Search the archive:
Simviation Main Site
|
Site Search
|
Upload Images
Simviation Forum
›
Current Flight Simulator Series
›
Flight School
› VFR or IFR?
(Moderators: Mitch., Fly2e, ozzy72, beaky, Clipper, JBaymore, Bob70, BigTruck)
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
Pages:
1
VFR or IFR? (Read 4226 times)
Feb 11
th
, 2011 at 12:09pm
Air Vandalay
Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!
Gender:
Posts: 18
I've gradually made the transition from props, to turboprops, to airliners in FSX, but I have to ask; do airliners generally fly VFR or IFR? is it weather conditions that dictate this? also is it common to fly VFR (using a STAR arrival) and land using ILS?..
Thank you in advance for not laughing at my dumb questions
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #1 -
Feb 11
th
, 2011 at 2:32pm
JimPilot
Offline
Major
I Like Flight Simulation!
Posts: 4
What's the saying? The only stupid question is the one not asked? (See my post about departure procedures.) Anyway, in the real world, VFR flight is only valid to 18,000ft, after which IFR is required. So I would imagine most if not all airliners fly well above that level. Sorry, can't help with your second question, I still have lots to learn.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #2 -
Feb 11
th
, 2011 at 6:31pm
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
Actually all Part 121 scheduled operators (airlines) are required to fly on IFR flight plans. Altitude has nothing to do with it.
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #3 -
Feb 13
th
, 2011 at 11:56am
-Crossfire-
Offline
Colonel
Northern Canada
Gender:
Posts: 954
DaveSims wrote
on Feb 11
th
, 2011 at 6:31pm:
Actually all Part 121 scheduled operators (airlines) are required to fly on IFR flight plans. Altitude has nothing to do with it.
Altitude has everything to do with it. What about countries other than the US, where the FAR's don't apply.
Above 18,000 feet is class A airspace (at least here in Canada), and Class A requires you to be on an IFR flight plan.
With regards to STARS and ILS's when VFR... VFR aircraft don't use them, as these are strictly IFR procedures. You can practice any IFR procedure while VFR, but you must remain visual and it's referred to as a "simulated" arrival or approach.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #4 -
Feb 13
th
, 2011 at 12:50pm
DaveSims
Offline
Colonel
Clear Lake, Iowa
Gender:
Posts: 2453
-Crossfire- wrote
on Feb 13
th
, 2011 at 11:56am:
DaveSims wrote
on Feb 11
th
, 2011 at 6:31pm:
Actually all Part 121 scheduled operators (airlines) are required to fly on IFR flight plans. Altitude has nothing to do with it.
Altitude has everything to do with it. What about countries other than the US, where the FAR's don't apply.
Above 18,000 feet is class A airspace (at least here in Canada), and Class A requires you to be on an IFR flight plan.
With regards to STARS and ILS's when VFR... VFR aircraft don't use them, as these are strictly IFR procedures. You can practice any IFR procedure while VFR, but you must remain visual and it's referred to as a "simulated" arrival or approach.
What I meant is Part 121 operators, and I believe most if not all 135 operators, must be operating on IFR flight plans, regardless of altitude. The original poster was asking if airliners fly VFR, and the short answer is no.
Dave
www.flymcw.com
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #5 -
Feb 15
th
, 2011 at 10:31am
Air Vandalay
Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!
Gender:
Posts: 18
That kinda takes all the fun out of getiing a payware plane, and learning how to program the FMS, etc, only to have the IFR controller where & when to turn...to me in FSX, flying VFR is more of a challenge..
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #6 -
Feb 15
th
, 2011 at 8:53pm
Splinter562
Offline
Colonel
Tampa, FL
Gender:
Posts: 217
Air Vandalay wrote
on Feb 15
th
, 2011 at 10:31am:
That kinda takes all the fun out of getiing a payware plane, and learning how to program the FMS, etc, only to have the IFR controller where & when to turn...to me in FSX, flying VFR is more of a challenge..
... and now you understand why there are many real-world pilots (myself included) that are crazy about aviation but have zero interest in flying for an airline.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #7 -
Feb 21
st
, 2011 at 11:15am
Sovien
Offline
Colonel
I love YaBB 1G - SP1!
Posts: 323
Air Vandalay wrote
on Feb 15
th
, 2011 at 10:31am:
That kinda takes all the fun out of getiing a payware plane, and learning how to program the FMS, etc, only to have the IFR controller where & when to turn...to me in FSX, flying VFR is more of a challenge..
It's not simulating realism, but whenever I fly the big birds (which is pretty much all the time now), I set up a VFR flight plan, then set up the FMC accordingly. Works great for me, but again, is a departure from realism.
I have noticed, that on some IFR plans I have flown, the route I set up is pretty much the same as the route that the AI ATC was vectoring me to fly. I only deviated by 10-15 degrees heading from time to time, but this did not create big problems for me with the AI ATC.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #8 -
Mar 22
nd
, 2011 at 4:38am
F35LightningII
Offline
Colonel
I Like Flight Simulation!
Auckland, New Zealand
Gender:
Posts: 266
I believe airliners go IFR pretty much all the time
i5 3570K @ 4.3GHz, ASRock Z77 Pro3, EVGA GTX 670 FTW, 8GB DDR3, 128GB Samsung 830, 500GB Seagate Barracuda, Thermaltake Armor A60, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro, Logitech K800, Logitech M510, Windows 8 Pro x64, FSX Acceleration
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #9 -
Jan 23
rd
, 2012 at 7:43am
Jokerc152
Offline
Colonel
High Speed, Low Drag!
Gender:
Posts: 52
Yeah VFR is only really good up to FL180 after that its IFR but I think most airliners fly full IFR from departure ? :L
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #10 -
Jan 23
rd
, 2012 at 4:35pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
Jokerc152 wrote
on Jan 23
rd
, 2012 at 7:43am:
Yeah VFR is only really good up to FL180 after that its IFR but I think most airliners fly full IFR from departure ? :L
Yes... and because of where their operation fits into the FAR "parts", in the US they must file IFR and use the ATC system, even if it's a beautiful day and they aren't going above 18,000 MSL.
Remember, "airline", as far as the regs go (Part 121), means "scheduled commercial carriage of persons or goods"... there are many aircraft and flights that fall into that category other than big jets cruising way up above the weather on long flights. Those FedEx Caravans you see sometimes are airliners (Part 121), so they file IFR even if it's a 1-hour flight in VMC at 5000 MSL. It gets crowded in terminal environments and on airways, and scheduled flights, having a schedule to meet and specific places to go on that schedule, are more likely to encounter IMC weather. Thus the blanket IFR rule. Keeps it simpler for all concerned (except when ATC is vectoring you out of your way in VMC, LOL).
And then there's Part 135... charters, etc ("on demand") commercial operators: often doing the same things as 121, but not scheduled, and not always between the same airports. They do NOT always have to file, regardless of what kind of airplane it is, or who's getting paid for what... although the definition of "VMC" is different for them than for the Part 91 crowd (just about everybody else).
There are other little differences, for equipment, limitations, crew requirements, etc. between Part 91 and 135... it's sort of halfway between 91 and 121. And like everybody else, if they fly above 18,000 MSL, they have to go under IFR.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #11 -
Jan 23
rd
, 2012 at 4:57pm
coolness775
Offline
Colonel
Gender:
Posts: 22
The only airline i have ever heard of not using IFR flightplans, is the Janet airlines because its all top secret and an IFR flightplan would leave a trail. guess they are flying VFR...
Wouldn't surprise me if some of those blacklisted airliners are not always operating under instrument flight rules as well.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #12 -
Jan 23
rd
, 2012 at 5:08pm
beaky
Offline
Global Moderator
Uhhhh.... yup!
Newark, NJ USA
Gender:
Posts: 14187
coolness775 wrote
on Jan 23
rd
, 2012 at 4:57pm:
The only airline i have ever heard of not using IFR flightplans, is the Janet airlines because its all top secret and an IFR flightplan would leave a trail. guess they are flying VFR...
Wouldn't surprise me if some of those blacklisted airliners are not always operating under instrument flight rules as well.
My guess is that they are handled by military ATC, possibly in (limited) coordination with civil ATC... if they are going to fly in the soup or above 18,000, they will be mixing it up with other traffic. For their own safety, that would make sense. Or maybe they just have very reliable TCAS on board...
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #13 -
Jan 23
rd
, 2012 at 6:51pm
Dave71k
Ex Member
I wouldn't worry about FSX ATC it's pretty useless and unrealistic.
I generally get an aircraft and set up a flight plan using the FMC with the correct SIDS and STARS.
FSX ATC doesn't use SIDS or STARS what so ever where as in real life there pretty much use at all times for airlines.
So I would say to just ignore it and set up VRF plans but fly them as if your in IFR.
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #14 -
Feb 19
th
, 2012 at 1:18am
P51FAN
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
Derry Hoggatt
Beggs, OK
Gender:
Posts: 7
-Crossfire- wrote
on Feb 13
th
, 2011 at 11:56am:
Above 18,000 feet is class A airspace (at least here in Canada), and Class A requires you to be on an IFR flight plan.
Not exactly true. From the Aeronautical Information Manual:
3−2−2. Class A Airspace
a. Definition. Generally, that airspace from
18,000 feet MSL up to and including FL 600,
including the airspace overlying the waters within
12 nautical miles of the coast of the 48 contiguous
States and Alaska; and designated international
airspace beyond 12 nautical miles of the coast of the
48 contiguous States and Alaska within areas of
domestic radio navigational signal or ATC radar
coverage, and within which domestic procedures are
applied.
b. Operating Rules and Pilot/Equipment
Requirements.
Unless otherwise authorized
, all
persons must operate their aircraft under IFR. (See
14 CFR Section 71.33 and 14 CFR Section 91.167
through 14 CFR Section 91.193.)
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #15 -
Feb 20
th
, 2012 at 9:28pm
R.D.W.
Offline
Lieutenant Colonel
I Love Simviation.
Posts: 9
I would say 90% use a SID so they can keep track of every-
body I know where your coming from.I have two planes with fmc's and you set up everything and somebody blows it.I'm
not sure if you heard but there's a line of about two or three
727's that fly black because they transport prisoners the ones
nobody wants not even the devil, that way nobody can
hijack them &free a friend or two.I had a opp. some 20
yrs ago to go on a airline sim and the even t/o IFR.
I LOVE IFR IT'S MORE OF A CHALLEGE!!!
Back to top
IP Logged
Reply #16 -
Feb 20
th
, 2012 at 9:46pm
Xpand
Offline
Colonel
Expert on flying bricks.
Portugal
Gender:
Posts: 381
I'm more of a casual VFR guy... Be it on a cessna or in a high speed chase training with a fighter jet...
Up is the way to go.
Back to top
IP Logged
Pages:
1
‹
Previous Topic
|
Next Topic
›
« Home
‹ Board
Top of this page
Forum Jump »
Home
» 10 most recent Posts
» 10 most recent Topics
Current Flight Simulator Series
- Flight Simulator X
- FS 2004 - A Century of Flight
- Adding Aircraft Traffic (AI) & Gates
- Flight School ««
- Flightgear
- MS Flight
Graphic Gallery
- Simviation Screenshots Showcase
- Screenshot Contest
- Edited Screenshots
- Photos & Cameras
- Payware Screenshot Showcase
- Studio V Screenshot Workshop
- Video
- The Cage
Design Forums
- Aircraft & 3D Design
- Scenery & Panel Design
- Aircraft Repainting
- Designer Feedback
General
- General Discussion
- Humour
- Music, Arts & Entertainment
- Sport
Computer Hardware & Software Forum
- Hardware
- Tweaking & Overclocking
- Computer Games & Software
- HomeBuild Cockpits
Addons Most Wanted
- Aircraft Wanted
- Other Add-ons Wanted
Real World
- Real Aviation
- Specific Aircraft Types
- Autos
- History
On-line Interactive Flying
- Virtual Airlines Events & Messages
- Multiplayer
Simviation Site
- Simviation News & Info
- Suggestions for these forums
- Site Questions & Feedback
- Site Problems & Broken Links
Combat Flight Simulators
- Combat Flight Simulator 3
- Combat Flight Simulator 2
- Combat Flight Simulator
- CFS Development
- IL-2 Sturmovik
Other Websites
- Your Site
- Other Sites
Payware
- Payware
Old Flight Simulator Series
- FS 2002
- FS 2000
- Flight Simulator 98
Simviation Forum
» Powered by
YaBB 2.5 AE
!
YaBB Forum Software
© 2000-2010. All Rights Reserved.