I understand the 'early morning ramblings' mate...........lol

I can only agree with your suggestion that the Israelis (Jews) have a right. I have always considered that they have had their bums kicked from one side of the planet to the other, virtually since time began.
I've always had a great respect and felt a kind of affinity with the Jewish faith. Although their is only a very small Jewish community in Australia (compared with the US and Europe) and we don't normally interact with them. They do keep very much to themselves (which saddens me). Our histories, ideas and even celebrations and commemorations are the same or similar, simply with different names.
Having said that, this isn't really a religious or 'faith' based discussion or question, so no need to go further.

I see Pippin's point that the 'machines of war' didn't save those, in particular, who are commemorated. No, and they do, for the most part, represent war, fighting and killing etc.

But as I said in my earlier post, it's so natural for me, at least in this country, and I believe in many others, to see these items used as at least, a basis for memorials of many kinds.

I suppose it's one of those questions that has it's answer somewhere in both opinions.
As I and others have said, I think the main thing is the intention and thought behind the act that really counts. 

Personally, I get the impression from the article that this has more to do with the Polish/Jewish 'tensions or emotions' than it does with the actual Flyover. Which, as I said, is very difficult for me to understand, given what both 'groups' have endured 'together' in the past.