Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print
How do commercial airliners navigate? (Read 473 times)
Jul 8th, 2003 at 8:07pm

Big_Al   Offline
Colonel
Wishing i had good eyesight
to fly...

Posts: 300
*****
 
Question:

I enjoy flying the default 737. Lets say I was a real American airline flying this plane from airport to airport.

How would I navigate it to its destination? Would I switch on the autopilot after submitting my IFR flight plan and just do as the ATC said?

Or do the real pilots use the nav radios to point the airplane to the next nav beacon?

I'm interesting because I always want to do exactly what they do in real life... or at least try.

Any help would be appreciated. Plus if you can point me to a website which explains how to do the correct navigation that would be excellent!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jul 8th, 2003 at 11:18pm

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
Most commercial airliners use the Flight Management Computer.  The pilot inputs the waypoints, and presses "Execute", and the plane does the rest.  Unfortunately, I have yet to find a downloadable plane that has this amazing feature.  (Though I did have a payware add on for 98 that had it...) 

Maybe someone else knows of an aircraft or utility that will do that for us...
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jul 8th, 2003 at 11:47pm

fisharno   Offline
Colonel
Your basic Forum Rat
Reno, Nv

Gender: male
Posts: 626
*****
 
Maybe.
But, the pilots still have to follow, and sometimes deviate from their filed flight plan. The pilots are still responsible for executing any instructions from ATC, and they still have to monitor the navigational and communication equipment, and make any adjustment necessary.

If the flight has to be diverted or put in holding, someone has to be there to manually take over until frequencies can be changed, and plates can be read and comms between the pilot and ATC can be exchanged.

I guarantee you. Those guys have 100% of their attention on that aircraft. And no matter what engineering masterpiece is working the controls, they still "fly the plane".
Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 1:42am

Heber98   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 64
*****
 
To answer in a more general way, from what I understand entering the waypoints into the FMC is much like creating a flightplan with the default FS planner and flying the GPS route. Usually this route will be based on high altitude airways although sometimes it can be a direct route. I think the autopilot is slaved to the FMC, the pilot isn't actually flying the VOR radials that define the airways. Most pilots say they fly manual until they get to cruise then hit the buttons and go back to manual for descent and touchdown. At busy airports there are departure procedures to send all departing flights in a uniform fashion and arrival procedures to merge flights into a line and then they receive ATC vectors for the runway. (DP and STARs)
It's difficult if not impossible to make STARs work in a default IFR flightplan in FS. The ATC will always start vectors at least 50 nm out, so you would not get to really fly the arrival precedure. Plus they would get on to you if you descended and then tried to re-contact them when you were close, they would say to climb back to your filed cruise altitude and if you didn't they would cancel your plan. I think the FS2004 will be better at this.
Did I miss anything?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 2:33am

Big_Al   Offline
Colonel
Wishing i had good eyesight
to fly...

Posts: 300
*****
 
thanks for the replies. So what setting for the flight plan should I use? VOR or High Altitude?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 2:51am

Heber98   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 64
*****
 
It really doesn't matter. GPS direct routes are coming into the picture these days, but I think currently airlines pretty much stick to the High Altitude airways which will create a flightplan utilizing a mix of VORs and Intersections as waypoints, the FMC will incorporate GPS fixes as waypoints. Sometimes you have to add or delete a VOR waypoint to suit your departure or arrival, depends on what you like. On the FS cockpit panels there is a NAV/GPS switch and when it is on GPS then the autopilot will follow the flightplan (you have to enable NAV or VOR hold).
I like to actually see what VOR radials define the airways and track the radials while checking my progress with the GPS, but I'm most certain this is not done by airline pilots.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 2:56am

Big_Al   Offline
Colonel
Wishing i had good eyesight
to fly...

Posts: 300
*****
 
thanks again for the reply...

so now how do i input the VORs into the aircraft?

I create a flight plan using high altitude airways, now what do I have to do to get the airplane to go there without using the GPS to guide it? I'm guessing I use the nav radios, but how do I get each number for each intersection?
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 3:35am

Heber98   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 64
*****
 
It sounds like you are asking basic VOR navigation. I guess you don't want to fly like the real airlines! only kidding. This is what I do:
-File the plan and look at the heading to each waypoint
-If I'm flying to a VOR, I track the radial that is the reciprical of the heading in the planner. (ie, hdg170, track radial 350 to the VOR)
-If I'm flying to an intersection, I track the radial AWAY from the VOR I just left (ie the radial and planner heading will match)
- If there are more than one intersection in a row it can get tricky, but usually they can just be ignored and used as a method of determining progress.

The VOR frequencies are under the map view (world menu). Intersections do not have frequencies, they are an imaginary point in space where two radials from two different VORs intersect. I find them difficult to locate on the airliners because you have to use both NAV radios, and the NAV2 on airliners is just a pointer. It doesn't really tell you if you are on a radial.

Did I confuse you? You can learn here:
http://www.navfltsm.addr.com/vor-nav.htm
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 8:26am

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
Quote:
I guarantee you. Those guys have 100% of their attention on that aircraft. And no matter what engineering masterpiece is working the controls, they still "fly the plane".
Wink


Having been in the pit on many commercial airliners during flight ranging from the DC-9 to the 777, I assure you that I in no way meant to imply that the flight crew is useless.  In fact, quite the opposite.

However, there's an old joke among  pilots about the future of the commercial pilot.  It goes something like this:

In the future, the only things in the pit will be a pilot and a dog.  The pilot is there to make sure nothing goes wrong, and the dog is there to bite him if he touches anything.
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 11:57am

fisharno   Offline
Colonel
Your basic Forum Rat
Reno, Nv

Gender: male
Posts: 626
*****
 
Absolutely. I know what you meant.  Wink

I've met and talked to a few commercial pilots, and have known a few Air Force C-5 drivers, and they all seem to have the same view of they're roles as pilots. Flying the plane isn't exactly the same as piloting the plane, to them.
Piloting the plane involves all their technical training and expertise to do they're jobs.
Flying the plane is like driving the family station wagon. Period.

God love 'em!  Grin

Quote:
In the future, the only things in the pit will be a pilot and a dog.  The pilot is there to make sure nothing goes wrong, and the dog is there to bite him if he touches anything.


That's a good one!


 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 12:40pm

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
Quote:
Flying the plane isn't exactly the same as piloting the plane...


VERY well said...
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 3:12pm

hikariken   Offline
Colonel
I wich I could be a bird

Posts: 108
*****
 
yes now most aircraft got a nav computer but as say my father who is pilot on A340 Fly with nav computer is not fly
 

If dumb could fly, sky will be green (french air force proverbs)
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 3:45pm

Scottler   Offline
Colonel
Albany, New York USA

Gender: male
Posts: 5989
*****
 
Hikariken-

I'm getting ready to begin my real world flight school (next week), and I can choose between the Cessna 152, 172, and 172SP...can you ask your father which he thinks would be best to learn on?  Thanks!
 

Great edit, Bob.&&&&&&Google it. &&&&www.google.com
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 3:59pm

Oz   Offline
Colonel

Gender: male
Posts: 896
*****
 
Quote:
Most commercial airliners use the Flight Management Computer.  The pilot inputs the waypoints, and presses "Execute", and the plane does the rest.  Unfortunately, I have yet to find a downloadable plane that has this amazing feature.  (Though I did have a payware add on for 98 that had it...)  

Maybe someone else knows of an aircraft or utility that will do that for us...


Guess what i found in my FS2002 Gauges folder. Thats right, an FMC for the 777. Probably got it from one of the add-ons ive downloaded over time.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Jul 9th, 2003 at 4:00pm

hikariken   Offline
Colonel
I wich I could be a bird

Posts: 108
*****
 
hyperion

My dad think that the 152 is better for begginer. the 172 is too big
 

If dumb could fly, sky will be green (french air force proverbs)
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 
Send Topic Print