Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Poll closed Poll
Question: Subject
*** This poll has now closed ***


Yes    
  1 (25.0%)
No    
  3 (75.0%)




Total votes: 4
« Created by: Damanwithaproblem on: Jul 23rd, 2003 at 2:54pm »

Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
Is 128 RAM enough? (Read 471 times)
Reply #15 - Jul 23rd, 2003 at 9:16pm

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
I do wish M$ and Lomac would team up to put Lomac quality graphics in an ATP program...lol
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #16 - Jul 24th, 2003 at 6:29am

hiflyphil   Offline
Colonel
Is that UFO bugging me
again.
England

Gender: male
Posts: 132
*****
 
Grin
HI

there are two theories
1) its never enough we alway need more, more, more.  I have 400 Mb and it stills clocks a 1 frame per second when I'm on the ground. But maybe thats the processor not the memory.

2) if the box says minimum 64 Mb then it must be enough surely?  But then what OS are you using, Xp, ME, 2000, 98 - they all demand different levels of free memory, and the more you stick in the more the OS will hog for itself.

One thing is for sure are computers will never keep up with these demanding applications.

Happy simming

Phil
Cheesy
 

Tower : Flight 2-0-9er, you're cleared for take off.&&Oever : Roger!&&Murdock : Huh?&&Tower : L.A. departure frequency 1-2-3 point 9er.&&Oever : Roger!&&Murdock : Huh?&&: Re-quest Vector, over!&&Oever : What?&&Tower : 2-0-9er clear for vector 2-3-4.&&Murdock : We have clearance Clarence.&&Oever : Roger, Roger. What's our Vector Victor?&&Oever : That's Clarence Oever! Oever.
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print