Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Old Flight Simulator Series
›
FS 2002
› Flaps and Lift argument
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
3
4
Flaps and Lift argument (Read 1079 times)
Reply #30 -
Jul 12
th
, 2003 at 7:08pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
Right you are Hagar.....I'll call it a draw and let the dust settle as everyone else lets this soak in.......not everyone can understand the basic principles that birds use to fly..........Damn birds, don't even have an inkling of what scientific stuff they are dealing with.....they just fly !
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Jul 12
th
, 2003 at 7:27pm
Iroquois
Offline
Colonel
Happy Halloween
Ontario Canada
Gender:
Posts: 3244
I should add that anywhere from 15-20 degrees, flaps produce enough lift to counteract drag, causing the plane to rise up with less speed. Above 20 degrees, this counteracting effect is defeated. The flaps begin to function more like spoilers because they cause more drag than lift.
Sorry if this has already been said but I don't have the attention span to read all the posts.
Anyway, It is commonly thought that a plane flys by producing higher pressure underneath the wing than on top. This is part of it but areodynamics works more on the basis of Newtons basic laws of motion. That being that every action has an equal and opposite reaction. This law is used to explane how wing shapes other than flat-bottom fly. Most airplanes, other than trainers use a semi-symetrical wing or a fully symetrical wing.
How flaps work is the air rushing past the underside of the wing is forced downward. This inturn, according to Newton's law, forces the entire wing upward. Once again, flaps are only useful at certain speeds before drag takes over. Once the certain speed is reached, flaps become useless except as spoilers.
I only pretend to know what I'm talking about. Heck, that's what lawyers, car mechanics, and IT professionals do everyday.
&&The Rig: &&AMD Athlon XP2000+ Palomino, ECS K7S5A 3.1, 1GB PC2700 DDR, Geforce FX5200 128mb, SB Live Platinum, 16xDVD, 16x10x40x CDRW, 40/60gb 7200rpm HDD, 325w Power, Windows XP Home SP1, Directx 9.0c with 66.81 Beta gfx drivers
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Jul 12
th
, 2003 at 7:35pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
Quote:
Once again, flaps are only useful at certain speeds before drag takes over. Once the certain speed is reached, flaps become useless except as spoilers.
This is essentially correct, but flaps never spoil lift.....that occurs on the upper surface of the wing as the airflow becomes turbulent due to some intrusion into the airflow (spoilers) or the critical angle of attack being exceeded and flow separation occurs........this increase in high drag may overpower the ability of the wing to support its load, but the flaps are not "spoiling the lift".....the flaps, themself, are sort of "after the fact" of the wings ability to generate lift.......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 1:38am
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I should add that anywhere from 15-20 degrees, flaps produce enough lift to counteract drag, causing the plane to rise up with less speed. Above 20 degrees, this counteracting effect is defeated. The flaps begin to function more like spoilers because they cause more drag than lift.
According to the Cranfield College of Aeronautics who spend all their time studying this stuff it's more like 40 - 45 degrees. I'm not in a position to argue.
http://www.rmcs.cranfield.ac.uk/aeroxtra/e348wingdespflap.htm
Quote:
Once again, flaps are only useful at certain speeds before drag takes over. Once the certain speed is reached, flaps become useless except as spoilers.
As Rifleman points out, they would then be acting as airbrakes, not spoilers.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 2:31am
packercolinl
Offline
Colonel
Any more laid back I'd
be asleep!
Posts: 1049
Now you've done it! I'm going to have to go and read all that stuff now
White on White fly all night.&&&&Red on White you're alright.&&&&Red on Red you'll soon be dead.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 2:05pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
Quote:
I should add that anywhere from 15-20 degrees, flaps produce enough lift to counteract drag, causing the plane to rise up with less speed.
Orenda, not to be pickin, but lift and drag never counteract each other.......they are not opposing force on the basic chart.......they can have a combination effect, but never work in opposition........remember this chart ?...
Quote:
The airplane in straight-and-level unaccelerated flight is acted on by four forces--lift, the upward acting force; weight, or gravity, the downward acting force; thrust, the forward acting force; and drag, the backward acting, or retarding force of wind resistance.
Lift opposes gravity.
Thrust opposes drag.
Drag and weight are forces inherent in anything lifted from the earth and moved through the air. Thrust and lift are artificially created forces used to overcome the forces of nature and enable an airplane to fly. The engine and propeller combination is designed to produce thrust to overcome drag. The wing is designed to produce lift to overcome the weight (or gravity).
In straight-and-level, unaccelerated flight, (Straight-and-level flight is coordinated flight at a constant altitude and heading) lift equals weight and thrust equals drag, though lift and weight will not equal thrust and drag. Any inequality between lift and weight will result in the airplane entering a climb or descent. Any inequality between thrust and drag while maintaining straight-and-level flight will result in acceleration or deceleration until the two forces become balanced.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 3:20pm
hikariken
Offline
Colonel
I wich I could be a bird
Posts: 108
Quote:
. The delta wing is particularly stable at low airspeeds & impossible to stall.
[/url]
I will just correct this point. A delta wing is the most intable type of wing at low speed!!!
If you need proof I wil tell you to look why the deltadaggers has been retired from the navy after only 7 month of operation. delta wing is the only one form of wing that permit mach1 and 2. so it is an obligation for concorde and now most of military aircraft. but those aircraft got high approch speed. the F4 phantomII was a very difficult plane at cat launch and for carrier approch. and today it is always difficult for delta wing pilot. at last concorde was the plan with the highert take off and landing speed
If dumb could fly, sky will be green (french air force proverbs)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 3:53pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
I'm not sure of what it is you are trying to say Hakariken, but it is possible to stall a delta............it only takes a much higher angle of attack in order to do so....power balance at low speeds is absolutely critical to prevent too much drag from overcoming airspeed and hence lift.........this is inherent in deltas, that they need a high angle of attack to enable the low speed regime of flight.......if has to do partly, with aspect ratio....a delta is usually very low, compared to a glider, which has a very high aspect ratio......(aspect ratio=wingspan to chord relationship)
As far as a delta being the only planform of wing to enable supersonic flight........look again.....from the very beginning, the Bell X-1 was a straight winged bird and it exceeded the sound barrier.........there have been many more since, which don't have a delta wing, although its much more preferable to utilize a swept wing over a straight wing......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 3:56pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
this could go on all night
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 3:59pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Quote:
I will just correct this point. A delta wing is the most intable type of wing at low speed!!!
If you need proof I wil tell you to look why the deltadaggers has been retired from the navy after only 7 month of operation. delta wing is the only one form of wing that permit mach1 and 2. so it is an obligation for concorde and now most of military aircraft. but those aircraft got high approch speed. the F4 phantomII was a very difficult plane at cat launch and for carrier approch. and today it is always difficult for delta wing pilot. at last concorde was the plan with the highert take off and landing speed
I was referring to the classic delta wing used by the Vulcan & Concorde. The Vulcan was never supersonic. A true delta wing will not stall in the normal sense at low speed but mush without dropping a wing or losing a great deal of height. Having flown several delta-winged RC models I can confirm this. The F-4 Phantom II has separate horizontal tail surfaces & is not a conventional delta. I can't speak for the Delta Dagger as I have no knowledge of it or why it was unsuccessful.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #40 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 4:35pm
Iroquois
Offline
Colonel
Happy Halloween
Ontario Canada
Gender:
Posts: 3244
Quote:
Orenda, not to be pickin, but lift and drag never counteract each other.......they are not opposing force on the basic chart.......they can have a combination effect, but never work in opposition........remember this chart ?...
[img]
I worded it really badly. I ment gravity. I'm sure you guys aren't that stupid to not know what I ment.
On the subject of 15-20 degrees. I read this in a British model aviation magazine on flap setup for computer radios. It came with a fancy chart showing that 15-20 degree flaps produced peak lift. Anywhere above that angle, the plane will begin to show and therefore sink. My scanner isn't working due to problems with my SCSI card so try to imagine the chart. The X-Axis represents flap angle and the Y-Axis represents lift. The chart is skewed such that it shows peak lift at 15 degrees. I should note that although the airplane is much smaller than real ones, the physical principles remain the same. 20 degrees is generally accepted for props while 15-25 is generally accepted for jets, note the guages in FS for proof.
I only pretend to know what I'm talking about. Heck, that's what lawyers, car mechanics, and IT professionals do everyday.
&&The Rig: &&AMD Athlon XP2000+ Palomino, ECS K7S5A 3.1, 1GB PC2700 DDR, Geforce FX5200 128mb, SB Live Platinum, 16xDVD, 16x10x40x CDRW, 40/60gb 7200rpm HDD, 325w Power, Windows XP Home SP1, Directx 9.0c with 66.81 Beta gfx drivers
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #41 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 4:49pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
Quote:
I can't speak for the Delta Dagger as I have no knowledge of it or why it was unsuccessful.
The Delta Dagger (F-102) was supposed to be a super-sonic interceptor, but was encumbered by high drag and not quite enough power (barely able to attain Mach 1) I was never aware of any (much less 7 months of operations) US Naval applications of this fighter.......when it was re-designed with the area rule of drag for fuselage cross section being applied, it came out as the F-106 Delta Dart and quickly became the formidable Mach 2 interceptor it was initally intended to be.......
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #42 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 5:07pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
Quote:
I worded it really badly. I ment gravity. I'm sure you guys aren't that stupid to not know what I ment.
Careful now.......if you are inferring that we should have the ability to read your mind when you say one thing and mean another, thats a job for Kreskin......but then even if some of us could do that, we may not like short stories..........
As far as the numbers which you quote from that chart, they are specifics and would be subject to variations in Chord, Thickness, and actual airfoil profile........the fact is, that
any
intrusion into the slipstream of a "clean" wing, is going to introduce drag, which will inevitably slow, but not necessarily increase sink, unless power is reduced and airspeed diminishes, and the zero-lift angle of that particular airfoil is exceeded...........once this occurs, the nose of the airfoil drops, speed increases until the drag matches the input thrust ( descent rate due to gravity) and you can acheive balanced flight once again, but in a descending flight path..........excessive deployment of flap will at some point, introduce more drag than lift and its at this point, that the power requirements are raised to avoid slowing the flight to the point of loss of control surface effectiveness immediately followed by a stalled flying surface..........loss of altitude is imminent........ 8) 8)
«
Last Edit: Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 7:08pm by Rifleman
»
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #43 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 6:54pm
Lethal.Ambition
Offline
Colonel
They call me John.
Florida
Gender:
Posts: 1563
WOW, you guys know so much
Oderint Dum Metuant - Let them hate as long as they fear.&&Proud member of the
=XE= Xtreme Eagles
&&Oderint Dum Metuant&&
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #44 -
Jul 13
th
, 2003 at 7:17pm
Hagar
Offline
Colonel
My Spitfire Girl
Costa Geriatrica
Posts: 33159
Well AstroGeek, there's plenty here who know far more than me. I've been fascinated with flight since the age of 6 & been flying models of one type or another ever since. What with that & working in the aircraft industry for 40 years something is bound to stick. My memory is failing & I've forgotten more than I can remember now.
I should have learned by now to keep out of these technical discussions. When I see someone say something I know is wrong I just can't help myself.
Founder & Sole Member - Grumpy's Over the Hill Club for Veteran Virtual Aviators
Member of the
Fox Four Group
Need help? Try
Grumpy's Lair
My photo gallery
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
3
4
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002 ««
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.