Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
NFL WEEK 1 POOL (Read 591 times)
Sep 5th, 2003 at 8:35am

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
For those of you who don't know how football pools work, here's the easy version.

You pick the winners for the entire week's schedule.  Usually, a contribution is involved, and the winner gets the pot.  However, this is a friendly pool, and no money will be involved.  We're playing for pure bragging rights here.

Anyone interested needs to get their picks in (by replying to the week's post) by Friday night at midnight easterm time.  (Saturday morning, depending on how you view it.)  The exception to this is week 13, where there is a game on Thursday, November 27th.  That week, picks will be due on Wednesday.

Here's the week 1 schedule (a little late):

NY Jets @ Washington (Thursday)
Arizona @ Detroit
Denver@ Cincinatti
Indianapolis@ Cleveland
Minnesota @ Green Bay
San Diego @ Kansas City
Atlanta @ Dallas
New Orleans @ Seattle
Baltimore @ Pittsburgh
Houston @ Miami
Jacksonville @ Carolina
New England @ Buffalo
St Louis @ NY Giants
Chicago @ San Francisco
Oakland @ Tennessee
Tampa @ Philadelphia (Monday)

Reply with a list of your winners.  (And be honest about last nights game.  I still haven't seen the score, but I know that the team I picked was down in the 3rd quarter.)
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 8:36am

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
My picks for week 1 are:

NY Jets, Arizona, Denver, Indianapolis, Minnesota, San Diego, Dallas, New Orleans, Pittsburgh, Houston, Jacksonville, Buffalo, NY Giants, San Francisco, Oakland, and Tampa Bay.
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 8:41am

Smoke2much   Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,

Posts: 3879
*****
 
Manchester United 1 Liverpool FC 3
Norwich City 1 Ipswich Town 72

Hold on... Wrong sport... Sorry
 

Who switched the lights off?  I can't see a thing.......  Hold on, my eyes were closed.  Oops, my bad...............&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 8:41am

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
Arizona @ Detroit:   Arizona
Denver@ Cincinatti :   Denver:)
Indianapolis@ Cleveland:  Indianapolis
Minnesota @ Green Bay:  Green Bay
San Diego @ Kansas City:  Kansas
Atlanta @ Dallas: Atlanta
New Orleans @ Seattle: New orleans
Baltimore @ Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh
Houston @ Miami:  Miami
Jacksonville @ Carolina: Tie game 
New England @ Buffalo:  New England
St Louis @ NY Giants:  St Louis
Chicago @ San Francisco: San Fransisco
Oakland @ Tennessee:  Oakland
Tampa @ Philadelphia (Monday)  Tampa
i Know the result on last nights so i cant vote there:)
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 3:55pm

RichieB16   Offline
Colonel
January 27, 1967
Oregon

Gender: male
Posts: 4408
*****
 
OK, here we go:

Arizona @ Detroit-Detroit (Week 1 upset)
Denver@ Cincinatti-Denver
Indianapolis@ Cleveland-Cleveland
Minnesota @ Green Bay-Green Bay
San Diego @ Kansas City-San Diego
Atlanta @ Dallas-Dallas (because of no Vick)
New Orleans @ Seattle-Seattle
Baltimore @ Pittsburgh-Baltimore
Houston @ Miami-Maimi
Jacksonville @ Carolina-Jacksonville  Sad
New England @ Buffalo-New England
St Louis @ NY Giants-St. Louis
Chicago @ San Francisco-San Francisco
Oakland @ Tennessee-Tennessee (game of the week)
Tampa @ Philadelphia (Monday)-Tampa

OK, as far as Thursdays game went (I didn't see this pool before the game-so I didn't vote on that one) but I picked Washington to win because of the Jets lack of Chad Pennington.  I was rooting for the jets but unfortunately my fear was right as the offense couldn't get anything going.   Sad

Anyway, as far as the best remaining game this week-watch Oakland @ Tennessee (if it's televised).  This is gonna be the first key matchup this season and we may see them play again...in the AFC Championship.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 4:01pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
i have the fun of listening to all of denvers games on the online radio sadly sky sports only shows 2--3 games of theirs a year
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 4:07pm

RichieB16   Offline
Colonel
January 27, 1967
Oregon

Gender: male
Posts: 4408
*****
 
I know the feeling, I won't be able to watch more than 2 or 3 or Carolina's games (my favorite team) or of the Bears (my 2nd favorite team).  Fortunately, they televise just about every Lions game here (yes clear out in Oregon) so I will be able to see my favorite ACTIVE player-Joey Harrington.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 4:17pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
they say for every good theres a bad. i am guessing getting to watch the fav player is the good so having to watch a detroit game is the bad:)
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 4:22pm

RichieB16   Offline
Colonel
January 27, 1967
Oregon

Gender: male
Posts: 4408
*****
 
Actually, I think that Detroit is on the rise.  I mean, 2 years ago they won like 1 or 2 games.  The same was true of last year but about 5 of them had very close/last minute finishes.  In my opinion, Harrington (who I got to watch in person in college) has the tools and ability to become the next Joe Montana (who was my favorite player)-just watching him reminds me of Montana-same style of play.  If Charles Rogers pays off (Randy Moss comes to mind) this could be a very powerful offense, last year they really lacked a go to reciever.  Unfortunately, this year isn't gonna be real great because they lost James Stewart (starting RB) for the season during the preseason (yes-preseason is way to long) so they're going to depend on their passing game a lot more than they should.  Anyway, watch to see a lot of improvement out of Detriot this year.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 4:33pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
i do agree on preseason, i think it should be changed to one game and kept to the division, ie the winning team should play the third placed team and second take on 4th. that way it gives all teams more time to practise but gives them a good measuring stick for the year
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 6:19pm

RichieB16   Offline
Colonel
January 27, 1967
Oregon

Gender: male
Posts: 4408
*****
 
It seems like the length of the preseason is just too long (I mean it's like 5 weeks!).  Now, I do understand the neccessity of warming the veterans and giving the rookies first hand experience in an actual game environment-but because of the amount of violence in the sport, it gets to a point where the preseason become more damaging than helpful.  Names like Michael Vick and Chad Pennington come to mind (and thats just this year-every year at least one star gets seriously hurt).  I just think they need to shorten the preseason to maybe 3 weeks.  That should give adiquate time to get everybody all warmed up and will minimize the risk of losing a franchise player for the season before the season actually starts.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 6:22pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
another thing is the injured reserve rule, as i understand it once a player is on the IR list they are out a season, whether they heal up or not, some big names are kept from the game because of that,am i right on that rule?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 6:34pm

RichieB16   Offline
Colonel
January 27, 1967
Oregon

Gender: male
Posts: 4408
*****
 
The injury reserve rule is a little weird but there is a reason for it.  OK, an NFL team is allowed to have 53 players total and 45 of them active on a game day (so they have to have 8 inactive).  The injury reserve does not count for either of these lists so teams used to cheat and found a way to have a large roster by putting players they needed later down the road on the injury reserve.  This way they were able to use the injury reserve as a practice squad and have more than 53 players on their roster (they could then take a few off injury reserve and activate them and just adjust the lineup).  To help stop this cheating, the injury reserve was made into a season ending situation for a player who is placed on it.  That way, the teams couldn't use it as anther practice squad and then activate players later in the season.  This is why when an important player goes down they are not placed on injury reserve and are just put on the inactive list.

I hope that makes sense (I know it's a little confusing).
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 6:38pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
thanks for the info:)
never knew the reason behind it but now i do:) and it did make sense
Cheers
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Sep 5th, 2003 at 6:40pm

RichieB16   Offline
Colonel
January 27, 1967
Oregon

Gender: male
Posts: 4408
*****
 
Glad to help.

That took me a long time to figure out when I first learned about it.  It seems like one of those rules that they really shouldn't have had to make-but because of people trying to gain an upper hand they had to.
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print