Simviation Forum - Milan's new F-18 update

Reply #45 - Jan 28^th, 2003 at 5:24pm

BFMF Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender:
Posts: 19820

I don't think so, unless he specifically builds a cfs2 version

COMPLETED: If Anyone Cares, Here's A Map Of My Current FSX Flight Around The World

My Reality Check Bounced

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #46 - Jan 29^th, 2003 at 4:49am

MLK Offline
Colonel
...
Prague

Gender:
Posts: 23

The current version is CFS2 compatible, becasue it's assembled in FSDS1.x

Here is the proof

These shots are from CFS2 with my terrain textures modifcation:

Milan

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #47 - Jan 29^th, 2003 at 10:29am

Tequila Sunrise Offline
Colonel
Nunquam non paratus
Glasgow Scotland

Gender:
Posts: 4149

Yeeeeehaaaaaaa, I've been waiting on a good CFS2 compatible F/A-18 for ages. There was a patch to allow Dean's but it didn't handle like something intended to fly. Grin

If someone with multiple personality disorder threatens suicide, is it a hostage situation?

Thou shalt maintain thine airspeed lest the ground shalt rise up and smite thee

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #48 - Jan 29^th, 2003 at 10:01pm

planespotter Offline
Colonel
I chase airshows
KPSM

Gender:
Posts: 797

Milan, every new shot is just amazing.

I love the fact the burner is connected to RPM's instead of using the lights key or shift F4 Roll Eyes

Turn and burn

If there is an airshow with in 2 states of me I'm there&&&&&&

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #49 - Jan 30^th, 2003 at 12:47am

BFMF Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender:
Posts: 19820

I thought you said it was a GMAX model???

COMPLETED: If Anyone Cares, Here's A Map Of My Current FSX Flight Around The World

My Reality Check Bounced

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #50 - Jan 30^th, 2003 at 4:49am

MLK Offline
Colonel
...
Prague

Gender:
Posts: 23

Quote:

I thought you said it was a GMAX model???

No, I never said that ...

And does really matter, which program was used for its modelling?

I actually created the basic 3D model in AutoCAD and 3D Studio. Then assembled it first in Aircraft Factory 99 ( so this the simplified FS98/CFS1 version ) and later then I assembled it in FS design Studio.

And I have already plans for assembling it in Gmax too, with some reworking and improvements.
But some effects cannot be simply create in Gmax/Makemdl, e.g. the vapour vortices or afterburner efefct controlled by engine RPM.

So the FSDS version has its own advantages.

Milan

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #51 - Jan 30^th, 2003 at 7:44am

BFMF Offline
Colonel
Pacific Northwest

Gender:
Posts: 19820

iQuote:

No, I never said that ...

oops, I think Blade said it was a GMAX model

COMPLETED: If Anyone Cares, Here's A Map Of My Current FSX Flight Around The World

My Reality Check Bounced

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #52 - Jan 30^th, 2003 at 11:40am

Blade Offline
Colonel
Annapolis, MD

Gender:
Posts: 2477

Oh it isnt? I thought it was, my mistake. Embarrassed

&&&&Dell 4550&&P4 2.53Ghz &&512MB DDR SDRAM&&GeForceFX 5900 129MB&&60GB HD @ 7200RPM &&PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #53 - Jan 31^st, 2003 at 6:14pm

coolpick Offline
Colonel
Out and a bout, flying
a route
Pittsburg, KS

Gender:
Posts: 216

that is real nice what day did he put it on here to download?

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #54 - Jan 31^st, 2003 at 6:54pm

Scorpiоn Offline
Colonel
Take it easy!
The Alamo

Gender:
Posts: 4496

It's not available yet. It's still under development.

The Devil's Advocate.&&

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #55 - Jan 31^st, 2003 at 10:39pm

francois Offline
Colonel
I adore the ct 114 of
the snowbirds
Matane Qc

Gender:
Posts: 553

Milan hello be what the wing will fold

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #56 - Feb 1^st, 2003 at 12:14am

David Brice Guest

Quote:

No, I never said that ...

And does really matter, which program was used for its modelling?

I actually created the basic 3D model in AutoCAD and 3D Studio. Then assembled it first in Aircraft Factory 99 ( so this the simplified FS98/CFS1 version ) and later then I assembled it in FS design Studio.

And I have already plans for assembling it in Gmax too, with some reworking and improvements.
But some effects cannot be simply create in Gmax/Makemdl, e.g. the vapour vortices or afterburner efefct controlled by engine RPM.

So the FSDS version has its own advantages.

Milan

Milan,

I hate to correct you, but I've got xml gauges on my Eurofighter which control afterburner display with throttle position (or engine rpm, whatever you prefer) and also wingtip vorticies which come on at certain g forces....

And it's a GMax model....
Grin

Dave.
DSB Design
http://www.dsbdesign.cjb.net

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #57 - Feb 1^st, 2003 at 5:01am

MLK Offline
Colonel
...
Prague

Gender:
Posts: 23

Quote:

Milan,

I hate to correct you, but I've got xml gauges on my Eurofighter which control afterburner display with throttle position (or engine rpm, whatever you prefer) and also wingtip vorticies which come on at certain g forces....

And it's a GMax model....

Grin

Dave.
DSB Design
http://www.dsbdesign.cjb.net

It's OK, Dave

If it's something useful, I'm glad I know about it.
But the afterburner control with throttle position could be done in Gmax itself, using keyframe animation, couldn't?
And the wingtip vortices are also independent effect, I was thinking rather about the second vapour effect, which isn't a FS effect, but textured polygons displayed under certain conditions - and these conditions aren't available in Gmax/makemdl ( I heard somewhere, that these conditions could be used in Gmax models, but it seems it's a kind of "black magic" for me ...

).
If the xml gauge you mentioned, is for public, could you send me it, so I can look at it? - mlk@volny.cz
Milan

Back to top

IP Logged

Reply #58 - Feb 1^st, 2003 at 2:42pm