Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
General
›
General Discussion
› TO ALL TREKIES AND/OR TREKERS (must read)
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Poll
Question:
Do you hide/negate the fact that you like Star Trek?
Yes
No
Sometimes (very often)
Sometimes (not so often)
Most of the time
Only to keep my job
Always
Yes but shhhhhh dont tell anyone...
« Created by:
Threadkiller
on: Apr 20
th
, 2003 at 6:46pm »
Pages:
1
TO ALL TREKIES AND/OR TREKERS (must read) (Read 3631 times)
Apr 20
th
, 2003 at 6:46pm
Threadkiller
Offline
Colonel
gah!
London, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 2463
i was being mocked the other day because i accept and i am proud of the fact that im a trekie but i stood up to the challenge and defended the Federation and her allies
they thought that i would be like all of the others, i would hide it and run away
most (almost all) of my friends hide the fact that they are trekies, is like a secret society
so i waas wondering.......
if u hide or dont accept the fact in public, please explain your reasons, we are here to overcome your fears
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Apr 20
th
, 2003 at 7:46pm
phil509
Offline
Colonel
are we there yet?
Geneva,Ohio USA
Gender:
Posts: 162
May you live long and prosper! I have encountered this phenomena frequently.I call my oldest son"#1",my minivan is"the shuttle craft"that at present only has 3/4 impulse power.When I agree with someone, I form my hands in a triangle and say"I reach,we are one!",And I named my youngest son,Wesley,after the child prodigy at the helm of the Enterprise.Next time someone hassles you,understand,they have not achived "kolinahr". Dont worry,Zephram Cochran is only a few years off now.I think our detractors need a good long look at a Medusan! Peace and tranquility be unto you. Take us out of orbit,Mr.Spaceace-ENGAGE!!!
To bad I cant make a living out of this,but it would probably kill me.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Apr 20
th
, 2003 at 7:57pm
Threadkiller
Offline
Colonel
gah!
London, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 2463
Quote:
Take us out of orbit,Mr.Spaceace-ENGAGE!!!
ay ay sir!!
V live peace and long life
lol i like ur explanation, and yes, when ppl bug me i just let them be
there are only two orces that are hard to fight and we have not been able to find a dicisive weapon to use against them, those are
1) The Borg
2) Ignorance
maybe the borg wll assimilate all the buggers and that way our probs will be solved
Kaplah!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Apr 20
th
, 2003 at 11:07pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
Sorry guys, I go back to TOS and for me, anything that came after Tiberius and the NCC-1701A seems like a cheap "carry-on-the-tradition" copy......
" Jim, ...he's dead ! "
" Fascinating ! "
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 2:59am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
of coarse i dont hide it:)
i can recite story lines from most of the next generation, i try to find ways to create some of these things they use.
only one i didnt like was DS9
although i dont go as far as dressing up as spock(those ears keep getting lost, not worth the hassel)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 6:26am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Hmmmm.......an interesting, yet intriguing enigma, Space.
In my age bracket (44), I don't get this problem. But I can see how the younger, pre-warp generations might find entertainment in belittling something as harmless and as innocent as a preference (or obsession) with a TV series.
If I was to come across such an attitude, I would just chuck a Worf and growl. That's if I couldn't fell them with my "Q" like wit and sarcasm.
Here in the Continuum (Aust) most have grown out of such behaviour.
Remember, there are only 3 things which cause a person to make fun of or belittle anothers' interests. Jealousy, lack of understanding (stupidity) and childishness. Me thinks the latter be the case here.
Oh, and Craig, I took a little while to cotton onto DS9 also (I think mainly because it wasn't taking place on a ship, and concerned mainly politics and semantics to begin with), but I kept getting the tapes from blockbuster and after the first season or two, things really hot up and you get to know the characters. The Station gets it's own "war ship" (the Defiant) and many a space adventure is had battling and outwitting all kinds of aliens and phenomena. There's even an "arch enemy" - the Dominion. So give it a go for a while. It's especially easy to do now that you can get about 10 or 12 episodes at a time and watch them in a short period. Beats waiting for weekly installments, that you may or may not be able to see.
All this goes for you too, Rifle, you................infidel
The Next generation is the very best ever series and my life would not be complete if i hadn't seen each episode at least 4 times over the years. Just give yourself time to get attached to the characters.
Live long and prosper........
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 6:49am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
oh i have seen all of ds9 i just could never get used to it, voyager took a while to get into but eventually i did, i will admit the new enterprise series has grown on me to, although i tend to pick out all the historical errors (new writing team) (prob straight out of college never seen an episode of star trek in their lives) but i do admit DS9 did have some good episodes to it.
and i have to agree with you on the next generation it was simply the best. the first series has to be the worst of the lot though the charachters were so tense and uptight all the way through.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 7:45am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Quote:
oh i have seen all of ds9 i just could never get used to it, voyager took a while to get into but eventually i did, i will admit the new enterprise series has grown on me to, although i tend to pick out all the historical errors (new writing team) (prob straight out of college never seen an episode of star trek in their lives) but i do admit DS9 did have some good episodes to it.
and i have to agree with you on the next generation it was simply the best. the first series has to be the worst of the lot though the charachters were so tense and uptight all the way through.
I'm glad to hear that you've seen the DS9 series through. I actually cried at the end of the last episode, especially when O'Brien and Julian said goodbye to each other.
I like TOS. The uptightness and the almost....satirical way in which the characters acted was part of the charm. I think it had to do with the fact that then, the possibility of all this actually happening in the future was laughable (no so now), so in order to have the series taken seriously it had to almost be treated as a.................well satire.
"For God's sake, Jim, I'm a Doctor not a gardener".......................lol
To tell you the truth, I'm not practicing what I preach. I rented the first 6 or 8 tapes (2 episodes each) of Enterprise as soon as they became available (TV here is about 18 months behind you blokes) and I was disappointed, and I must admit, I haven't perservered. But I will go down to Blockbuster and get the next 5 or 6 tapes that must now be available because I know there is a good chance I will get to like it.
I can't very well be a Trekkie if I'm not interested in the newest series, can I Rifle?....................lol
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 11:23am
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
I love it when we have Trek discussions here, it's the one suject that I can honestly say I know exactly what I'm talking about!
I've never hid the fact that I'm a mad Trekkie. In fact I've perfected the art of winding people up by dropping Treck talk into real life discussions.
Most of the people I work with are Trek fans to some degree, but none are quite as mad as I am. My partner Pamela thinks I'm barmy.
I have a huge collection of Trek memorabilia stashed away including autographs, models, video's, DVD's, Christmas Tree decorations, books etc. I've been to a few convetions over the years and met quite a few of the cast at one time or another.
I don't tend to get so involved with it all these days, but I still never miss a new episode of Enterprise on a Monday night and I still have wild fantasy's about Jeri Ryan (Assimilate me, Please!!)
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 11:58am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
so do you have a full size phaser then??
something i have always wanted to get hold of:)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 12:53pm
Fozzer
Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.
Posts: 24861
The original series I liked, with Captain Kirk, Mr. Spock, ("It's life Jim. But not as we know it.."), etc....
...!
The various follow-up series, to me, were poor copies of the original regarding the cast and characters...
...!
...*I still wonder how they managed to create gravity in the Starship NCC 1701.... ???...magnetic boots.... ???...?
...*and how did they know which way was up, and which way was down... ???...?
...*and how would they open all those doors if the pneumatic pumps failed... ???
LOL...!
I could never get used to Patrick Whatsisname's bald head in the new series....
....!
LOL...!
Cheers...
Paul.
(England).
P.S. ...*mustn't get too scientific about it tho'....
...LOL..!
P.P.S. I couldn't find a place to vote on this one, 'cos it didn't cover all the different program series....
...!
Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 1:21pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
as for the gravity they have artificial gravity i believe the klingons use gravity plating
and as for up down there isnt really an up or down in space inertial dampners are given as an excuse not to notice it
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 1:50pm
Fozzer
Offline
Colonel
An elderly FS 2004 addict!
Hereford. England. EGBS.
Posts: 24861
Quote:
as for the gravity they have artificial gravity i believe the klingons use gravity plating
and as for up down there isnt really an up or down in space inertial dampners are given as an excuse not to notice it
Hi Craig...
...!
As you didn't put any "LOL's" after your posting I assume that you REALLY believe all this space cods-wollop...LOL...!
...(the Klingons are slowly modifying your brain, Craig)
Either that or you have been listening to too many Buzz, "I have seen the light", Aldrin's preachings...oooopppssss....
...!
Take care...
LOL...LOL...LOL...!
Cheers mate...
...!
Paul.
(England. A nice place with gravity, breathable atmosphere, where up is always up, and all the doors have handles, etc...).
LOL...!
Dell Dimension 5000 BTX Tower. Win7 Home Edition, 32 Bit. Intel Pentium 4, dual 2.8 GHz. 2.5GB RAM, nVidia GF 9500GT 1GB. SATA 500GB + 80GB. Philips 17" LCD Monitor. Micronet ADSL Modem only. Saitek Cyborg Evo Force. FS 2004 + FSX. Briggs and Stratton Petrol Lawn Mower...Motor Bikes. Gas Cooker... and lots of musical instruments!.... ...!
Yamaha MO6,MM6,DX7,DX11,DX21,DX100,MK100,EMT10,PSR400,PSS780,Roland GW-8L v2,TR505,Casio MT-205,Korg CX3v2 dual manual,+ Leslie 760,M-Audio Prokeys88,KeyRig,Cubase,Keyfax4,Guitars,Orchestral,Baroque,Renaissance,Medieval Instruments.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 2:06pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
hahah:)
vulcan's mr fozzer:) not klingon:)lol
believe no, going about how they describe it yes:)
cheers mate:)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 7:15pm
Threadkiller
Offline
Colonel
gah!
London, Ontario
Gender:
Posts: 2463
Quote:
i dont go as far as dressing up as spock
lol i go there...... sometimes i go to skool wearing the ears
ppl call me ELF BOY stupid humans unworthy of assimilation! i bet they are way dumber than the Kazon....lol
and yes, brensec is right, for us, the pre warp civilizations, is hard to get it over with at skool. (stupid people!!!
) anyway......
fozzer, cpt.Picard's real name is PATRICK STUART or something like that, my friend danny is his biggest fan, i thinkk he's going crazy, he bought this thing from the ST magazine that u plug into a lamp or something and then say "computer lower lights to 25% luminocity"and then the thing answers back, u have to give the comands in quarters only, if u dont the thing will say "unable to comply" lol is hilarous! the first day i saw it i was LMAO! its like 90 bux tho
expensive for a fancy thing
but im saving to get one
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 7:50pm
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Quote:
as for the gravity they have artificial gravity i believe the klingons use gravity plating
and as for up down there isnt really an up or down in space inertial dampners are given as an excuse not to notice it
Sorry Craig, I'm never a nit-picker, but this is Star Trek!
Inertial dampers exist so the people (and objects) inside the ship don't end up as paint on the bulkhead when it goes from Zero to Billions of miles per second in a flash.
(At school they'll tell you that "inertia" is the force which acts upon an object to keep it still, when still and keep it moving, when moving. Not to be mistaken for "momentum" which could be used as a replacement for the "keep moving part" but not the "keep still part". P.S. I converted this into people talk, rather than confuse everyone (oh...............God - someone shoot me, Please!..........lol)
There seems to be no up or down in deep space, simply because there is no reference. When they arrive at a planet, the ship is usually placed in orbit so that the planet is to the side or underneath, as it would be disconcerting to see the planet above. As we know from Shuttle orbit shots, it can look strange if it's upside down compared to the earth.
Oh! And it's Patrick STEWART.
Actually Fozzer, he has an extremely impressive resume, with regard to his Stage, TV and movie credits. I believe he started as a Shakespearian actor.
http://www.gruhlke.de/stewart/
Here'a a good site on him. It contains a WAV. download of him reciting an Antonio Vivaldi....................Oh, yummy, what a beautiful voice. If I wasn't a man............(shut up Steve - Quick)
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 8:43pm
phil509
Offline
Colonel
are we there yet?
Geneva,Ohio USA
Gender:
Posts: 162
ILLOGICAL! Star trek represents the last hope of humanity to overcome our petty diferences,and look to the stars for our future as a spiecies.Gene Rodenberry was 200 years ahead of his time,he was a genuise who pointed the way ,not only to boldly go where no man has gone before,but to seek out those new lifeforms and civilisations that ARE out there!Its human nature to seek and discover and learn;If we loose this as part of our nature,were doomed to extinction,without so mutch as a disc in the library on Memory Alpha to recollect us. Space IS the final frontier-we must go,or maybey our world is flat? First star to the right,sraight on`till morning,warp factor 2-ENGAGE!!!
To bad I cant make a living out of this,but it would probably kill me.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #17 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 8:46pm
Blade
Offline
Colonel
Annapolis, MD
Gender:
Posts: 2477
My fav qoute "Helm Warp 1 Engage!"
&&&&Dell 4550&&P4 2.53Ghz &&512MB DDR SDRAM&&GeForceFX 5900 129MB&&60GB HD @ 7200RPM &&PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #18 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 8:57pm
Iroquois
Offline
Colonel
Happy Halloween
Ontario Canada
Gender:
Posts: 3244
Ah Star Trek, I don't love it, but I don't hate it either. I liked Voyager the best. I believe that voyager took on a more Starwars view of the universe, that being that the galaxy is a dangerous place, which is probably a more realistic view of things. Not all beings we run into will be peaceful and many will want to fight. We are but a speck in a wide uncharted expanse, nobody knows whats around the next corner.
I never liked the original series, too campy and the sets, even for the time could have been way better than they were. Enterprise seems very campy as well, sort of "golly gee wiz" as the Toronto Sun TV Magazine put it.
I only pretend to know what I'm talking about. Heck, that's what lawyers, car mechanics, and IT professionals do everyday.
&&The Rig: &&AMD Athlon XP2000+ Palomino, ECS K7S5A 3.1, 1GB PC2700 DDR, Geforce FX5200 128mb, SB Live Platinum, 16xDVD, 16x10x40x CDRW, 40/60gb 7200rpm HDD, 325w Power, Windows XP Home SP1, Directx 9.0c with 66.81 Beta gfx drivers
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #19 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 9:07pm
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
I remember asking this question in one of the previous Trekkie threads and no-one could help, so I try again. maybe someone has seen what I need, or at least a formula to calculate same.
I'd like to get hold of a Warp scale of some sort. Even though it's fictitious, there was a scale worked out, either real or invented, for what each factor represented in terms of light speed.
We all know Warp 1 is the speed of light (C x 1).
Each factor increases exponentially to the point where I know from a couple of mentions in Star Trek episodes and library info that Warp 6 is (C x 392).
Apparently Warp 10 is supposed to be an infinite speed which will place the ship (or object) at every point in the Universe simultaneously (ungraspable for me) however, they speak of Warp 9.95 (Voyagers top speed) as being as "near as damn it" to (C x 1000), ie, 75 years to travel 75,000 light years back to Earth at maximum Warp.
Has anyone seen or know of a chart or scale, or even a formula to calculate what each Warp factor (or part thereof) is?
If anyone has seen an episode or read on a "movie cover story outline" etc that mentions exactly what another of the factors is equal to, that may help if I can get enough reference to work out the formula.
Thanks
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #20 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 9:32pm
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Quote:
Ah Star Trek, I don't love it, but I don't hate it either. I liked Voyager the best. I believe that voyager took on a more Starwars view of the universe, that being that the galaxy is a dangerous place, which is probably a more realistic view of things. Not all beings we run into will be peaceful and many will want to fight. We are but a speck in a wide uncharted expanse, nobody knows whats around the next corner.
I never liked the original series, too campy and the sets, even for the time could have been way better than they were. Enterprise seems very campy as well, sort of "golly gee wiz" as the Toronto Sun TV Magazine put it.
Maybe the the Toronto Sun TV Mag has hit the nail in terms of my trouble in getting attached to it. But as I said, I will perservere, there's too much at risk not to. (My God....a matter of life and death in liking a TV series...............lol)
Although, Orenda, the other series were continually dealing with hostile aliens and phenonmena also. How do you mean Voyager was more "hostile environment" oriented. On DS9, the whole series is a result and consequence of a planet being "occupied" in a very Nazi-like way for 50 years.
Iknow what you say in terms of Voyager being trapped in a unknown quadrant with no idea of what's around the corner. Their lives and chances of getting home are dependent on finding friendly races to help and to trade with and maybe pick up some technology to get them home a bit quicker...............................I'm babbling now...............
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #21 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 10:22pm
denishc
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 1018
Since we're on this "Star Trek" thread there is a question I have about its latest incarnation, "Enterprise", that's been bothering me. Is the character Sub-Commander Ta Pol the same character that presided over Spock's wedding to Te'Pring in the original series?
(Please excuse any misspelling of the names.)
Thanks.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #22 -
Apr 21
st
, 2003 at 11:16pm
Rifleman
Offline
Colonel
" Full size A/C are just
overgrown models ! "
Tropical island in the Pacific
Posts: 6622
All hands, prepare for collision.....we are approaching the future once again and it appears we can't avoid a few bumps as we overrun the next generation, DS-9, and some other entities which have evolved in a space and time we once occupied................Capt Christopher, report to the transporter deck, and hurry, ....you only have a hundred years to get there...........
Now hear this.......all decks...........will Yoeman Rand report to the cabin of Security Officer Rifleman...........
«
Last Edit: Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 10:35am by Rifleman
»
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #23 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 12:00am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Quote:
Since we're on this "Star Trek" thread there is a question I have about its latest incarnation, "Enterprise", that's been bothering me. Is the character Sub-Commander Ta Pol the same character that presided over Spock's wedding to Te'Pring in the original series?
(Please excuse any misspelling of the names.)
Thanks.
Is this the episode where Spock goes thru the "fon par" (spelling?) and returns to Vulcan only to find that his "intended" has another in mind. Somehow their ends up being a fight to the death between Spock and Kirk. McCoy renders Kirk "dead" by means of an injection so that the rules are satisfied.
If this is the episode you mean, I don't know if the Vulcan woman in charge is the same as she who is depicted in the new series. I'll have a look around and see if I can find out.
Hang on and I get back.
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #24 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 1:29am
#2
Guest
Quote:
"It's life Jim. But not as we know it.."
LOL, that's one of the the lines in the song "Star Trekin' ", a parody of the show, sometimes heard on the Dr. Demento radio show over here in the states. It starts out "Star Trekin' across the universe, boldy going forward 'cause we can't find reverse........." It degrades from there. A very funny song.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #25 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 1:42am
denishc
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 1018
Hello brensec,
Yes, that's the episode I'm thinking about. If she is it would be an "interesting" way to tie the two series together.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #26 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 4:03am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Quote:
Hello brensec,
Yes, that's the episode I'm thinking about. If she is it would be an "interesting" way to tie the two series together.
It would be.
Just as a matter of interest, I think Tuvok's wife has the same name also. Maybe it's Vulcan for Jane.............lol.
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #27 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 4:52am
phil509
Offline
Colonel
are we there yet?
Geneva,Ohio USA
Gender:
Posts: 162
Quote:
I remember asking this question in one of the previous Trekkie threads and no-one could help, so I try again. maybe someone has seen what I need, or at least a formula to calculate same.
I'd like to get hold of a Warp scale of some sort. Even though it's fictitious, there was a scale worked out, either real or invented, for what each factor represented in terms of light speed.
We all know Warp 1 is the speed of light (C x 1).
Each factor increases exponentially to the point where I know from a couple of mentions in Star Trek episodes and library info that Warp 6 is (C x 392).
Apparently Warp 10 is supposed to be an infinite speed which will place the ship (or object) at every point in the Universe simultaneously (ungraspable for me) however, they speak of Warp 9.95 (Voyagers top speed) as being as "near as damn it" to (C x 1000), ie, 75 years to travel 75,000 light years back to Earth at maximum Warp.
Has anyone seen or know of a chart or scale, or even a formula to calculate what each Warp factor (or part thereof) is?
If anyone has seen an episode or read on a "movie cover story outline" etc that mentions exactly what another of the factors is equal to, that may help if I can get enough reference to work out the formula.
Thanks
Starfleet technical manuals are available at most Trek related websites,I dont have an address handy,but I know theres lots of them.
To bad I cant make a living out of this,but it would probably kill me.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #28 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 5:01am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
warp 10 was attained by tom paris once and it caused his DNA to alter in some weird way. as for the inertial dampners i know thats what they are used for but then removed the point as it had no relevence to fozzers question as he asked for a simple explination. as for a warp scale its actually impossible to give you one, because it has actually changed twice, there was the original warp scale used in the original series that had a maximum of warp 5 which was the equivelent of warp 3 in the next generation series. there was an explination given in one episode as to why it was changed but i cant remember why, and they seem to use a differant scale in enterprise to.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #29 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 11:20am
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Quote:
Is this the episode where Spock goes thru the "fon par" (spelling?) and returns to Vulcan only to find that his "intended" has another in mind. Somehow their ends up being a fight to the death between Spock and Kirk. McCoy renders Kirk "dead" by means of an injection so that the rules are satisfied.
If this is the episode you mean, I don't know if the Vulcan woman in charge is the same as she who is depicted in the new series. I'll have a look around and see if I can find out.
Hang on and I get back.
Ok guys I can' believe no one remembers the Hight priestess' name! It is of course T'Pau. The episode is called "Amock Time" and you have the story line quite right there brensec pal!
T'Pau is no relation to T'Pol. Most Vulcan women have names begining with "T'", just like most Vulcan males names that start "SP" but not all. Spocks half brother was named Sybok and then there is also Tuvok.
As for that Warp scale, I'm quite sure it is in the Technical Manual or the Encyclopaedia. Ill try and dig it out later and I'll post a scan of the page if I find it.
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #30 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 3:26pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
here is the basic warp formula for enterprise D(the greatest ship in my opinion).
At the beginning of Star Trek: The Next Generation, Gene Roddenberry said he wanted to change the warp-speed scale to put warp 10 at the absolute top of the scale. ...The warp scale has been recalibrated so that all the speeds shown in the original show are "actually" less than warp 10. Interestingly, the original Star Trek series never established actual speeds for warp factors in any episode or movie, although the old warp factor cubed formula has come to be generally accepted.
Summary warp speed chart for Starship Enterprise, NCC-1701D
where c = 1078 million km/h
Speed Description
Standard orbit 9600 km/h (SUBLIGHT)
Full impulse 0.25c (SUBLIGHT)
Warp factor 1 1c
Warp factor 2 10c
Warp factor 3 39c
Warp factor 4 102c
Warp factor 5 214c
Warp factor 6 392c
Warp factor 7 656c
Warp factor 8 1024c
Warp factor 9 1516c
Warp factor 9.2 1649c
Warp factor 9.6 1909c
Warp factor 9.9 3053c
Warp factor 9.99 7912c
Warp factor 9.9999 199516c
Warp factor 10 infinite
Warp factor 14.1 improbable
This speed is meaningless - since a starship at Warp 10 would occupy all points in the universe simultaneously. see also:
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #31 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 4:03pm
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Well, Craig beat me to it, but I spent a couple of hours finding my Encyclopedia, so I'm going to give my scale in MPH!
Warp 1 = 670 Million MPH (Light x1)
Warp 2 = 7 Billion MPH (Light x 10)
Warp 3 = 26 Billion MPH (Light x 39)
Warp 4 = 68 Billion MPH (Light x 102)
Warp 5 = 143 Billion MPH (Light x 214)
Warp 6 = 263 Billion MPH (Light x 392)
Warp 7 = 439 Billion MPH (Light x 656)
Warp 8 = 686 Billion MPH (Light x 1024)
Warp 9 = 102 Trillion MPH (Light x 1,516)
Warp 9.9 = 2.04 Trillion MPH (Light x 3,053)
Warp 9.999 etc = 134 Trillion MPH (Light x 199,516)
Warp 10 = Infinite!
Don't blame me if it makes no sence, I copied it right out of the book so blame Michael Okuda!!
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #32 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 4:13pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
in some ways yours makes more sence as it gives the speeds exactly as they are no need to go about working them out:)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #33 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 4:33pm
phil509
Offline
Colonel
are we there yet?
Geneva,Ohio USA
Gender:
Posts: 162
Isn't it true that when warp 10 is exceded,time reverses?I.E.,the "slingshot"effect;and what about when the Kelvins seized the Enterprise,and exceded warp 13 on the way to Andromeda?Is this descrepancy due to the difference in calibration charts,as above mentioned?Please elaborate.
To bad I cant make a living out of this,but it would probably kill me.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #34 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 4:47pm
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Quote:
Isn't it true that when warp 10 is exceded,time reverses?I.E.,the "slingshot"effect;and what about when the Kelvins seized the Enterprise,and exceded warp 13 on the way to Andromeda?Is this descrepancy due to the difference in calibration charts,as above mentioned?Please elaborate.
I'll have to check Star Trek 4, but I think the sling shot took place at about Warp 9.6. I'll check tomorrow because It's late here now!
The Warp scale was redrawn for TNG with Warp 10 the maximum and the TOS speed of Warp 14 was said to be about Warp 8 on the new scale.
Of Course, Transwarp and Quatum Slip Stream are faster, but that's for another day, I'm tired and I want to go to bed.
Number One, you have the Bridge!
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #35 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 5:28pm
phil509
Offline
Colonel
are we there yet?
Geneva,Ohio USA
Gender:
Posts: 162
Very well,Captain.May I suggest a nightcap of Sorrian brandy?I aquired some at that last seizure from the Ferengi. "Its green!"
To bad I cant make a living out of this,but it would probably kill me.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #36 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 9:23pm
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Thank you Craig and Hawker.
This is valuable to me. I'm involved in an exercise at the moment for which this will make aprt of the job easier. more about it, one day.
As for the Transwarp method of travel (as used by the Borg). I believe this is a "conduit" which exists in subspace and serves as a "portal" (for want of a better word to transport a vessel from one point to another without actually covering the distance, as such. Much the same as a "worm hole" does. In the case of the Borg, they have an entire network of these 'conduits covering the galaxy.
Apparently, you can't just exit a conduit at any time. You have to follow it to it's "destination". Once again, much like a "worm hole". Although I seem to recall an event or two where a vessel has "dropped" out of a conduit, but my recollection suggests it is a very dangerous occurence.
I have one small problem with the Warp scale. As I said before, and this may just be due to bad writing on the part of the Paramount people.
Voyager was definitely sent 75,000 light years from home. Many times the return journey was calculated to take 75 years at "maximum Warp" (and this is further supported by the appropriate adjustments as time passes or they gain a large distance by way of Kes' Gift of 10 light years etc.)
This being the case, I would assume maximum warp (for Voyager at 9.995) to be around 1000c. The chart does not reflect this.
In fact, at Voyagers maximum warp (say 9.9 - which is less than they quote) it would be 3053c, in which case the journey would be approx. 30% of the 75 years the keep mentioning.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...........................
P.S. I'm not 100% sure of the top speed of Voyager, I'll check, but i'm sure it's either 9.95 or 9.995 or 9.975. In any event, the 9.9 (3053c) is within their capability.
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #37 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 9:30pm
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
Quote:
here is the basic warp formula for enterprise D(the greatest ship in my opinion).
At the beginning of Star Trek: The Next Generation, Gene Roddenberry said he wanted to change the warp-speed scale to put warp 10 at the absolute top of the scale. ...The warp scale has been recalibrated so that all the speeds shown in the original show are "actually" less than warp 10. Interestingly, the original Star Trek series never established actual speeds for warp factors in any episode or movie, although the old warp factor cubed formula has come to be generally accepted.
Summary warp speed chart for Starship Enterprise, NCC-1701D
where c = 1078 million km/h
Speed Description
Standard orbit 9600 km/h (SUBLIGHT)
Full impulse 0.25c (SUBLIGHT)
Warp factor 1 1c
Warp factor 2 10c
Warp factor 3 39c
Warp factor 4 102c
Warp factor 5 214c
Warp factor 6 392c
Warp factor 7 656c
Warp factor 8 1024c
Warp factor 9 1516c
Warp factor 9.2 1649c
Warp factor 9.6 1909c
Warp factor 9.9 3053c
Warp factor 9.99 7912c
Warp factor 9.9999 199516c
Warp factor 10 infinite
Warp factor 14.1 improbable
This speed is meaningless - since a starship at Warp 10 would occupy all points in the universe simultaneously. see also:
The MASSIVE jumps in the fractional factors after 9 are a little perplexing. Especially when you consider that 5.5 is probably around half way between 214c and 392c, as would be expected.
I've always been good at Maths and Physics, but exponential calculation has always boggled my mind a tad. (There's a good, sound Mathematical expression - the "Tad")................lol
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #38 -
Apr 22
nd
, 2003 at 9:39pm
denishc
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 1018
Yo Hawker Temoest 5,
Thanks for setting us straight on the T'Pol character, but too bad they're not one in the same. It would have been one hell of a tie in. Oh well, at least that's one less thing on my mind and now I can sleep peacefully at night.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #39 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 2:23am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
the borgs slipstreams can actually be diverted but doing so, would cause a ship to be thrown from the slipstream something like 5 10 seconds later. as happend to voyager in that episode where they got buired under ice.
and voyagers top speed is 9.975. remember there wasnt a dircet passage to earth from their starting position so they added into account those on the time frames.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #40 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 5:19am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
So what your saying, Craig is that the 75,000 light years is the distance "as the crow flies", but Voyager had to go around such things as Nebulae, The Necrid Expanse etc (although I think they went thru that, but you get the idea).
How did they know what obstacles would have caused them to divert etc, before they reached them.
I always thought of any distance, and consequent estimated time to cover, in Star Trek as a straight line from point a to point b.
As I understand it, while at Warp, obstacles don't get in the way. (One example is Worfs' brothers escape from an attacking Klingon ship during the Klingon War, where he heads for the Sun and goes to Warp just as the ship is about to break up).
I may be wrong. My understanding of Warp theory is a bit lacking compared to some Trekkies.
Still you have to admit, it's great fun talking about it.
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #41 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 6:02am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
if you get a chance to check out the voyager elite force game it shows it as a direct route. but there are many obsticals in the way like you said.
the thing with warp is it cant be used in solar systems as you dont go through obsticals and at warp a ship cant be turned so if a planet is in the way you go splat, as for how they knew what things were in the way, it started with neelix who knew upto that one nebula then he went onto get the map while getting into a ton of trouble with janeway, then they used maps from other cultures to
and then of coarse they came across omega which made an entire area of space unusable at anything more than impulse
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #42 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 11:23am
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
I must admit I take all this Warp theory with a huge pinch of salt and I think the writers do too.
You are quite correct brensec pal in that Voyager was 75,000 Light Years from home and it would take 75 years to get home, but I always just thought as Craig said that the actual path back to the Alpha quadrant was not a direct line. I don't think a vessel could travel through the Galactic core for one thing.
As far as Transwarp goes, yes it is a short cut through Sub Space, but if you also remember Star Fleet tried a Transwarp experiment with the Excelsior back in the 23rd century and that is said to have failed. Also, Tom Paris modified a Voyager Shuttle to travel at Transwarp speed without using a conduit. I always take Transwarp to mean faster than warp 10, however in Borg terms it does mean traveling through sub space.
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #43 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 11:57am
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
the one thing i dont understand is voyager had to travel through the gamma quadrent before entering the alpha quadrent and the route was only a few light years away from the DS9 wormhole, so why they didnt ever include it in the plan i dont know, ok cardassian space was also there but it would have been a small problem to cut 15 years off the trip time.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #44 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 12:23pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
ok after doing some further research into the voyager thingy apparently after they return home janeway apparently is promoted to admiral while picard is overlooked for the promotion. which really annoys me as then janeway gives picard orders to goto into the heart of the romulan empire with the enterprise(is that for the new movie)?? i personally dont think she should have been given it before picard as he has done so many more important things, he found kirk when they thought he was dead, he prepaired starfleet for the borg he dealt with the Q he even went further into outer space than janeway and voyager in the traveller episode where they were taken to a point where the universe hadnt even been formed yet.
i think she was just ticked that he was given the best ship starfleet had going in both the D and E models of the enterprise, i mean D was the best ship going and is prob the best ship for battle as it has unmatched weaponary especially after the upgrades for the dominion war. and the Enterprise E, what can be said other than unbelievable, quantom torpedos, new sheilding unmatched power for travel in someways its invincible:) thats why she gave him those orders
as for tuvoks wife from earlier question hr name was T'pel
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #45 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 1:02pm
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Quote:
ok after doing some further research into the voyager thingy apparently after they return home janeway apparently is promoted to admiral while picard is overlooked for the promotion. which really annoys me as then janeway gives picard orders to goto into the heart of the romulan empire with the enterprise(is that for the new movie)?? i personally dont think she should have been given it before picard as he has done so many more important things, he found kirk when they thought he was dead, he prepaired starfleet for the borg he dealt with the Q he even went further into outer space than janeway and voyager in the traveller episode where they were taken to a point where the universe hadnt even been formed yet.
i think she was just ticked that he was given the best ship starfleet had going in both the D and E models of the enterprise, i mean D was the best ship going and is prob the best ship for battle as it has unmatched weaponary especially after the upgrades for the dominion war. and the Enterprise E, what can be said other than unbelievable, quantom torpedos, new sheilding unmatched power for travel in someways its invincible:) thats why she gave him those orders
as for tuvoks wife from earlier question hr name was T'pel
Interesting points Craig. I remember seeing somewhere that Voyager would need to cross the Gamama quadrant. I'm sure they would have used the Bajoran Wormhole had they have got that far, but after seven years of travel, Voyager never got out of the Delta Quadrant until it eventually found the Borg Transwarp Hub and got all the way home.
As for Picard not being promoted, well he turned down the chance to be an admiral in "Coming of age" deciding he was of more use to Starfleet on the bridge of the Enterprise. Also, Kirk tells him not to allow Starfleet to promote him and to do whatever it takes to keep his Starship command. Personally I think he should have taken a desk job years ago and let Ryker (who turned down promotion 3 times even after getting his fourth pip) to take the centre seat.
I would guess that Janeway was given the rank so as to reward her for getting Voyager home, intact, after being cut off from Starfleet for seven years.
What I want to know is what happened to all her crew who where not Starfleet? Chakotay, B'Elanna, Seven of Nine?
«
Last Edit: Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 4:06pm by HawkerTempest5
»
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #46 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 1:13pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
very true on the picard thing, but i think both his and rikers reasons for turning down promotion were the same, they could both have had better jobs riker could have had his own ship in the middle of nowhere but it would have been his, or serve on the flag ship but only as a commander and same for picard simply put being the guy in charge of the flag ship is considered the top captain in starfleet and like you said kirk told him not to let it go.
as for the way voyager ended although its frustrating not to know what happens next i still think it was the best ending to a series yet for that very reason
do you remember the way the next generation series ended? because i dont think it actually did, but was considered over when NCC1701D was destroyed
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #47 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 1:33pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
well i am truely bored after more research another reason for the long time frame to reach earth is because voyager cannot sustain warp 9.975 for long periods of time as the warp coils tend to burn out
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #48 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 2:28pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
ok even with broadband this took over half an hour to get but i got the demo which thankfully had the route map of voyager so here ya go
surprisingly it doesnt go past the wormhole but would have prob worked out quicker to go that way
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #49 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 4:14pm
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Ah, I see now what you ment about the Bajoran Wormhole Craig. Yes you are right it would have been quicker to take that route. I also got my Gamma and Beta Quadrants mixed up. It is of course the Bata and not the Gamma quadrant that Voyager needed to pass through.
I agree that "End Game" was the best last show. The DS9 final was good in bits and the Next Gen's "All Good Things" was good with that future Enterprise destroying those klingon ships with that huge phaser cannon!
I think it would be nice to see some DS9 and Voyager cast in a future Trek movie.
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #50 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 4:20pm
Craig.
Offline
Colonel
Birmingham
Gender:
Posts: 18590
i think voyagers final episodes would have been a really good option for a movie with a few modifications, i dont think DS9 though would be a good choice for one.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #51 -
Apr 23
rd
, 2003 at 5:57pm
phil509
Offline
Colonel
are we there yet?
Geneva,Ohio USA
Gender:
Posts: 162
Quote:
i think voyagers final episodes would have been a really good option for a movie with a few modifications, i dont think DS9 though would be a good choice for one.
I'd like to see more emphasis on Klingons,and the klingon empire.How about a story line where the Klingons deal the Borg their final defeat,in glorios battle,with co-operation of the Federation of course?By the way,you know how some folks have a plastic Jesus on the dashboard of their "shuttlecraft",well,I have a Klingon.LONG LIVE THE EMPIRE!! 8)
To bad I cant make a living out of this,but it would probably kill me.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #52 -
Apr 24
th
, 2003 at 11:08am
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
Quote:
I'd like to see more emphasis on Klingons,and the klingon empire.How about a story line where the Klingons deal the Borg their final defeat,in glorios battle,with co-operation of the Federation of course?By the way,you know how some folks have a plastic Jesus on the dashboard of their "shuttlecraft",well,I have a Klingon.LONG LIVE THE EMPIRE!! 8)
That sounds like a great idea. I'd like to see the Klingons beat up on the Borg.
I used to have a small Voyager model on my dashboard, but now I have a Spitfire!
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #53 -
Apr 25
th
, 2003 at 2:33am
Professor Brensec
Offline
Colonel
Can't you give me a couple
more inches, Adam?
SYDNEY - AUSTRALIA
Gender:
Posts: 2955
I definitely hope that there will be more in the way of feature movies. It seems that the obsession has been with TOS and NG, as far as the movies are concerned but as has been said, why not a movie involving the DS9 people and the Station or indeed a continuation of Voyager in the form of a movie. It would be a good opportunity to cover what happened to the "Marquis" crew members. Although I suspect that with all the accomplishments of Belana and Chikote etc, especially all the times they were singularly responsible for saving the lives of the entire crew and the ship, plus saving planets etc, they would have been given pardons for whatever they may have done against Federation Law.
I'm sure they weren't guilty of anything really bad like murder (although they may have killed the odd Cardie in self defence).
Thanks for the look at the map, Craig. It served a couple of purpose for me. Firstly I never knew that the Romulan and Klingon Empires were just inside the Beta Quadrant (although I somehow knew that Earth was near the border between the A & B). Secondly, even though they journey via the Gamma Quadrant and then through the Wormhole to Bajor, may have bben a bit longer (although it seems pretty close), one advantage would have been that it looks like they would have avoided Borg Space (even though they didn't know where it was at the time they set out).
P.S. One of my favourite characters is "Q". I'd like to see another movie in which he plays a good sized role.
Maybe a good plot would be where he lobs on Earth some time after the Voyager crew has come home and, being his usual mischievous self, he takes them all back to the Delta quadrant (in Voyager) and for a while, at least, it seems the hole thing is about to start again.
LOL....what a mongrel!.................
&&
&&
http://www.ra.online-plus.biz&&&&&&I
cried because I had no shoes - until I saw a man who had no feet.&&&&Dell Dimension 8100 - Intel P4 1.7 Gb - 512 RD Ram - nVidia GeForce 128 mb FX5200.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #54 -
Apr 25
th
, 2003 at 11:00am
HawkerTempest5
Offline
Colonel
Hawker Tempest MK V
United Kingdom
Gender:
Posts: 3149
I quite like the "Q" movie idea brensec pal. I really think a future movie should at least make use of some characters from Voyager and DS9. With Ryker, Crusher, Troi and Data leaving the Enterprise, wouldn't it be a good idea to have some DS9/Voyager crew replace them?
Flying Legends
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion ««
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.