Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
General
›
General Discussion
› Fighter guns - preference
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Poll
Question:
What would you prefer on your fighter?
6 x .50 cal MG
8 x .30 cal MG
2 x .50 cal & 2 x 20mm can
4 x .30 cal & 2 x 20mm can
4 x 20mm cannon
4 x cannon combo (as in Russian)
« Last Modified by:
Professor Brensec
on: Sep 26
th
, 2003 at 12:56pm »
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
Fighter guns - preference (Read 3089 times)
Reply #30 -
Sep 23
rd
, 2003 at 11:13am
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Quote:
I must say, they throw a hell of alot of rounds, but they would have been reasonably ineffective, compared to the .50's. But then damage is damage.
As I said earlier, the lack of an explosive round would have made them less effective indeed.
There was apparently a .30 cal explosive round introduced some time after BoB, but I'm not sure how much difference they made. (Maybe someone has some more specific info about this round).
I'm lead to understand that the pliots liked them more because they could see the little explosions on the enemy aircraft and this gave them the best indication that they were getting hits.
.
I'm convinced that a reliable cannon would have made a big difference to the RAF during the Battle of Britain. Many German aircraft limped home, full of .30 cal holes. Had those planes been hit by cannon fire, or even maybe .50 cal rounds, some if not all may have gone down.
The British did use the 20mm Hispano Cannon during the battle, fitted to a MkI Spitfire in place of all of it's .30 cal's. The drum fed cannon would jam up due to vibration problems and although a few German aircaft were shot down by the MkIb's, as they were called, the type was quickly withdrawn.
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Sep 23
rd
, 2003 at 2:45pm
ozzy72
Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville
Gender:
Posts: 37122
Lets face it Roger, the Hispano definately came under the chocolate oven glove list of toys........
Mark
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Sep 23
rd
, 2003 at 8:15pm
denishc
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 1018
In defence for the eight 30 cal. MGs, I once saw an interview with a German pilot about the Battle of Britian and he said that flying through the fire of a British fighter was like flying through a lead curtain.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Sep 23
rd
, 2003 at 10:58pm
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Sorry about the nationality error, Smoke, got confused, mate.
The Hurricane, as we know, was quickly assigned more to the 'intercept' role, while the Spit was your fighter, as such.
The Hurricanes that were assigned to bomber intercept, was that the 8 x .30 cal version or the 4 x 20 mm, or both?
I know that the Hurricane was responsible for more kills during the BoB than the Spit. Was this due to the increased numbers or the fact that more of the kills were bombers, or both.
It would be interesting to see some figures regarding the amount and type of planes shot down by Hurricanes and Spits and further, which variant of each plane (armament wise) was responsible for which kills etc.
It would be a very interesting table indeed. Can one of our brilliant researchers come up with something? I've had a quick look, but I'm on AOL time restriction till the end of my billing cycle (two more days) due to 'overuse' (Bastards!
).
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Sep 24
th
, 2003 at 2:39am
Smoke2much
Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,
Posts: 3879
I voted for the combo out of loyalty to the Hurricane, nothing more
.
I think it has a lot to do with the wall of lead principle, I was told once (and I have no evidence to back this up) that the Hurricanes wings flexed slightly during flight. This had the effect of spreading the pattern of bullets out and where the German fighters and Spitfire were highly accurate with the Hurricane if you got close enough you simply couldn't miss.
I feel a lot of it may well have to do with the armour situation discussed in another thread. During the BoB armour was not great on either side. One bullet in the pilot and in most situations you have a kill, he will either bail out or retire.
It would also be useful to tabulate claimed kills against recorded losses, this often shows a slight differance.
Have fun.
Will
Who switched the lights off? I can't see a thing....... Hold on, my eyes were closed. Oops, my bad...............&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Sep 24
th
, 2003 at 3:25pm
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Quote:
Sorry about the nationality error, Smoke, got confused, mate.
The Hurricane, as we know, was quickly assigned more to the 'intercept' role, while the Spit was your fighter, as such.
The Hurricanes that were assigned to bomber intercept, was that the 8 x .30 cal version or the 4 x 20 mm, or both?
I know that the Hurricane was responsible for more kills during the BoB than the Spit. Was this due to the increased numbers or the fact that more of the kills were bombers, or both.
It would be interesting to see some figures regarding the amount and type of planes shot down by Hurricanes and Spits and further, which variant of each plane (armament wise) was responsible for which kills etc.
It would be a very interesting table indeed. Can one of our brilliant researchers come up with something? I've had a quick look, but I'm on AOL time restriction till the end of my billing cycle (two more days) due to 'overuse' (Bastards!
).
The Hurricane far outnumbered the Spitfire at the start of the Battle of Britain. The Hurricanes of this time had the 8 x 30 cal armament.
Hurricanes accounted for about two thirds of the German aircraft lost during the battle with the Spitfire and other aircraft plus ground fire accounting for the rest.
Hurricanes were far easier to construct and easier to repair. They were very stable gun platforms and could out turn the main opponent, the BF-109 E.
People think that the Hurricane only took on the bombers but that is not true.
Fighter commands only VC was won by a Hurricane pilot.
I still firmly believe that the Spitfire was a far better fighter aircraft than the Hurricane, but the Hurricane won the Battle of Britain and so almost certainly saved England.
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Sep 25
th
, 2003 at 4:48am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
It seems where right back at the Spit Versus Hurri debate, aren't we Hawk.........
Ahh who cares!..........I agree completely with all your contentions about the Hurricane.
I didn't meant to infer that it was used 'soley' as an interceptor, but all indications are that it was used in that role more so, as time progressed and the Spit proved itself as the superior 'fighter'.
I am just interested in the reasons the Hurricane was delegated (not 'relegated') to that role? Was it the 4 x cannon? Or another reason other than the Spit''s were better as the Fighter rather than interceptor 'in the main'?
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Sep 25
th
, 2003 at 10:19am
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Quote:
It seems where right back at the Spit Versus Hurri debate, aren't we Hawk.........
Ahh who cares!..........I agree completely with all your contentions about the Hurricane.
I didn't meant to infer that it was used 'soley' as an interceptor, but all indications are that it was used in that role more so, as time progressed and the Spit proved itself as the superior 'fighter'.
I am just interested in the reasons the Hurricane was delegated (not 'relegated') to that role? Was it the 4 x cannon? Or another reason other than the Spit''s were better as the Fighter rather than interceptor 'in the main'?
Sorry if it came accross as if I was trying to correct what you said there Prof old pal
I just typed out a few facts about the BoB period Hurricane to try to answer some of your questions.
I think the Hurricane was more associated with bomber intercepts because there were just more of them around and it was more likely that the bombers would encounter the Hurricane.
The 4 x 20mm MkIIc version did not turn up until after the battle although I remember reading somewhere that the first victory scored by a cannon armed Hurricane was during the of the BoB. Whatever, they were not around in any numbers if at all.
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
Sep 25
th
, 2003 at 11:49am
denishc
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 1018
Now that the stats are posted let me say that I almost went with the 4 20mm cannon arrangement. A few strikes from a 20mm weapon could easily bring down most aircraft flown in WW2. But with a very limited number of rounds available to the pilot, he would have to be a good shot to make his rounds count. In the twisting, turning arena of air to air combat this must have been difficult.
So after thinking it over I selecting the 6 50 cal MGs, choosing rate of fire and firing time (i.e. the total number of rounds an aircraft could carry) over the punch provided of the 20mm round.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
Sep 25
th
, 2003 at 8:14pm
chomp_rock
Offline
Colonel
I must confess, I was
born at a very early
age.
Gender:
Posts: 2718
Well the poll is closed but I have to go with 8 .30s
. My favored tactic is getting really close in (where this config thrives) and "sawing" away with the storm of bullets (In CFS 1 2 and 3 of course)
. But I keep in mind this configs is useless at long range. And both the Spit and Hurri have there merits so quit with the comparing!
AMD Athlon 64 3700+&&GeForce FX5200 256Mb&&1GB DDR400 DC&&Seagate 500Gb SATA-300 HDD&&Windows XP Professional X64 Edition
&&&&That's right, I'm now using an AMD! I decided to give them another try and they kicked the pants off of my P4 3.4!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #40 -
Sep 25
th
, 2003 at 10:16pm
Loafing Smurf
Offline
Colonel
Push it!
Ottawa, Ontario (Canada)
Gender:
Posts: 1905
Did anybody hear about Metal Storm? Its going to fire 1 million rounds a miniute.
My online photo album&&
http://public.fotki.com/ranger21/&&&&Discover
your Smurf name today!&&
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mule/smurfgen.html&&&&
;
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #41 -
Sep 26
th
, 2003 at 2:12am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Quote:
Did anybody hear about Metal Storm? Its going to fire 1 million rounds a miniute.
What's that, mate?
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #42 -
Sep 26
th
, 2003 at 9:59am
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Quote:
And both the Spit and Hurri have there merits so quit with the comparing!
No one is comparing. We are having a discussion about
our
prefared fighter weapon choice. The Prof. asked a couple of questions about the role of the Hurricane during the Battle of Britain and I gave him a few answers. Not once did we compare the Spit to the Hurricane!
Quote:
What's that, mate?
Metal Storm is an electrically powered multi-barrel gun that fires all it's ammo in one big burst at very high speed. It can fire upto a million rounds per minute. Think that's right.
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #43 -
Sep 26
th
, 2003 at 12:06pm
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Quote:
No one is comparing. We are having a discussion about
our
prefared fighter weapon choice. The Prof. asked a couple of questions about the role of the Hurricane during the Battle of Britain and I gave him a few answers. Not once did we compare the Spit to the Hurricane!
Metal Storm is an electrically powered multi-barrel gun that fires all it's ammo in one big burst at very high speed. It can fire upto a million rounds per minute. Think that's right.
So it's a more elaborate version of the 'Minigun'.
Still just 6 barrels or more?
Where are they going to store ammo for a gun that will fire 1 million rounds per min.
I x .50 cal round projectile weighs 10.5 grams without the shell so we'll say approx 20 grams completete (I imagine being a minigun they'd just be in a 'bucket', so no belt or anything) but that equals around 20,000 kilograms per 1 million rounds - THAT"S 20 TONNES!
How the heel are they going to feed the bloody thing.
20 Tons per minute. That's ridiculous!
COMMENTS?
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #44 -
Sep 26
th
, 2003 at 12:13pm
Smoke2much
Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,
Posts: 3879
1 million rounds per minute equates to 16,660 rounds per second.
According to your calculations Prof that is 333333 grams per second, or 333 Kilograms. This I feel may be useful as a computer controlled point defence weapon where space fo ammo is no issue, otherwise it is a little pointless.
Does anyone know the cost of a single round?
Will
Who switched the lights off? I can't see a thing....... Hold on, my eyes were closed. Oops, my bad...............&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion ««
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.