Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Simviation Site
›
Suggestions for these forums
› stars
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
4
stars (Read 4641 times)
Reply #30 -
Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 6:31am
Polynomial
Offline
Colonel
Health is merely the slowest
possible way to die.
Brisbane, Australia
Gender:
Posts: 1951
I think the current system is good although we do need more things for higher posters although i do not know what. Some of the suggested ideas are great so far.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 8:43am
Doug_A
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 60
Quote:
Just to play "Devil's Advocate", the number of stars displayed by someone responding to a particular subject, does hold weight(for me)on topics specific to SIMV. The reasons for this would be obvious. I don't think the system needs to be changed at all, but I wouldn't remove it altogether either Ken.
I've resurrected my old nickname to illustrate a point. On this basis you would take more notice of Hagar or Grumpy1 than me.
Most of the regulars know that we are one & the same person. When asking for help or advice, surely the content of the reply must mean more than the number af posts the author might have? I can usually tell if a person knows what they're talking about & couldn't care less how many stars they have. Anyone can give specific information about themselves in their avatar & signature if they wish to do so.
Like Andrew, Fozzer & a few others I was here long before this board (
Ultraboard
RIP) & helped Pete check it out on the first day. As Hagar I tend to spend more time in the sim & design forums where people come for help & advice. This was originally the intention of this forum. I've seen the occasional valuable contributions by developers I admire, experts in their field like Dave Eckert, Lee Swordy & Garry J. Smith. I've learned so much from guys like them but all have only one star in this forum. I suspect they & others like them would visit more often if it wasn't for this stupid obsession with number of postings & star ratings. This is one of the reasons for my objection to the whole idea. It's bad enough already, extending it can only make things worse. IMHO
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 11:24am
stormy
Offline
Colonel
BC Canada Vancouver Island
Gender:
Posts: 1615
I brought this Idea up only for change not "status"I beleive also , that its not the stars that tell who knows what INFO, and who doe's not know alot of info.. ..I also agree we get to know who ubderstands what in here by time and as we talk to different peoplenot by the stars they get..
I really am sorry that I brought this up..
[size=]"NOW EVERYONE PUT A LID ON IT AND LETS CARRY ON WITHOUT NEW STARS"
[/size]
«
Last Edit: Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 5:05pm by stormy
»
&&
Women Rule!!!!!!need I say more!!!!!!!
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 2:04pm
RichieB16
Offline
Colonel
January 27, 1967
Oregon
Gender:
Posts: 4408
I think that Doug_A (alias Hagar....alias Grumpy1-lol) has made an extremely good point. Sure, all these stars and whatnot are fun and intertaining...but what to they really mean, nothing. I think that sometimes people tend to listen more to people with 5 stars than those with 1 or 2. Doug made a great point here, but what one thing he didn't say bluntly, I'll say bluntly. Look at all us residents, we have 5 stars...yay-but do any of us make a more valuable contribution than someone with 2 stars (ya know, people like this "Doug_A" character with only 60 posts!
). OK, I do understand that these stars are fun to have and I suppose that we have "earned" them, but I don't think it is neccessary to make more "distance" between people with a lot of posts and people with few.
&&
Check Out My 1969 & 1996 Camaro's
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 5:24pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
Since this seems to be missed as a simple point, let me say this....
.........all that the stars signify is whether the member is a long running contributor(whether garbage or not in value isn't of mention) or whether the member is more of a spectator, and reads to his hearts content........end of story.......
.......nowhere, is anyone defined as being more valuable than anyone else, as in the end we all take what we want from the forums and we all submit what we want to contribute...........
personally, if I want more stars I will make my own avatar full of stars.......hmmmmmmmm
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 6:37pm
OTTOL
Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)
Gender:
Posts: 918
Just taking a moment to reflect........Let's seeeee......Resident.....Resident......Resident.......GoldMember+........Residen
t........Resident.........Resident.......Goldmember+.......Resident.......Reside
nt disguised as Gold member.....Resident.............I feel like a Private that just made a wrong turn into the General's War Room. For a bunch of people that proclaim that "rank is not a sign of tenure or intelligence" you sure seem to have ganged up on the "new guy"! Your point and delivery are well appreciated Doug, but that wasn't the only point I made.
Quote:
I don't think the system needs to be changed at all, but I wouldn't remove it altogether either Ken.
Quote:
In retrospect, I can see how this could create a problem with "badge collectors".
Quote:
I'm not comparing the "star system" to someone's tenure or background OR intelligence
Quote:
My suggestion was not a intended as a replacement or enhancement of the current system, but as a "on a similar note...." idea.
....were ALSO some of the points I made, that seem to have been skipped over. I think I'll stick to the Technical topics in the future. Pat
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 6:48pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Pat. I wasn't criticising or trying to pull rank. I quoted part of your reply to make my own point. I didn't think it necessary to quote the complete thing or comment on it. It's always surprised me just how seriously some people take this rank business, that's all.
I'm an old misery guts & never saw the point of changing anything simply for the sake of it. I have better things to think about than the number of stars anyone has or what colour they might be. I'm sure Pete has far more important stuff to worry him too.
These are simply my opinions & I don't expect too many people to agree with me. LOL
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 7:27pm
OTTOL
Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)
Gender:
Posts: 918
I agree, and the point you were making was perfectly illustrated(I didn't even regard the number of Stars(AT FIRST GLANCE)). Which, now as I type this really brings out another point. Most of the time I just read the text, and then if I find the response funny, or interesting, or questionable, I may sctutinize the author more closely. With the exception being Fozzer, I can always spot his handywork!
Ultimately going back to where I started, I never had any complaints about the existing system, and your probably right, efforts concentrated on more important items would be better spent. It took me two weeks to figure out how to change my Avitar, I can't even imagine what an undertaking it must be to maintain and modify this entire site!
Pat
«
Last Edit: Sep 9
th
, 2003 at 12:18am by OTTOL
»
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
Sep 8
th
, 2003 at 7:32pm
stormy
Offline
Colonel
BC Canada Vancouver Island
Gender:
Posts: 1615
Quote:
I suppose somewhere in the image folder there must be a gold star - I'd have to chaneg that.....
Any volunteers to create alternatives??
In reality - I know it's just you guys messing with ideas
Now how about turning some of that creative energy towards FS!!!!! 8)
NOW AS PETE WROTE ."In reality - I know it's just you guys messing with ideas". AND I AM SAYING THIS WAS ALL IN FUN, JUST TO SEE WHAT IDEAS EVERYONE WOULD COME UP WITH.. NO BODY WINS OR LOSES HERE FOLKS....
&&
Women Rule!!!!!!need I say more!!!!!!!
&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
Sep 9
th
, 2003 at 12:53am
OTTOL
Offline
Colonel
Fintas, Kuwait (OKBK)
Gender:
Posts: 918
Just as a side note, my recent change of Avatar does not coincide with this thread.
<<<<<<-------------------(((((
.....so I loaded up the plane and moved to Middle-EEEE..........OIL..that is......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #40 -
Oct 12
th
, 2003 at 12:47am
Scott_McCloud
Offline
Colonel
"First star on the Right,
and straight on til AM"
somewhere in Texas
Gender:
Posts: 218
Hey guys if you shoot peoples ideas down
they won't want to contribute. "Young minds new
ideas"
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #41 -
Oct 13
th
, 2003 at 11:54pm
Smoke2much
Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,
Posts: 3879
Quote:
Hey guys if you shoot peoples ideas down
they won't want to contribute. "Young minds new
ideas"
This whole thread is not about shooting down someones idea. It is a free and frank exchange of views. Some people think it is a great idea, others don't. All who have an opinion have posted it and we are all still friends. Why resurrect the thread and imply that residents are ganging up on newer members?
Will
Who switched the lights off? I can't see a thing....... Hold on, my eyes were closed. Oops, my bad...............&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #42 -
Oct 14
th
, 2003 at 2:50pm
Attack_Cabbage
Offline
Captain
Earth - I think!
Gender:
Posts: 3
Why oh why is this such an issue?
My view - the server simply logs the number of posts, for some other daft/stupid/logical (delete as applicable) reason.
I could'nt give a hoot how many stars a poster may have, theres more than a few in here who simply post for the sake of it - "it" being the number of posts....
If somebody wants to give me green stars animated images etc for posting then thats fine by me.
If on the other hand, I did'nt know how many posts I'd ever made, I doubt the experience of these forums would change for me at all.
All I've done today is use my Battlefield1942 "name".
Otherwise, there'd be a truck reference in this post somewhere of other............
Lifes a bitch, then you die - or marry one first!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #43 -
Oct 14
th
, 2003 at 3:26pm
Wing Nut
Offline
Colonel
Hoy-Hoy!
Gender:
Posts: 14173
Considering that, except for the last three postings, no one had touched this thread for almost a month; I wouldn't consider it an issue. It was a subject that came up, was debated, and eventually petered out. Why make a big deal of it now?
HP p7-1300w
AMD Athlon II X4 650 Quad-core 3.2 Ghz
23" HP Widescreen monitor/19" Dell monitor
Windows 7 Home Premium
16 Gb DDR3 PC10600 Ram
1 Gb GeForce GTX 550Ti video card
1 TB RAID Drives
If you want to see the most beautiful girl in the world, CLICK HERE!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #44 -
Oct 14
th
, 2003 at 4:46pm
4_Series_Scania
Offline
Colonel
He who laughs last, thinks
slowest.
Stoke on Trent England U.K.
Gender:
Posts: 3638
Quote:
Considering that, except for the last three postings, no one had touched this thread for almost a month; I wouldn't consider it an issue. It was a subject that came up, was debated, and eventually petered out. Why make a big deal of it now?
Simple Pippin.
Some of us are not on-line at home etc etc and thus, may only get patchy internet access.
I'm in this camp. I only visit here when I'm at a friends house or using a pc at work.
I work away from home most of the time and some weekends I won't go near a PC and thus no where near the net or SimV for upto months at a time, depending where in the U.K. or europe I may be....
Thus, if I see a topic that interests me (and it may be months old) I'll add to it, ok, it may get bumped up the board temporarily, but, if indeed it's already old and petered out I'm sure it'll die down again. This thread is the biggest on the page at the moment (42 posts I think) - hardly surprising, somebody like me comes along after some period of absence and reads, then replys to the hottest thread!
This forum to my knowledge has'nt got any rules on replying to old posts, and it would be rather sad if it did IMHO.
Or am I just wrong ???
Posting drivel here since Jan 31st, 2002. - That long!
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
4
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums ««
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.