Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print
P51D problem (Read 6217 times)
Jul 4th, 2003 at 2:22am

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
Right, a lot of people keep posting about the problems with the handling of the P51D Mustang. The problem is this IT IS A LONG RANGE FIGHTER!!!!! Roll Eyes
So it has an extra fuel tank tucked in behind the pilot (scary but true, these guys really did fly them like this, and my hat is off to anyone that did fly them). So if you want Spitfire type dogfighting capabilities, set your fuel level to 40% and that should eliminate the nasty stall characteristics due to the changed CoG.
If you are flying escort missions however, you'll want every last drop of that precious fuel (and this is what the Mustang was for...).
Remember the Mustang had range that no other fighter could really match, the Spitfire was without a doubt the best short range fighter ever made, but the Mustang could go all the way to Germany and back.
Both fabulous aircraft, but comparing them is like comparing a Land Rover and a Ferrari, both are marvelous in their specific enviroment, but chalk and cheese otherwise inspite of their having wings and a single engine apiece.

Ozzy
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - Jul 4th, 2003 at 6:15am
Brad60012   Guest

 
Darn straight!
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - Jul 4th, 2003 at 6:21am

Whitey   Offline
Colonel
Scotland

Gender: male
Posts: 2697
*****
 
Give it to us straight, Ozzy. Wink Smiley
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - Jul 4th, 2003 at 6:28am

Smoke2much   Offline
Colonel
The Unrepentant Heretic
Sittingbourne, Kent,

Posts: 3879
*****
 
I met a P-51 pilot three days ago.  He told me that even with the fuel tanks full it was a fantastic fighter.

It had cockpit heating so he could fly in shirtsleeves at 21000 feet.  The thing was so well balanced that if correctly trimmed you could sit back and smoke a cigarette while it flew itself.  I asked him if this was safe because of the fuel tank layout and he replied "No-one ever complained after one blew up." and shrugged LOL.

I told him about the flight simulator and the difficulty in fighting on full fuel and it was his opinion that the simulators had it wrong and you could fight. 

In the sim you need to do as ozzy says.

Will
 

Who switched the lights off?  I can't see a thing.......  Hold on, my eyes were closed.  Oops, my bad...............&&...
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - Jul 4th, 2003 at 6:47am
Brad60012   Guest

 
I don't think ozzy was saying you couldn't fight in it. Only that you can't expect to turn like a spit in it, which is more or less true at 5000 feet fully loaded.
  Course, on the other wing, I don't put to much stock in microsofts rendition of flight models either. I think they've been simplified for use by the genneral public more than anything else.
   At any rate, if your starting off in quick combat with full tanks, your not gonna get the combat performance that the accual pilots remembered probably, as they ussualy burned up some fuel before rondevous with bombers, much less most combat.  Banking and yanking most anything with full tanks is gonna lead to a potential for stalling.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - Jul 4th, 2003 at 11:47am

mcsquared   Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!

Posts: 52
*****
 
I found the best way to handle the P-51D problem is to substitute the AV History 1% airfile for the stock one, then delete all of the stock cfg file after the first paragraph from "editable" on down.  Copy the 1% cfg file FROM the second paragraph to the end.  Paste it in the stock cfg file right below the model number.  You probably won't be able to use this aircraft on the "zone" however. Wink
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - Jul 4th, 2003 at 6:02pm

Woodlouse2002   Offline
Colonel
I like jam.
Cornwall, England

Gender: male
Posts: 12574
*****
 
I find 30% fuel gives you optimum performance actually. Tongue

Also, shouldn't this be in the CFS FAQ forum? After all thats what its their for. IS THERE A MODERATOR IN THE BUILDING? Grin
 

Woodlouse2002 PITA and BAR!!!!!!!!&&&&Our Sovereign Lord the King chargeth and commandeth all persons, being assembled, immediately to disperse themselves, and peaceably to depart to their habitations, or to their lawful business, upon the pains contained in the Act made in the first year of King George the First for preventing tumults and riotous assemblies. God Save the King.&&&&Viva la revolution!
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - Jul 5th, 2003 at 6:39am

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
Ha ha ha Woodie. Actually I just put it here as this question keeps coming up and Scorpion and I had a chat about it. So I think it should stay here, as this is where everyone seems to look for CFS3 stuff.
Normally I'd have popped it in FAQ but...... errr.... ummm.
And I can't think of a decent excuse Tongue

Ozzy 8)
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #8 - Jul 7th, 2003 at 2:31pm

codered   Offline
Colonel
Flight Plan Closed?

Posts: 1622
*****
 
Thank you Ozzy.  I couldn't agree more.
 

Windows XP SP1&&Motherboard: Epox 8RDA + main board&&Processor: AMD XP2500 Barton CPU&&Memory: PC2700 1gb Geil DDR&&Hard Drive: SEA HDD IDE 40GB 7M 40GPP&&Hard Drive: Western Digital 40gb 8mb cache&&Monitor 15 LCD Flat Panel Display (15 viewable)&&Video Card: ATI Radeon 9500 Pro&&Sound Card: Creative Labs Audigy 2
IP Logged
 
Reply #9 - Jul 12th, 2003 at 3:18pm

Crumbso   Offline
Ground Hog

Posts:
*
 
From talking to people who have flown spit, hurris and mustangs it is in my opinion that they always wax lyrical about how their aircraft was the best and had the best handling.

I reckon that what ozzy's first comment say's is most prabably accurate and that they were all great in their own way.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #10 - Jul 15th, 2003 at 9:41am

pliabos   Offline
Colonel
turkey

Gender: male
Posts: 15
*****
 
ilginc, sasırdım valla ilk defa gördüm ....
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #11 - Jul 16th, 2003 at 12:51am
Josh Johnson   Guest

 
I agree with Ozzy. Also, I met a P-51 Pilot a couple months ago, I asked him if it had any handling problems, he said,"heck no, best plane I've ever flown!"
So there u have it.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #12 - Jul 16th, 2003 at 1:10pm

Crumbso   Offline
Ground Hog

Posts:
*
 
I have the proof. In the program of flying legends there was a pilot interviewed who said that when the p-51 was in a heavt fuel configuration it was not terribly responsive and not one of the nicest planes to fly and also it apparantly suffers from pitch control reversal if pushed to hard with heavy fuel load so you have to push down in a turn  Shocked Proves all fighters have their problems.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #13 - Jul 16th, 2003 at 3:51pm

ozzy72   Offline
Global Moderator
Pretty scary huh?
Madsville

Gender: male
Posts: 37122
*****
 
They certainly do if you convert them into a flying fuel tank! However for personal preference I'd still take a 'Stang for long-range work and a Spit for short stuff.
 

...
There are two types of aeroplane, Spitfires and everything else that wishes it was a Spitfire!
IP Logged
 
Reply #14 - Jul 16th, 2003 at 6:31pm

Crumbso   Offline
Ground Hog

Posts:
*
 
I know but them spits are so gawdamn B-E-Autiful
 
IP Logged
 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Send Topic Print