Simviation Forum

Apr 9^th, 2003 at 9:00am

PSYCO Offline
Colonel
101st ABN DIV 90-96
USA

Gender:
Posts: 68

The top one is from my beloved Falcon 4.0.The bottom is from msFS 2002 pro.witch one is better guys

« Last Edit: Apr 25^th, 2003 at 8:34pm by PSYCO »

F-15E STRIKE EAGLE.COM

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #1 - Apr 9^th, 2003 at 11:06am

Eric_Rose Offline
Colonel
Just Became A Daddy!!!!!!!!!!
!!

Gender:
Posts: 392

Well, coming from a very avid fan of Falcon 4.0, I just can't turn away! I love the Falcon 4.0 version! All the moving parts, sound, airbreaks, the incredible afterburner effects. I just think that nothing compares!
Eric

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #2 - Apr 9^th, 2003 at 11:48am

Mr. Bones Offline
Colonel

Posts: 4304

looking to these shots, i'd say Falcon 4.0 is the best one but...

first of all...there are much better F-16 versions available for FS2002...
and keep in mind that FS is developped to be a flightsim for civil aviation, not for fighter planes. if you put lets say a jumbo in falcon 4.0 and then compare it with FS2002 you would also say: FS is the best. what i wanna say is that you can't compare different flightsims developped for different purposes.

just my opinion Wink

Raw power...the J-58.&&&&&&My Anet collection.&&

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #3 - Apr 9^th, 2003 at 12:42pm

DeepSpace Offline
Colonel
I love to fly!
Israel

Gender:
Posts: 434

Quote:

looking to these shots, i'd say Falcon 4.0 is the best one but...

first of all...there are much better F-16 versions available for FS2002...
and keep in mind that FS is developped to be a flightsim for civil aviation, not for fighter planes. if you put lets say a jumbo in falcon 4.0 and then compare it with FS2002 you would also say: FS is the best. what i wanna say is that you can't compare different flightsims developped for different purposes.

just my opinion Wink

yeh, my thought too

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #4 - Apr 9^th, 2003 at 12:54pm

ATI_9700pro Ex Member

falcon 4.0, of course! are you guys already playing it with SP3??

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #5 - Apr 9^th, 2003 at 7:13pm

PSYCO Offline
Colonel
101st ABN DIV 90-96
USA

Gender:
Posts: 68

I wasn't trying to compare the two flight sims just the eyecandy Roll Eyes

Can you give me a link or maybe a screenie of this better F-16? would love to see it.

« Last Edit: Apr 10^th, 2003 at 12:22pm by PSYCO »

F-15E STRIKE EAGLE.COM

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #6 - Apr 10^th, 2003 at 12:25pm

PSYCO Offline
Colonel
101st ABN DIV 90-96
USA

Gender:
Posts: 68

So whos' got the baddest F-16? ??? ???

F-15E STRIKE EAGLE.COM

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #7 - Apr 11^th, 2003 at 9:02am

ATI_9700pro Ex Member

MSFS 2002

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #8 - Apr 11^th, 2003 at 11:49am

Whitey Offline
Colonel
Scotland

Gender:
Posts: 2697

The combat F-16 is better in Falcon 4.0...but I think the Thunderbirds one is better in FS2002. Roll Eyes

BTW, is the Thunderbirds repaint for the LAGO F-16?

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #9 - Apr 12^th, 2003 at 1:24am

BFMF Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender:
Posts: 19820

It sure looks like LAGO's F-16

COMPLETED: If Anyone Cares, Here's A Map Of My Current FSX Flight Around The World

My Reality Check Bounced

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #10 - Apr 12^th, 2003 at 1:30am

Blade Offline
Colonel
Annapolis, MD

Gender:
Posts: 2477

Colicab, what brings you to think FS was meant ONLY to be a civil aviation program? Just because it doesn't have defualt military jets doesn't make it a civil game. Anyways if MS ever attemped to make a F-16 or F/A-18 like they did the default FS aircraft, it would be shameful.

&&&&Dell 4550&&P4 2.53Ghz &&512MB DDR SDRAM&&GeForceFX 5900 129MB&&60GB HD @ 7200RPM &&PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #11 - Apr 12^th, 2003 at 1:53am

OakRaiders Offline
Colonel
SHUT YOUR MOUTH AND GET
THE ROCK A SODA!!
LongIsland N.Y.

Gender:
Posts: 601

I love the F-16 i got emm in ANG NewMexico & Arizona my favorite!

Back to top

IP Logged

	Search the archive: