Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print
Where's the logic? (Read 720 times)
Aug 31st, 2003 at 9:12pm

Wing Nut   Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender: male
Posts: 14173
*****
 
So the state of Illinois has just passed a seat-belt law.  If you are caught without it, it's a $55.00 fine.  So where if the logic of passing a law requiring seat-belts and repealling the law requiring motorcycle helmets?  I've gone down on a bike before, and if not for a helmet, I would be a vegetable right now.  People make no sense... Angry
 

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Aug 31st, 2003 at 9:27pm

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
What I like is that Illinois JUST passed the seat belt law.  It's been law here in NY for probably close to 20 years!


Here's the logic, since you asked:


If you go down on a bike, you're down.  Chances are, you're only going to injure yourself.

If you lose control of your car, however, the seatbelt is the only thing keeping you behind the wheel, which is the only place you can be to regain control of your car.

Therefore, you (sans seatbelt) could potentially endanger the lives of others...

The defense rests.
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Aug 31st, 2003 at 9:44pm

RichieB16   Offline
Colonel
January 27, 1967
Oregon

Gender: male
Posts: 4408
*****
 
I thought there was a federal seatbelt law passed like six months ago.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Aug 31st, 2003 at 11:32pm

Sock   Offline
Colonel
Satan is cool.
Hudson, NY USA

Gender: male
Posts: 2098
*****
 
Quote:
If you go down on a bike, you're down.  Chances are, you're only going to injure yourself.

If you lose control of your car, however, the seatbelt is the only thing keeping you behind the wheel, which is the only place you can be to regain control of your car.

Therefore, you (sans seatbelt) could potentially endanger the lives of others...

The defense rests.


I think it's that you now have to wear a seat belt, but if your riding a cycle, you don't have to wear a helmet.  In a car you're protect, by law I guess, and not a motorcycle.  It just doesn't make sense to have one and not the other.  Am I right, or off by miles?   ???

Sock
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Aug 31st, 2003 at 11:42pm

Wing Nut   Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender: male
Posts: 14173
*****
 
Hyperion, what you wrote makes absolutely no sense at all.

If you go down on a bike and you're not wearing a helmet, chances are you are going to come out of it eating through a small plastic tube.  You will most likely be a vegetable.  My wife says at the hospital where she works, they have a nickname for morons who don't wear helmets.  "Organ Donors."  Plain and simple, if you ride and don't wear a helmet, you are far more likely to be injured worse than if you're in a car with no seat belt.

Anyone who gets on a bike with no helmet is an idiot.
 

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 12:01am

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
It makes perfect sense.  I agree that you'd have to be a moron to ride without one.  But the question was, what's the logic in not requiring helmets but requiring seat belts.

If you're knocked off your bike, you're toast.

If you lose control of your car, you could harm others. 


THAT is the logic behind the Illinois law.
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 12:49am
Oso   Ex Member

 
Well when a couple of States started calling for seatbelts on motorcycles I quit paying attention.

Yes, It has actually been considered.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 12:55am

Wing Nut   Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender: male
Posts: 14173
*****
 
I remember that!  Roll Eyes  The Rep. that suggested it almost got laughed out of the House! Smiley
 

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 1:24am

BFMF   Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender: male
Posts: 19820
*****
 
Quote:
I thought there was a federal seatbelt law passed like six months ago.


That's what I thought???

But I thought the law has been in effect for as long as I could remember, then there's that relatively 'new' "clickit or ticket" law which everyone think's is a new idea Roll Eyes
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 2:40am

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
Well in Britain we've had the seatbelt law for over 2 decades and its sound countless lives.
Anyone that rides a bike without a lid deserves everything they get, 'cos anyone that stupid shouldn't have been allowed in the gene pool! I always wear a lid and full leathers, gloves, and boots. No matter how hot. I can always take a shower, I can't grow a new limb!

Ozzy Roll Eyes
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 3:01am

Deputy   Offline
Colonel
Hillsboro, Oregon

Gender: male
Posts: 2090
*****
 
Yes, its federal law - $77 click-it-or-ticket here.
 

Bad boys, bad boys, whatcha gonna do? Whatcha gonna do when I come for you?&&&&Iustita Omnibus&&Justice for All&&&&Women are: attractive, single, mentally stable. Pick two.&&... &&Yes, we drive on the right-hand-side of the road. Yes, I parked on the left-hand-side of the road. Yes, I blocked traffic for a picture. &&&&&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 3:15am

BFMF   Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender: male
Posts: 19820
*****
 
There's a poster at the local grocery store which says:

Quote:
New Law! Everyone must be buckled up!

Click-it or ticket!

Effective July 31st


Why is this supposedly new? Seat belt laws have been in effect for decades
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 3:58am

packercolinl   Offline
Colonel
Any more laid back I'd
be asleep!

Posts: 1049
*****
 
Let's forget Politician's logic for a moment.

Without going into great detail I have been quite glad to have ALL the protection available to me on a couple of occasions. Didn't stop me from being hurt but it stopped me from being dead.

Besides,those of you that fly,do you prefer the auto style seat belts or the harness type? I know what I prefer! Smiley
 

White on White fly all night.&&&&Red on White you're alright.&&&&Red on Red you'll soon be dead.
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 4:08am

BFMF   Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender: male
Posts: 19820
*****
 
I've always have buckled up, but when I got my escort, it has one of those automatic seat belts, so when I'm in other vehicles I tend to forget to buckle up Roll Eyes
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 7:05am

Polynomial   Offline
Colonel
Health is merely the slowest
possible way to die.
Brisbane, Australia

Gender: male
Posts: 1951
*****
 
its simple in my state in Australia, u must wear a helmet and a seatbelt. . . . . .
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #15 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 7:55am

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Seat belts have been compulsory for over 20 years in the UK. The initial objections soon petered out. I no longer feel comfortable in a car without one. All cars must be fitted with approved belts for all seats. Crash helmets have been compulsory for motorcylists for even longer. I'm sure it was law when I got my first bike in 1959. Even if it was not illegal I wouldn't dream of riding a motorcycle without one.

The UK seat belt law now covers driver & all occupants including those in the rear seats. Children must have suitable seats with proper restraints.
I assumed that all cars in the US were fitted with seat belts these days. I remember having a hire car which had an automatic seat belt that strapped you in when you closed the door. I thought this was a brilliant idea. This was some years ago when on holiday. It was a big Oldsmobile I think -  ideal for touring. We called it the gas-guzzler. Wink
I haven't visited the US for some 10 years.
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 9:55am

Lethal.Ambition   Offline
Colonel
They call me John.
Florida

Gender: male
Posts: 1563
*****
 
I live in South Florida and we have had the seat belt law for ages! But now they want to enforce it and stop anyone without a seat belt.
 

Oderint Dum Metuant - Let them hate as long as they fear.&&Proud member of the =XE= Xtreme Eagles&&Oderint Dum Metuant&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #17 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 11:55am

Wing Nut   Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender: male
Posts: 14173
*****
 
I think the confusion may lie in the fact that while there has been a seat-belt law on the books for years, it has not been a stoppable offense.  The change now is that they can pull you over now if they see you're not wearing one.

That still does not really address the hypocrisy,  why one and not the other?

As long as we're at it; why do skydivers wear helmets?
 

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
IP Logged
 
Reply #18 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 12:14pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
That still does not really address the hypocrisy,  why one and not the other?

Well we all have our own way of doing things I guess. As I told you, crash helmets have been compulsory for motorcyclists in the UK for as long as I can remember. This is strictly enforced. The way I see it, there's no point in having a law if you don't enforce it. Roll Eyes

Quote:
As long as we're at it; why do skydivers wear helmets?

To protect their heads on the way in/out of the aircraft? Cheesy
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #19 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 2:14pm

BFMF   Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender: male
Posts: 19820
*****
 
Quote:
The change now is that they can pull you over now if they see you're not wearing one.


If you're driving down the highway at 60 mph and pass a cop on the side of the road, how can he tell if your buckled up?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #20 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 2:23pm

RichieB16   Offline
Colonel
January 27, 1967
Oregon

Gender: male
Posts: 4408
*****
 
One thing that bothers me is that some of the older cars (like the car I'm working on) only have lab belts-even in the front.  So, it looks like the driver isn't wearing a seatbelt from the outside of the car-since it can only be seen when someone looks directly into the interior.  I wonder if I'm gonna get pulled over (and then let go) because it looks like I'm not wearing a seatbelt.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #21 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 2:34pm

Lethal.Ambition   Offline
Colonel
They call me John.
Florida

Gender: male
Posts: 1563
*****
 
Andrew, passing a cop ( except when he is going very slow ) is like suicide.
 

Oderint Dum Metuant - Let them hate as long as they fear.&&Proud member of the =XE= Xtreme Eagles&&Oderint Dum Metuant&&
IP Logged
 
Reply #22 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 2:59pm

Fozzer   Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.

Posts: 24861
*****
 
If you are not wearing your seatbelt and you run into something solid, you immediately become a rocket-propelled grenade..... Shocked...!
Wearing seat-belts and motor-cycle crash safety helmets is mandateory over here... 8)...!
"Klunk-Klick, every trip"...!... 8)...!
...you know it makes sense... Wink...!

Paul.
(England).
 

Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
IP Logged
 
Reply #23 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 3:01pm

Wing Nut   Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender: male
Posts: 14173
*****
 
Hey Fozzer,  If it weren't the law, would you wear a helmet?
 

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
IP Logged
 
Reply #24 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 3:07pm

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
Agreed Fozzer, for those of you on the other side of The Pond who might doubt, or be complaining well think about this little piece of research my the British Motor Vehicle Safety chappies.
An average sized two year old in a car not wearing a belt in a head on collision at 30 mph has the same effect as a fully grown African bull elephant (something to do with physics!) when it hits the windscreen (or adult seated in-front of them).
My advice wear the belt, don't compain, and if the officer stops you, be polite and point out that you have enough brains to wear one! I'm sure the officer will be v.nice, I always found the CHiPs chappies v.polite, especially when they pulled my dad for speeding Grin Grin Grin

Mark Wink

PS. Kevin I would ALWAYS wear a lid and leathers, I was in Greece some 8 years ago and ended up in hospital with my head split open (windsurfing accident), and they brought in a German tourist who'd come off a moped wearing only shorts and flip-flops. I'm not squeamish, but I nearly puked. He died lying there on the bed next too me, there was just so much of his body missing, and he'd come off at about 20 mph. Most of his face was gone.... Sad I could see his ribs (the skin flailed off his chest. The right arm and leg looked like bits of meet hyenas had been chewing on for a few hours. Convinced me of safety first!
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #25 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 3:19pm

Fozzer   Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.

Posts: 24861
*****
 
Quote:
Hey Fozzer,  If it weren't the law, would you wear a helmet?


DEFINITELY...!
When I first started bikin' in the late 1940's all we had to wear were berets and cloth caps worn back-to-front with flying goggles to prevent them from blowing away in the super-sonic speed which we travelled in those far-off days... Roll Eyes....LOL...!
Due to thin plastic tyres, loose road gravel, and very little retardation in the braking department the accidents were numerous and the head injuries fatal... Cry...!
By the time of the mid '50's, proper, (fibreglass),  motorcycle helmets became available and it was cool to be seen wearing them, (although not compulsory 'till later on), on our cafe' racers... Grin...!
From then on it saved lots of heads, and lots of beds at the local hospital/morgue.... Wink...!
A modern motorcycle safety helmet is now a fashion statement as well as a head-saver... 8)...!

Cheers mate...
Paul....brmmm...brmmm...!
(England).
 

Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
IP Logged
 
Reply #26 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 3:30pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Reading this thread gives me a strange feeling of deja vu. I remember the same arguments & objections when seat belts were made compulsory in the UK.
Quote:
Manufacturers were forced by law to fix front belt anchorage points by 1965, and belts themselves had to be installed from the following year, nearly two decades before their use became compulsory.
Fortunately. common sense prevailed. A few stupid (IMHO) individuals still object to wearing them but they are in a small minority. The same applies to crash helmets for motorcycles. Sorry Foz, I still call them crash helmets. Tongue

I'm surprised to hear that anyone would think of using a lap-strap in a car. These would offer no protection at all & you might as well not bother. Our seat belts must comply with an international standard & comprise a lap-strap with a diagonal shoulder strap.

Richie. These are not compulsory for vintage cars over a certain age but any car can be fitted with an approved safety belt. This article gives the details & a brief history of seat belts in the UK.
http://www.quickfitsbs.co.uk/qsbs/2b.htm
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #27 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 3:36pm

Wing Nut   Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!

Gender: male
Posts: 14173
*****
 
Just to be clear, I have nothing against wearing seat belts.  I just think it's very hypocritical to require one and then repeal the other...
 

HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives

If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
IP Logged
 
Reply #28 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 3:46pm

Hagar   Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica

Posts: 33159
*****
 
Quote:
Just to be clear, I have nothing against wearing seat belts.  I just think it's very hypocritical to requie on and then repeal the other...

Pippin. I find this strange to say the least. You guys work to a different system than us. We have no regional variations for these things. Our laws cover the whole country & have to be introduced by Act of Parliament. I suppose this is similar to your Federal Law.

I wore a crash helmet or seat belt long before either was made compulsory. I wore them while on holiday in the US too. Surely it's a simple case of common sense. Roll Eyes
 

...

Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the Fox Four Group

Need help? Try Grumpy's Lair

My photo gallery
IP Logged
 
Reply #29 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 5:07pm

goball65   Offline
Colonel
Kitchener Ontario Canada

Gender: male
Posts: 103
*****
 
Seatbelt law in Florida is front seats only and they'll only stop you for an infraction other than not wearing seatbelts. At that time you will be no doubt charged if not wearing seatbelts.
However the rear seat passengers don't have to wear them.
Where's the rational there???
Make sure the rear passanger directly behind you is as light as a feather just in case you crash.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #30 - Sep 1st, 2003 at 5:16pm

Craig.   Offline
Colonel
Birmingham

Gender: male
Posts: 18590
*****
 
to be quite honest with you, i would wear a seatbelt even if it wasnt compulsory, like many of you have said its plain stupidity not to. i only wear lap belts in the middle seat of the back, they do provide protection, but be prepared for some seriously painful ribs and stomach problems if involved in an accident.
as for bikes, again i would make sure to wear a helmet and leathers, for the exact reason posted by ozzy, generally i dont like going out on a push bike without at least jeans and a sweater, and i have seen first hand what can happen, me and friend riding down hill going 30mph, as he went by me he hit a rock, and went flying, stripped his knees and arms of a good few layers of skin and he broke his wrist and dislocated his shoulder, had he not been wearing a helmet and trousers it would have been much worse.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #31 - Sep 2nd, 2003 at 8:58am

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
Well, I don't myself ride (always wanted to though!), but if I did, I would always wear a helmet.  It's for my own protection.

However, I do think that motorcyclists should be allowed to make that decision themselves.  As I said earlier, if they go down, they're not going to do any harm to anyone else.

This is different than a car.  If you're in a wreck, and not wearing your seatbelt, you run the risk of being knocked from behind the wheel.  This is the only place you can be and try to regain control of the vehicle, which, if out of control, is nothing more than a 3,000 pound weapon.

And to answer the one question posted above...here in New York, they can't stop you to do a seatbelt check, that would be a violation of the "probable cause" law.  However, if you're pulled over for ANYTHING, rest assured that they sweep their eyes around the "cabin" for seatbelt use.

Also periodically you'll see checkpoints.  They claim they're checking inspections and registrations, but they also often scan inside for seatbelts and now the dreaded cell phone.
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 
Send Topic Print