Search the archive:
YaBB - Yet another Bulletin Board
 
   
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print
wxRE Active Sky. Worth the money? (Read 187 times)
May 28th, 2003 at 5:55am

_526th_Fireman   Offline
Colonel
S~ to all fair and honorable
pilots. S~!!
Joshua Texas

Gender: male
Posts: 1148
*****
 
He fellow flight simmers. I know there are some of you that use wxRE Active Sky. I am using the free version and the great cloud textures. Question is, is wxRE Active Sky that much better than the free version to justify paying for it? Is FS METEO ? better.

I love the "REAL" Weather effects but usually with the free Active Sky and even the FS2k2 default Real Weather, the METAR info is not really up to date. It can be many hrs, or even a day old.  AND, with the default FS2k2 Weather, most of the time I lose connection with the METAR site before it finishes downloading the info. Usually after many attempts I can finally get it. Sad  grrrr

Any input would be apprectiated.  Thanks in advance.
 

Systemax Sabre Ultimate gaming rig.&&&&I got all the goodies and all the power I need to run anything thrown at me for the next two months!
IP Logged
 
Reply #1 - May 28th, 2003 at 10:02am

FSTipster   Offline
Colonel
There are no stupid questions,
only stupid answers
U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 1514
*****
 
Like you, I only have the freeware version of Activesky, which I still consider to be one of the best available. Beats the pants of my previous payware version of FSMeteo.

The Metar information gathered is, as far as I'm aware, the latest available via the internet. I know it's not up to the minute, but neither is it anywhere else. That's why airports have ATIS.

I honestly don't think you'd view it as a good decision to go for the payware. The FS2004 specs for on-line real weather look pretty similar to most payware packages looking at it in the long term, and in the short term, I can't see any hypothetical improvements justifying the cost.  
 

...&&
Click the banner to visit the site
IP Logged
 
Reply #2 - May 28th, 2003 at 10:13am

codered   Offline
Colonel
Flight Plan Closed?

Posts: 1622
*****
 
Have you tried Weather-Maker 1.4?  Go to www.weather-maker.com and download this freeware utility.  It is the best freeware I have seen for weather creation.  It works in conjunction with FSUIPC, which can be downloaded from this site.  Couple this with FSW clouds 2002 se and you are set!  I created an 1:30 flight and took off in nice weather, went through a rain storm, into thunder and lightning, back to rain, then landed in 5 mile visiblity....

Great little program, and one of the best features it is free.  Worth a look.  I can't see paying for a weather program.  Granted the payware may do more, but I cannot say for sure.  After all it is just weather....
 

Windows XP SP1&&Motherboard: Epox 8RDA + main board&&Processor: AMD XP2500 Barton CPU&&Memory: PC2700 1gb Geil DDR&&Hard Drive: SEA HDD IDE 40GB 7M 40GPP&&Hard Drive: Western Digital 40gb 8mb cache&&Monitor 15 LCD Flat Panel Display (15 viewable)&&Video Card: ATI Radeon 9500 Pro&&Sound Card: Creative Labs Audigy 2
IP Logged
 
Reply #3 - May 28th, 2003 at 10:17am

FSTipster   Offline
Colonel
There are no stupid questions,
only stupid answers
U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 1514
*****
 
Quote:
Have you tried Weather-Maker 1.4?  Go to www.weather-maker.com and download this freeware utility.  It is the best freeware I have seen for weather creation.  It works in conjunction with FSUIPC, which can be downloaded from this site.  Couple this with FSW clouds 2002 se and you are set!  I created an 1:30 flight and took off in nice weather, went through a rain storm, into thunder and lightning, back to rain, then landed in 5 mile visiblity....

Great little program, and one of the best features it is free.  Worth a look.  I can't see paying for a weather program.  Granted the payware may do more, but I cannot say for sure.  After all it is just weather....


I have Weathermaker and you're right, it is a great program. However it doesn't (in this version) deal with real weather, only auto-generates fictional stuff.
 

...&&
Click the banner to visit the site
IP Logged
 
Reply #4 - May 28th, 2003 at 5:43pm

_526th_Fireman   Offline
Colonel
S~ to all fair and honorable
pilots. S~!!
Joshua Texas

Gender: male
Posts: 1148
*****
 
Thanks FSTipster and codered. I really appreciate your input.

I kind of figured that buying the WxActive Sky would not get me what I hoped for. Real time weather. Unless they have a much better site to get the METAR from. Don't think so.

Like you FSTipster, I really like the free version. Never fails to get the info and runs fine. So guess I will just stick with that until something really great comes along.

Codered, thanks for the info and link to Weather Maker. I will give it a read. But, I am really interested in the Real Weather aspect of the Sim.

Again, thanks boys for your valuable input.  S~
 

Systemax Sabre Ultimate gaming rig.&&&&I got all the goodies and all the power I need to run anything thrown at me for the next two months!
IP Logged
 
Reply #5 - May 28th, 2003 at 8:49pm
J G Parker   Guest

 
I got wxRE about a week ago, and have been experimenting with it.  I toyed with getting FSMeteo (which I had a few years ago and liked) but went with wxRE because it supplied visual effects (clouds, storms, etc.) to replace the default ones.  Also it has turbulance effects and good TI wake effects. Otherwise, like FSMeteo, it supplied live weather, which was important to me.  So...

I really like it.  The visual effects are sensational (no more magical cloud appearances, more realistic looking T-storms, winds aloft, etc.) and it does a wonderful job of updating my weather to real world conditions as I fly.  There is a neat 'briefing' feature that allows you to input the ICAOs of departure and destination, get the current weather and winds aloft, and plan accordingly.  Once you do this, wxRE locks in on your destination and scrolls weather updates for the location across your screen from time to time.  There is also a voice feature, which is something like the ATIS default feature in MS2k2.  It can be annoying tho, because it repeats 3-4 times before falling silent and I can turn it off (I heard you already!).  Two annoyances:  1.  You have to know how to decode METARS to interpret the flight planning briefing output (but not the local weather, which is read to you).  I read a small tutorial I found on the web. 2.  The server that updates the weather can be slow at peak times, and may have to retry.  This are really trivial tho.  On the whole, it has really been fun.  You can run it as a stand alone also, and I use it to check the actual weather (I live near an airport) sometimes for fun.  Nice manual too, very helpful with a general tutorial on weather as well as installation instructions, etc.

NOTE:  I purchased it directly from their site and saved 15$ US over what re-sellers were charging.  The transaction went smoothly.

NOTE NOTE:  It IS possible that MS will fix things in FS2k4, but I'm betting they won't enhance the clouds and weather enough to make me feel bad about the $20 I spent on this.
 
IP Logged
 
Reply #6 - May 28th, 2003 at 9:51pm

FSTipster   Offline
Colonel
There are no stupid questions,
only stupid answers
U.K.

Gender: male
Posts: 1514
*****
 
Quote:
NOTE NOTE:  It IS possible that MS will fix things in FS2k4, but I'm betting they won't enhance the clouds and weather enough to make me feel bad about the $20 I spent on this.  


Not in any way wanting you to feel bad, but from what I've seen, this is the area Microsoft have concentrated most heavily on for this release.

I can't see any way that the volumetric clouds in FS2004 are going to be beaten by anythig available for FS2002.

Whether the weather (I always wanted to say that Grin) is any better than what Activesky or other 3rd party software can offer remains to be seen but I doubt it personally.
 

...&&
Click the banner to visit the site
IP Logged
 
Reply #7 - May 29th, 2003 at 10:35am
J G Parker   Guest

 
It's all good.  The way I started thinking about it was that, for $20, I'll enjoy it all summer, even if MS dramatically  improves the weather and I don't need it anymore in August.  At the rate I fly, I figure it costs me less than a dime a flight for the rest of the summer (until FS2k4), and I definately enjoy the enhanced effects for the time being.
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Send Topic Print