Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Old Flight Simulator Series
›
FS 2002
› autopilot or manual
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
2
autopilot or manual (Read 627 times)
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 3:47am
Erhan
Offline
Colonel
Qantas..!
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 92
i realised in the 'ILS' thread, the guy asks what an ILS is, how it works etc, and peoples replies were quite a surprise to me, "landing the plane with the autopilot/flight director", dont take me wrong..im not a dummy for flight sim, i am actually a flight sim freak and know alot (been flying for 3 years), but i never knew the 'proper' way of landing was autopilot, is it actually the correct procedure, or is it only the lazy and untalent way of landing in low visibility - i have always flew manually, and never have i used autopilot to land before..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 5:08am
packercolinl
Offline
Colonel
Any more laid back I'd
be asleep!
Posts: 1049
You'll sure get some answers out of this!!
I use AP to get me there then land manually with due regard to weather conditions. I don't fly ILS although one day I'll get to it. Truth being,apart from ILS,I mix and match every option available in the system but in the end I prefer 'look and land'.
So I suppose the answer is there is no 'proper' way to land.
White on White fly all night.&&&&Red on White you're alright.&&&&Red on Red you'll soon be dead.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 5:48am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
its the lazy way of landing in bad weather with heavies:)
depends what sort of mood i am in but if you can do the landing manually all the better. keeps the sim interesting
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 8:06am
siemerh
Offline
Colonel
New Jersey
Gender:
Posts: 88
Sometimes I use it if I'm having trouble finding the airport or designated runway. Once I am sure of where I'm goind, I go manual. I also find the EFIS useful for the same reason. The point is - use whatever you want that gives you the most enjoyment. 8)
Where is it written?
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 10:04am
FSTipster
Offline
Colonel
There are no stupid questions,
only stupid answers
U.K.
Gender:
Posts: 1514
I use manual landing 99% of the time but I'm usually to be found flying the Baron. If I'm flying the big iron any distance, I'd possible consider using the autopilot.
Having said all that, there really is no "proper" way to land. In real world, pilots of ALL aircraft are required to do regular check rides (in proper scheduled flights) where they will land either using only some of the autopilot controls or, less frequently, completely on manual.
Do whatever you find the most fun - it's all "proper" as long as you walk away from it.
&&
Click the banner to visit the site
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 10:47am
WebbPA
Ex Member
I Like Flight Simulation!
When you say "manual" I assume you use AP to some point, then turn it off to land. Surely you wouldn't dream of flying a 747 from Seattle to San Diego with nothing but stick, throttle and trim?
For a heavy I use AP until about a mile or 2 out, then turn it off and land "manually" - flaps, gear and speed already set. Is this a "manual" landing?
For a prop you could, and I sometimes do for fun, turn off AP long before you enter the pattern and try your skill with stick, throttle and trim. Having the ILS on to show the glideslope isn't cheating but it's also fun (I'm practicing this in the Learjet) to land at an uncontrolled airport with no ILS, i.e. completely visual.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 11:17am
fisharno
Offline
Colonel
Your basic Forum Rat
Reno, Nv
Gender:
Posts: 626
I usually fly military heavies, always IFR, and 97% of the time capture the ILS/Localizer beacons for precision landings. But, let's not get confused. There's a difference between using AP for landings and making an insturment landing. Landing manually STILL involves using your insturments and following the beacons in to the runway. Precision landings are done in all weather conditions and it kind of increases the difficulty, "manually" riding the Localizer and Glideslope in and keeping the needles centered.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 12:10pm
FSTipster
Offline
Colonel
There are no stupid questions,
only stupid answers
U.K.
Gender:
Posts: 1514
Quote:
When you say "manual" I assume you use AP to some point, then turn it off to land. Surely you wouldn't dream of flying a 747 from Seattle to San Diego with nothing but stick, throttle and trim?
For a heavy I use AP until about a mile or 2 out, then turn it off and land "manually" - flaps, gear and speed already set. Is this a "manual" landing?
For a prop you could, and I sometimes do for fun, turn off AP long before you enter the pattern and try your skill with stick, throttle and trim. Having the ILS on to show the glideslope isn't cheating but it's also fun (I'm practicing this in the Learjet) to land at an uncontrolled airport with no ILS, i.e. completely visual.
It was only the landing phase I was referring to.
I use the autopilot a lot, even in the Baron, for maintianing cruise altitude and direction.
&&
Click the banner to visit the site
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 9:52pm
erhan(at internet cafe)
Guest
uhhhh ok cool, well i hardly ever use autpilot
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jun 2
nd
, 2003 at 10:23pm
Ronnie
Offline
Colonel
December 17, 1903. The
reason for FS.
Texas, USA
Gender:
Posts: 620
I always use autpilot for cruise unless it is a really short hop. In heavies, I usually have the autopilot set to maintain 250 knots, runway heading, and whatever altitude I am to cruise at, and then it is switched on as soon as the gear is retracted. My landings are always done manually; I don't even have a clue how to do an ILS.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jun 3
rd
, 2003 at 3:59am
Erhan
Offline
Colonel
Qantas..!
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 92
lol..by the way, the only reason i hardly use ap while in cruise is because while im at the computer, i may aswell use the stick, and if i am gone i pause it, cause when you create a flight plan, you have flight following, and if you dont change stations they cancel your IFR! :@ that sucks..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jun 3
rd
, 2003 at 12:32pm
csnyfan
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 16
I agree with you Erhan It seems if I step out of my room for no more than 2 minutes (mind you the prevous 10 minutes were silent) I come back to a cancelled flight plan - Well that just forces me to find an airport and land (or crash in my case) that bird as fast as I can - Although I must admit I did have a cancelled flight over NC and did find Charlotte Int and did land safely -
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jun 3
rd
, 2003 at 12:48pm
BFMF
Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest
Gender:
Posts: 19820
csnyfan, that's why your supposed to stay at the controlls no matter what during the entire flight
.....No playing around with the flight attendants
COMPLETED: If Anyone Cares, Here's A Map Of My Current FSX Flight Around The World
My Reality Check Bounced
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jun 3
rd
, 2003 at 2:42pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
i once did a flight from JFL to Boston without the autopilot in an Md88, i cant remember why i think i forgot to install some of the required, gauges, and let me tell you this, it was tiring even for a sim trying to keep it exactly level, even with trim it wanted to constantly pitch up.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Jun 4
th
, 2003 at 1:24am
Erhan
Offline
Colonel
Qantas..!
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 92
i just thought, there is totally nothing wrong about flight cancellation if your out of the room on auto-pilot, this is a 'simulator' right? and in real life if a pilot has to do a p*ss or whatever, there will always be one in the cockpit..so there ya go! you realise something everyday
lol
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
2
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002 ««
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.