I had four out of 16 planes green and of a different type, I would have them in the same flight and the other three flights would be silver bubbles.
Maybe I'm just a 'neat freak'..........lol Grin Cheesy Wink

I'm not sure but I wouldn't be surprised if out of the entire 48 planes there is an exact ration of 1 in 4 razors.

(Just a point of interest, for discussion, they quoted an average of 25 personnel to keep one plane in the air, at that time in the War).  Grin  Wink

 

...&&...&&http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Oct 3rd, 2003 at 6:43am

HawkerTempest5   Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom

Gender: male
Posts: 3149
*****
 
I've not seen this docco, but I have seen Thunderbolt, the colour movie shot in Italy late in the war. In this film too, there is a mix of types, bubble top and razor back. My thought is that they just used what they had and maybe the razors are replacement aircraft from a maintenance unit brought up to replace lost/damaged newer aircraft. Just a thought!
 

...
Flying Legends
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Oct 3rd, 2003 at 8:18am

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
Probably its to do with the distribution of new aircraft, and doing it evenly. Or like Roger said, availability.

Mark
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Oct 3rd, 2003 at 12:04pm

denishc   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1018
*****
 
Professor B,
  Can you tell what position in the flight of four that the Razorback P-47s are flying in.  Certainly olive drab Razorbacks are older aircraft then the Bubble Topped silver ones and during a time of transition from old to new to have a mix of aircraft models was not unusual.  Perhaps the older model P-47s were handed down to "Newbies" while the newer models went to "Old Hands", as the newer models became available.  If the Razorbacks are always "flying wing" then I would assume this is the case.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Oct 3rd, 2003 at 3:49pm

Sock   Offline
Colonel
Satan is cool.
Hudson, NY USA

Gender: male
Posts: 2098
*****
 
Well, the 9th Air Force got the new 47s second to the 8th.  So they didn't get the 25+ models till later.  The Razorbacks were painted olive drab because the USAAF thought it was the best mix of all ground colors.  By the wars end the Planes were coming off the line in the natural metal, 'silver', color because it took less time to get 'em to the front if you didn't paint them.  But they were basicly flyin tin foul!  The sun reflected off them that way, and they were easy to spot campaired to the camifloged British and German planes.  The paint on the nose and tail where squadron markings, and nose art.  The 'Old Hands' weren't always given the new planes.  Sometimes they were so in love with the older models they were relucent to fly a new plane.  Maybe they scored their first or fith kill in it, or maybe they were nearly shot down in it, but the plane got them home. 

The USAAF mainly used the 'Finger Four' formation, and I have no idea why the ravorbacks always fly tail-end charlie in the movie...But, maybe thats the way it worked. 

Sock

P.S.  Brensec, could send me a copy of that movie?   Wink  I've only seen it once before and it was a while ago.   Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Oct 3rd, 2003 at 10:35pm

OTTOL   Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)

Gender: male
Posts: 918
*****
 
Just as my 2cents......The "old plane/new pilot " theory makes the most sense to me. You would want the "kids" in the more expendable aircraft, and the greenhorns would be flying in the back of the formation. Sock's favorite airplane argument holds water, there was a lot of superstition involved with flying back then, but I think, more rare, was THIS case.
   Time for me to dig into the archives, and do some research.  Smiley
 

.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Oct 3rd, 2003 at 10:55pm

Professor Brensec   Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Gender: male
Posts: 2955
*****
 
I don't recall exactly where the razorback plane flies in each of the flights. oir even if there is a 'constant position'. if they are always in the same spot, I suppose there is a reason for it, as mentioned.

I'm at work now, so I'll check when I'm finished on Monday (I do 2 x 12 hrs shifts Sat & Sun, so there's not much time to do it till then).  Grin Wink
 

...&&...&&http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Oct 3rd, 2003 at 11:01pm

Professor Brensec   Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Gender: male
Posts: 2955
*****
 
Quote:
I've not seen this docco, but I have seen Thunderbolt, the colour movie shot in Italy late in the war. In this film too, there is a mix of types, bubble top and razor back. My thought is that they just used what they had and maybe the razors are replacement aircraft from a maintenance unit brought up to replace lost/damaged newer aircraft. Just a thought!


I think I've seen a colour Movie made in Italy also. But I'm sure it was about P51's.
There's probably a few that were made.

This one is definitely in Europe, in the places I mentioned. Oh, and I checked, it's definitely the 362nd Fighter Group.

Another interesting thing covered in the Movie. There was apparently a "Big offensive" day organised, to "knock the Luftwaffe out, once and for all".
I don't recall the day, but the figures they gave are: 905 German aircraft destroyed. In one day.

How could they ever have recovered from that?
Obviously they couldn't, and didn't!  Grin Wink
 

...&&...&&http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Oct 3rd, 2003 at 11:06pm

Sock   Offline
Colonel
Satan is cool.
Hudson, NY USA

Gender: male
Posts: 2098
*****
 
Well, then I'll say one more thing... It would make no sense to put the razorbacks in the tail-end Charlie position because they have the least visiblity, and that is the most likely spot to get hit from.  You'd want someone with a 360 degree vantige point.

As for my story of a favorte aircraft "holding water", I can quote a book I have about a 9th Air Force Thunderbolt fighter-bomber squadron.  They author takes an older razorback model instead of a newer model with the bubble canopy and a paddle blade prop, because when ever he flew that perticular Jug, he never got a single hole in the plane.  But that plane was later fitted with a baddle blade prop.

Sock
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 12:48am

Professor Brensec   Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Gender: male
Posts: 2955
*****
 
I imagine the pilots would have become quite attached to a particular plane, especially if they had spent some reasonable time in it, and survived.  Grin

Tell me, did the newer bubble type have a more powerful R2800 engine, or any feature that would have made it all that better than a Razorback. Except for the visibility, of course.

If you consider the visibility question as a real disadvantgae, then this could well be why the Razorbacks were dispersed among the bubbles. So that there were 3 bubbles around, to look out for the plane with less visibility........maybe?.  Grin Wink
 

...&&...&&http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 1:05am

OTTOL   Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)

Gender: male
Posts: 918
*****
 
Quote:
As for my story of a favorte aircraft "holding water", I can quote a book I have about a 9th Air Force Thunderbolt fighter-bomber squadron.  They author takes an older razorback model instead of a newer model with the bubble canopy and a paddle blade prop, because when ever he flew that perticular Jug, he never got a single hole in the plane..........................

Sock
Uh............I was agreeing with you dude!
 

.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 7:59am

HawkerTempest5   Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom

Gender: male
Posts: 3149
*****
 
Bubble top "Jugs" suffered from the exact same problem as bubble top P-51's and Spitfires. The cut down rear fuselage gave less lateral stability than the high sided razorback versions. Later 51's and 47's had fin extensions fitted to help overcome this problem. Spits grew bigger tails. A lot of P-51 pilots were less than happy to give up their B/C models for newer D's because the B/C was faster and better handling. This could be the case with the Jugs also. Maybe the fact that a few razor backs are mixed in is because the pilot simply would rather have that type instead?
« Last Edit: Oct 4th, 2003 at 2:55pm by HawkerTempest5 »  

...
Flying Legends
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 8:19am

fido   Offline
Colonel
Oklahoma

Gender: male
Posts: 419
*****
 
   From what I have read, and can recall, early P-47D Razorbacks (yes there were both bubble canopy and Razorbacked D models) - the early Ds varied only a little from the Cs with only slight improvements in the tubrochargers, and added armour.  The C & D models both used the R2800-21 or the -59.  When the D model was modified to use the bubble canopy of the Hawker Typhoon, the engine was change to the R2800-63 and the paddle blade was added.

                     Fido

  P.S.  Seeing that I am new here, and do not know you all, I may have just restated the obvious. Sorry if I did, and please let me know.
 

A day at the office for my Dad (Ie Shima 1945)&&&&http://simviation.com/yabbuploads/CopyofDRAGONANDHISTAIL1SIMV.jpg&&&&May the sun be always at your six o'clock.
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 10:30am

Sock   Offline
Colonel
Satan is cool.
Hudson, NY USA

Gender: male
Posts: 2098
*****
 
Sorry OTTOL... Embarrassed

Hawk:  The P-47-25+ moldels did have stabilty probkems but much less than the P-51D.  As far as I know (which is'nt much on the 51) is that it never had a significant engine upgrade where large amounts of power were added.  You also need to remember that the 51 isn't as stable as the 47, which is good for a fighter, but the Jug was very stable from the start, and the bubble canopy didn't affect it as much.  And over the years the 47 got big boosts in power!  And became more and more power, sorta...The M models were the fastest Thunderbolts, but had a bad bach of engines.  So power was toned down a bit on the Ns.  The N was the biggest and badest of 'em all.  It wasn't as fast as the M, but was faster than all the rest.  It had a longer wing and squared off wing tips for some longer legs, and the biggest dorsal fin.  And it was the most manoverable.  But I can tell you this, The P-47 pilots were a lot more enthuseastic (Jezz I cannot spell for beans) about the new models than the P-51 pilots were.  Because each new model ofered more improvements than each new model P-51 did.

Fido:  You're more than right, and I doupt you repeated anything.  If anyone did, I must have.

Sock
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 10:01pm

denishc   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1018
*****
 
  Weren't the P-47Ns the lightest of the Thunderbolts and given longer range for use in the Pacific Theater?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 10:03pm

Sock   Offline
Colonel
Satan is cool.
Hudson, NY USA

Gender: male
Posts: 2098
*****
 
Quote:
 Weren't the P-47Ns the lightest of the Thunderbolts and given longer range for use in the Pacific Theater?


Yep.

Sock
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 10:30pm

denishc   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 1018
*****
 
  Interesting note on the P-47M, from what I've read, those that were camouflaged were not painted in standard Air Corps colors.  Supposedly the camo paint came from a British auto shop, which gave the M models unique hues of blue and violet.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 10:41pm

Professor Brensec   Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Gender: male
Posts: 2955
*****
 
Hawk, I know many pilots liked their P51B's. many Australian pilots refused 'point blank' to get out of them. They didn't need the far increased range of the D model in the South Western Pacific and I think most had the 6 x gun upgrade done, so they really didn't want them.
Most of you probably know that my favourite mount is the P51-B (as oppsed to my favourite looker - the P40).........lol Grin

Back to the P47. I see al the reasons for the Razors still being around and the fact that some may have preferred that plane etc etc. But my initial quandry was about the fact that this particular film continually shows that ratio of 1 x razor with 3 x bubbles. I was wondering if there was a specific reason for that 'constant'...........configuration in flights.  Grin Wink
 

...&&...&&http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Oct 4th, 2003 at 11:12pm

Sock   Offline
Colonel
Satan is cool.
Hudson, NY USA

Gender: male
Posts: 2098
*****
 
Quote:
 Interesting note on the P-47M, from what I've read, those that were camouflaged were not painted in standard Air Corps colors.  Supposedly the camo paint came from a British auto shop, which gave the M models unique hues of blue and violet.  


Yep.   Grin

Quote:
Back to the P47. I see al the reasons for the Razors still being around and the fact that some may have preferred that plane etc etc. But my initial quandry was about the fact that this particular film continually shows that ratio of 1 x razor with 3 x bubbles. I was wondering if there was a specific reason for that 'constant'...........configuration in flights.   


I don't know, at all.  Maybe it was a squadron or group signiture.  Like some squads liked to fly in diamond formations... ???  I don't know.

Sock
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Oct 5th, 2003 at 11:32am

fido   Offline
Colonel
Oklahoma

Gender: male
Posts: 419
*****
 
   Hey, if we are all just speculating, could it be the the groups in question were hoping the Germans would only see the bare metal Jugs and miss the olive drab one, leading to a supprise for the Hun.  At some point in the war weren't we trying to bait the Germans into a fight of attrition?  Just a thought. ???

              Fido
 

A day at the office for my Dad (Ie Shima 1945)&&&&http://simviation.com/yabbuploads/CopyofDRAGONANDHISTAIL1SIMV.jpg&&&&May the sun be always at your six o'clock.
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Oct 5th, 2003 at 12:27pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
I haven't seen this doco (wish I had) & know far too little about the P-47. I do know it's a mighty impressive looking machine.

From what Brensec is saying, this particular squadron were involved in ground support. I would assume they had adequate air cover & not expect to be in air to air combat. This is only a theory but maybe they used every aircraft they could get hold of. The razorbacks might then be equally distributed between flights. It sounds as good as any other theory to me unless anyone knows better. Roll Eyes
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Oct 5th, 2003 at 5:42pm

HawkerTempest5   Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom

Gender: male
Posts: 3149
*****
 
US 9th and British Second TAF were heavily engaged in ground support after D-Day and put just about everything they had to use, not just Typhoons and Jugs but Spits, Mustangs and P-38's also. A Razor would be just as effective in this roll as a Bubble and I really just think it was a case of "we've got 'em, so let's use 'em!"
 

...
Flying Legends
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Oct 5th, 2003 at 8:26pm

Sock   Offline
Colonel
Satan is cool.
Hudson, NY USA

Gender: male
Posts: 2098
*****
 
Quote:
I haven't seen this doco (wish I had) & know far too little about the P-47. I do know it's a mighty impressive looking machine.

From what Brensec is saying, this particular squadron were involved in ground support. I would assume they had adequate air cover & not expect to be in air to air combat. This is only a theory but maybe they used every aircraft they could get hold of. The razorbacks might then be equally distributed between flights. It sounds as good as any other theory to me unless anyone knows better. Roll Eyes


9th AF P-47s rarly had air cover.  And all USAAF figther pilots, regardless of role, were taught as fighter pilots to fly air-to-air missions.  Pilots were not taught much ground support tactics.  Many fighter-bomber pilots had kills to there credit.

Sock
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Oct 5th, 2003 at 10:44pm

Professor Brensec   Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Gender: male
Posts: 2955
*****
 
This Doco, although it is based around footage of a film commissioned by the USAAF in '44, has completely recent commentary and interviews. So none of the original info, that was part of the film, is not heard.

There is footage of the P47s engaing and shooting down, mainly what appear to be Fw190's. You dont see any 262's and the only Me109 I recall seeing in on the ground, desrtroyed.
Most of the 'gun camera' or 'cockpit' footage is of ground attacks on airfields, towns, vehicles, trains and unfortunately, quite a number of 'horse drawn' ammo wagons. (These poor horses). One pilot describes the road as being "Painted red with blood" after such an attack. Cry

Anyway, it would seem the 1 in 4 arrangement is a mystery. I personally feel that they were just evenly distirbuted among the flights, maybe because of their one shortcoming, the poor visibilty. Or maybe just a bit of 'uniformity'. I dunno.  Grin Wink

P.S. This is the Doco where I first heard of the method they used to 'kill' Tigers, by bouncing the .50 cal rounds off the road up underneath into the 'unarmoured' belly of the tank. One Pilot (Vet 'guest') describes this process in relative detail. It was apparently quite effective.  Grin Wink
 

...&&...&&http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Oct 5th, 2003 at 10:59pm

Professor Brensec   Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA

Gender: male
Posts: 2955
*****
 
Towards the end of the Doco, there is an account of the situation regarding the 100's of thousands of German soldiers that had to walk back to Germany when the War was over.
There is some footage of these often pathetic looking convoys of Germans walking down a road, with the odd American or Brit, who has no rifle pointed or at the ready, just over the shoulder etc.

The amazing thing, to me at least, is that there are clearly what appear to be SS Officers, in full garb, happily chatting to GI's, and laughing etc.

How could this have been? They are Waffen SS, who I'm led to believe were just fighting soldiers and not involved in the atrocities etc. (However, I have seen other Doco's that have poked a few holes in this 'fact').

Even so, after having liberated the Death camps, how could these GI's etc be so ready to just forget and treat the blokes as anything other than animals. Surely the 'very obvious' skull and cross bones on the cap would be enough for them to realise who and what these blokes were. Many of the Wermacht hated them and what they knew they had done.

Maybe I'm being too harsh. maybe I'm assuming that every GI and Brit and Frenchman etc was aware, and had seen first hand, the work of the people. Maybe it was known then that the Waffen SS were not involved in this stuff? I dunno. I just saw it as..........surprising.  Grin Wink

It is strange to see on a couple of occasions, a truck or car (loaed with, what appear to be relatively healthy Germans) go passed a legless or obvious badly wounded German, hoobling down the road.......................What a terrible time, when even the slightest degree of human decency seems to have gone out the window. Cry
 

...&&...&&http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print